Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erosion of tephra layers - Lanzarote 11.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2018 at 12:05:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)- Support Beautiful symmetry for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment At first glance the light because of the time of day does not make me crazy, but looking at it it can be improved by burning in the foreground and maybe make it a bit darker than the top part. Depending on the result I may support. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Done You are right, the light looks more balanced now --Llez (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- I prefer this version, too. But is it truer to life? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- It is the same material both in the bottom and in the upper part, so the colours are equal (as they are now). On the other hand, the angle of the light is dfferent, so that the bottom seems to be brighter than the eroded "rock" (previous version). As the light changes durig the day and also its angle of entry, both versions are "real" in my opinion, it depends on the time the photo is taken. In addition, if the object is in shadow (clouds) you have additional different lightning conditions. --Llez (talk) 05:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then why don't you take the photo at a different time, when it actually looks like this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you are on tour, you can't wait hours for a single shot. I was at this place twice, but the first time it was too cloudy for fotos, so I returned another day (which was not planned). --Llez (talk) 11:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Right, but IMO, you're cheating. Good work, but not actually real. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- It was the suggestion of Tomascastelazo (see above), I first uploaded the version with the actual ("true" in your sense) lightning. --
Llez (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- * Comment Ikan Kekek Well, then, photography itself is the all time cheater! From analog to digital the true image is born with one bias or another due to the media on which the image is recorded. Black and white then could be considered an untruthful representation, color film had its own bias that people described as personality. True color reproduction has almost never been the case and it is brought about by some sort of manipulation, filters, burning and dodging, etc. In this particular case the brightness of the foreground was due to the angle of reflection of the light and it is a valid and legitimate technique to burn in an area in order to make the image more apparent to what the eye sees. In different brightness values the eye and the brain compensates, not so with photography, so a little help actually makes the image look the way the brain saw it. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support - That's a good argument, within reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- *
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support It looks like a fantasy castle -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 22:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Qualified support Sky and clouds look a little overprocessed to me, but they're not the subject and don't take up much of the image. The detail on the rock is excellent and highlights the geological aspects well. Daniel Case (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
