Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2016 at 15:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
- Info Bust of Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor. National Gallery of Slovenia. My shot. --Mile (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support and Info, in case this question should arise: Francis was the second of his name as Holy Roman Emperor and the first as Austrian Emperor. For two years he served in fact as double emperor. Lucky him. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Info Not so lucky IMO. He lost his title of Holy Roman Emperor due to his defeat against Napoleon at the battle of Austerlitz, and the millenarian Holy Roman Empire was just simply destroyed after this battle. It was the end of the Habsburg domination over Germany. No, not so lucky...--Jebulon (talk) 11:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- C'mon, Jebulon, I was just kidding - maybe I should have added a smiley. ;-) Offtopic: As for Habsburg's relative standing in the context of the German power struggle, I'm not sure that the endgame was already played out. I'd rather argue that this didn't happen until 60 years later. The lamentable result's the same, though. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- I was kidding too ! After all, after being the nephew of Louis XVI, he became Napoleon's step-father, and the grand father of Napoleon II ! I was greeting him for that !--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- C'mon, Jebulon, I was just kidding - maybe I should have added a smiley. ;-) Offtopic: As for Habsburg's relative standing in the context of the German power struggle, I'm not sure that the endgame was already played out. I'd rather argue that this didn't happen until 60 years later. The lamentable result's the same, though. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Info Not so lucky IMO. He lost his title of Holy Roman Emperor due to his defeat against Napoleon at the battle of Austerlitz, and the millenarian Holy Roman Empire was just simply destroyed after this battle. It was the end of the Habsburg domination over Germany. No, not so lucky...--Jebulon (talk) 11:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support - An appropriately neo-Classic likeness of a Holy Roman Emperor, well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Jee 03:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 03:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support And 7 ...--LivioAndronico (talk) 21:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support--M★Zaplotnik (edits) 18:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support I like the delicate variations of the colors.--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 21:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculptures