Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddha Sculpture In Kritipur-9750.jpg

File:Buddha Sculpture In Kritipur-9750.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2022 at 09:38:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Buddha Sculpture In Kritipur-9750.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddha Sculpture In Kritipur-9750.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
•  Info created by Bijay Chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay Chaurasia - nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Beautiful sculpture and a good photo of the sculpture. What's the rectangular object up high on the left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The light switch high up on the left is a little too prominent. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:16, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment IMHO this photo shows rather a sculpture than architecture, therefore I have changed the gallery link. --Aristeas (talk) 09:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
• @Bijay Chaurasia: It should be easy to clone out that light switch from the background. I can do it for you if you want – just ping me. --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
• @Aristeas: , @Ikan Kekek: , @SHB2000: I have uploaded new version with some correction as Ikan and Aristeas suggested, Please have a look, Thank you -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support We'll see what other people think: It's possible to nitpick about the upper reaches of the statue maybe not being pinpoint sharp or just slightly grainy, but it's unclear to me how much of that is the stone itself, and the main point to me is that this composition is peaceful, the sensation a statue of the Buddha should produce. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. The top seems a little grainy, but this is certainly also due to the structure of the stone (cf. the lower part). --Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I tried viewing this image on my phone this morning and it was still very obvious. Not so much on my computer, but FPs need to be impeccable, so my opinion stands the same. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Question SHB2000, what was still very obvious? Just asking because I really do not understand. At least I do not see the light switch anymore you referred to in your first comment. --Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

  Zoom in (if you're on desktop) to the left and you'll see a very noticeable black panel. SHB2000 (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you, now I know what we are talking about. I would not call it very noticeable – it’s almost invisible on my (calibrated) monitor. But if it irritates you, you oppose rightly, of course. --Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Technical issues noted above, and really rather unexceptional to me. The lit area at the bottom is distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel Case. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose While it’s not bad, it’s not a great composition either, and rather noisy. --Kreuzschnabel 06:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)