Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alp Dado Sura boven Breil-Brigels (d.j.b.) 15.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Alp Dado Sura boven Breil-Brigels (d.j.b.) 15.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2018 at 15:26:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects Others.
- Info Components of a ski lift. See note. A photo can hardly be easier. For me the photo is in a nice balance. (The art of omission?) All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Incomplete parts. And I cannot see FP here at all. Charles (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charles. --Karelj (talk) 20:25, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support I may be in the minority not only now, but when all the !votes are counted. Nonetheless I find this a pleasing abstract in terms of its clear, spare shapes; symmetry and harmonious, subdued colors. It reminds me very much of Cart's work; in fact when I first saw it I thought it was one of her nominations. Daniel Case (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral There are several similar pictures in the same category (example this one or that one ), but for this kind of "abstract" shot where all is in the balance, I think the quality must be really impressive, like perfect DoF or focus stacked. While here the focus is on the wooden wall, the subject being slightly unsharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral Two thoughts about it: I'm wondering if the image could benefit of a bit more contrast, saturation and maybe brightness, it looks a bit flat. The other thing is that the objects IMO aren't centered, there is slightly more space on the left handside. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- OK, better now, but I think I don't see it as a FP. --Basotxerri (talk) 10:57, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results: