Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eiffel Tower and Pont Alexandre III at night.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 21:54:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Getfunky Paris (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)- Support Very good quality, and a lovely athmosphere. - A.Savin 22:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Weak support Love it! Awesome quality and atmosphere. A pity those ships passed by. Also big CAs. --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:29, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support per A.Savin. Tomer T (talk) 07:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support – A brilliant panorama, very evocative: the color and composition transcend any loss of detail. SteveStrummer (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
weak oppose I trully LOVE the picture, but I think is a copyvio. The lights of Eiffel Tower aren't free and I don't think they are "de minimus" here. If I'm mistaken, please let me know and I will change my vote.Béria Lima msg 20:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment - It is beautiful, but I do share Beria's concerns. I have nominated it for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)- Oppose The lights of the boats are ruining this very interesting picture (I don't like the fact they are cut at half of the picture). However regarding the Eiffel tower lightning, I believe the Eiffel tower would be de minimis if there was a copyright problem, but it's not even sure. For now most of the Eiffel tower picture by night have been restored on Commons. What do we know ?:
- SETE has registered industrial property of the eiffel tower (mark) and the lightning system, but the day we will want to reproduce such lightning system for an Wiki monument we will pay a licence for sure, but that's not the point here.
- The SETE won a court case on which they base their arugmentation. However this only court case was about a specific dynamic lightning show and not the regular lights of the tower.
- So either we invent a jurisprudence here and delete everything, either we wait a judge to create a case law for this.
- You can take a look at Category:France FOP cases/kept or this previous FPC Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reflet-tour-Eifel-Paris-Luc-Viatour.jpg --PierreSelim (talk) 21:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment – The graceful arc of the unseen ships is a key element of this picture's rich impressionism, and I don't think it would be nearly as interesting without them. SteveStrummer (talk) 04:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I dislike the "unseen ships", I see a lot of CA (pillars of the statues at right), and the gildened statues at right are completely unsharp, for instance. There is a slight perpsective distorsion of the left pillars of the Bridge, too.--Jebulon (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 9:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support Agree with SteveStrummer about "the graceful arc". -- Achird (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Claus (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
