Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erdfunkstelle Fuchsstadt, a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Erdfunkstelle Fuchsstadt, a.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2016 at 16:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert
- Support -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Neutral as author too ;-)@Rainer Lippert: magst Du Dein eigenes Bild nicht? Hier auf Commons ist es üblich auch sein eigenes Pro zu geben. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)- @Alchemist-hp: Eigenlob stinkt aber ;-) Wenn das aber hier so üblich ist, ok. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Now Support :-) nice view. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Das ist ja wohl jedem freigestellt. Ich habe schon mehrmals meine Eigennominationen mit neutral bedacht, wenn ich das Gefühl hatte, es sei zu billig, wenn meine Stimme hinterher gerade mal die Sieben voll macht. Das heißt nicht, daß man von seinem Bild nicht überzeugt wäre. Es mag üblich sein, Unterlassung ist aber kein Grund zum Stirnrunzeln. --Kreuzschnabel 21:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Alchemist-hp: Eigenlob stinkt aber ;-) Wenn das aber hier so üblich ist, ok. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I can see how the radial lines might have been what you wanted to shoot, but we don't see enough of them to make this striking enough for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Daniel. INeverCry 21:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Surely nice but not outstanding for me. Being nice and flawless does not yet justify a feature. Stark horizontal lines in the foreground (here the row of trees) often make the viewer feel locked out from the farther scenery. Try to crop that out, the image will be much clearer and more inviting, at least in my eyes. Ein weit entferntes Objekt wird von einem als groß empfundenen Vordergrund (und Bäume sind groß) auch sehr klein gemacht. --Kreuzschnabel 21:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Very good photo of great encyclopedic and technical interest that should be a VI and a QI, but I don't find the composition interesting enough per se to support a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very good photo of great encyclopedic and technical interest, I see no lack of composition. This means we have a featured picture. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 00:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)