Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9336.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9336.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 15:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
- Info Monument of Tlatelolco massacre, Mexico D. F. - all by Ralf Roleček note: the church is totally tilted!
- Support -- Ralf Roleček 15:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support I wish the tower and wall top could have been more in focus, but otherwise this works. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 08:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Old but beautiful. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality QI but no wow and subject is cropped.
However, the image is currently not eligible for FP because it doesn't have a suitable free licence. Please stop nominating such images (or add the appropriate licences), Ralf, as it is tedious to have to keep pointing it out.-- Colin (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Excuse me, i forgot to enter the FAL additional for Colin. --Ralf Roleček 21:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- It isn't for my benefit, it so that someone (other than Wikipedia) has a chance to actually use your images without breaching the ridiculous licence terms of GFDL. The oppose stands, I'm afraid -- I'm seeing too many QIs nominated at FPC currently. -- Colin (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- From my numerous photos are also used in printed books. GFDL is not user-hostile. --Ralf Roleček 21:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- I followed some of the links but fail to find any that comply with the GFDL by printing full 3279-word text of the licence. It seems people are using your image either by breaking the terms of the licence or because you have agreed terms outside of the licence (which is totally not the point of free works, as one can do that with "all rights reserved" images too). -- Colin (talk) 22:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Colin. Also, the background people placement is unbefitting.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Good high-quality photo, little wow to me. — Julian H.✈ 18:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per julian. Amada44 talk to me 20:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose as per others. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)