Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bamberg Altenburg-20191015-RM-083640.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bamberg Altenburg-20191015-RM-083640.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2021 at 11:50:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Good image but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:29, 8 July 2021 (UTC)- Oppose Has the wow, I think, but a lot of distortion and unsharpness down near the bottom, not all of which is the fog's fault. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Neutral The sharpness should be better. There are JPEG artifacts too. And I'm not sure about the WB. The composition is good and IMO a candidate for FP. I really like the castle behind the fog. --XRay 💬 09:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)- Info Thank you for the nom @Tomer T: . I always find denoising fog images problematic because image noise and fog are very similar. In this case, the castle was still covered by faint fog that had dissipated a minute later. I made a new version to at least compensate for the uneven denoising. Thanks for the reviews @GRDN711: @Daniel Case: @XRay: The WB is so shortly after sunrise.--Ermell (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Methodios (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The view is nice and the fog is nice, but the fog pretty much blocks the view in a horizontal band, and that damages the composition to my mind. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The fog is beautiful but disturbing. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
