Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gnesau Zedlitzdorf 34 ehem Kloster Karmeliterhospiz 09122015 9428.jpg

File:Gnesau Zedlitzdorf 34 ehem Kloster Karmeliterhospiz 09122015 9428.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 10:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gnesau Zedlitzdorf 34 ehem Kloster Karmeliterhospiz 09122015 9428.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gnesau Zedlitzdorf 34 ehem Kloster Karmeliterhospiz 09122015 9428.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz 10:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose This would definitely be improved with a 16:9 crop to remove the bottom muddy grass. I'm not sure even then the composition is FP but will think on it. -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support A crop might do, Colin's suggestion is really helpful I think. --Tremonist (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment  Done Thanks, Colin and Tremonist, for your very useful assessments. I cropped it according to your advices and wonder if the result will be more convenient for you than before. --Johann Jaritz 14:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Support - That crop improved the composition to a surprising degree. I find this a clearly good composition now. I like its restful quality and the interplay between the grass and hay in the foreground, the cloudy sky in the background and the hill with evergreens on it, with the church and evergreens to its right in the middle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Ikan, for your poetical comment. --Johann Jaritz 15:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Johann you should ping previous voters if you change the image this much. @Uoaei1 and Tremonist: -- Colin (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I still support after the change! --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I do so as well. It's much better now! Thank you, Johann, for your work, and thank you, Colin, for informing me! --Tremonist (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I apologize for not having pinged the mentioned users. ----Johann Jaritz 17:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, far better with this crop! --Hubertl 15:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 20:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The composition issues Colin notes, plus the overexposure of the house and the oversaturated sky above it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The perspective distortion is excessively corrected. The vertical lines (castle, trees) are not... vertical... Gzzz (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings