Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Rhino grazing.jpg

File:Black Rhino grazing.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 03:10:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Black Rhino grazing.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Rhino grazing.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created by Lucas Alexander, uploaded by Haha169, nominated by Yann (talk) 03:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 03:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a very sharp picture of an uncategorised rhino. Charles (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpless --Mile (talk) 08:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I change my mind. Lets say, for books more than good, compo especially. --Mile (talk) 13:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose unfocused, not even a QI.--Peulle (talk) 09:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Charlesjsharp, PetarM, and Peulle: It is quite sharp at 6 Mpx. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

• strange that the largest size under the image doesn't take me to the 6MB version. Charles (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

• @Yann: I will withdraw oppose if you can get the 6MB version showing up when I click 5,472 × 3,648 pixels. Charles (talk)

• @Charlesjsharp: Sorry, but it works OK for me, so I can't do anything about it. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Somehow OK, if not opening in full. VI probably, good compo is still there. --Mile (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 15:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @Daniel Case and Charlesjsharp: I added the category. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)@Yann: Fine, but that was the lesser of the two issues Charles based his oppose on (see !vote below). Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Unfocused. -- Pofka (talk) 17:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment TBH, comments here are not fair. The image is good, and it is animal in the wild taken with a telelens, not a fixed object. This would certainly good enough for National Geographic, but not good enough for Commons? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

 Vox populi suprema lex est. Yann (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)