Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:David Gareja monastery complex.jpg

File:David Gareja monastery complex.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2010 at 19:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:David Gareja monastery complex.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:David Gareja monastery complex.jpg

•  Info created by Paata Vardanashvili - uploaded by Sandstein - nominated by Gaeser -- Gaeser (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gaeser (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment - Any chance of finding a similar image with a higher resolution? This looks like it would succeed a nomination handily if it weren't relatively small. Cousin Kevin (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--თეკა (talk) 10:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, of very low resolution --Pjt56 (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is no way this will be featured. It is way too low resolution (for a start). I don't know what the point of contesting the FPX is. Both the nominator and now თეკა have contested (perhaps friends or sockpuppets?) without explanation. I suggest you both hang around FP for longer before submitting again. --99of9 (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Size. —kallerna™ 11:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• Objection! Please remove the arrogant garbage about sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry. I don't appriciate being insulted like that. Cousin Kevin (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I wasn't referring to you. You correctly raised the size issue in the first place. Pjt56 then tagged this as FPX because the size made it so unlikely to succeed. The nominator Gaeser and თეკა were the two who contested the FPX without explanation. --99of9 (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Size. --MattiPaavola (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Size, indeed. --Cayambe (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)