Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 35-37 HDR.JPG

File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 35-37 HDR.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2014 at 14:15:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 35-37 HDR.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 35-37 HDR.JPG

•  Info North transept (with the north wall in the middle) of the Salisbury Cathedral, located in the city of Salisbury, Wiltshire, England, is the largest in Britain. The temple, an Anglican cathedral, is one of the leading examples of Early English architecture. The canopy on the left is dedicated to John Michael Peniston (Salisbury architect), in the tomb in the middle lies Bishop John Blyth (Bishop of Salisbury between 1493-1499) and the statue on the right honours the historian Richard Colt Hoare. The cathedral was consecrated in 1258 and its spire is the tallest in the United Kingdom. All by me, Poco² 14:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 14:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) 14:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very well done --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 22:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 09:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC) This is exactly, how good tone-mapping has to be used! Really good work! --Hubertl (talk) 09:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Don't agree this is how tone mapping should be used. It looks a tad overdone to me, and unfortunately, Diliff provides us with a ton of better executed pictures of similar subjects. It's still a striking place and picture with a delicate lighting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benh (talk • contribs) Poco² 19:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

  Please, next time use --~~~~, Thank you! --Hubertl (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The HDR isn't a distraction here. Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --DXR (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The conditions, with bright sunlight, are difficult and the stained glass is not blown. However, the direct sunlight on the stone is completely blown (it may have been pulled back to an off white, but there's no detail). But those areas are small overall and the important aspects are exposed fine. Btw, in my discussion with Poco_a_poco he said he used enfuse for HDR. This is an exposure fusion technique that does not generate a high-dynamic-range intermediate stage, nor does it apply any tone mapping. The effect can be more natural than that produced by crude tonemapping software like Photomatix, but several of my textbooks regard Lightroom's tonemapping as the current state-of-the-art when fed a 32-bit floating-point HDR tiff. One still needs another tool to produce such an HDR tiff (e.g. Photomatix), however. That's the technique I believe Diliff uses with success, though the intermediate files are huge. My guess is that 3 exposures were insufficient to capture the full dynamic range in this scene. -- Colin (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

  Indeed I use the enfuse tooling for my (pseudo-)HDRs. I've been using it for over one year and I am pretty convinced about the results, so I'll keep doing it, but of course a matter of taste. Poco² 21:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:34, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /— revi_msg 14:30, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors