Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Enallagma cyathigerum (by).jpg

Info created, uploaded, nominated by ComputerHotline --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ka ʁs tn 08:49, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lycaon (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support really good --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I said. —kallerna™ 15:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detail is excellent.RandyKaelber (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At f/6.3, the DoF is way too shallow and there are no mitigating reasons. -- Ram-Man 01:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Durova (talk) 02:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral you've definitely gotten better but DOF is still a bit shallow. --ianaré (talk) 03:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO DOF is ok --Muhammad (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\^talk 19:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu