Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2010 at 14:30:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, ,uploaded and nominated by -- Böhringer (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Böhringer (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Neutralcrop is better than at the other one. But the same problem as before, it´s much to dark imo. I´ll try to light it up a little to show you what I mean when I'm back home in the evening... Gruß mathias K 14:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC) now Support, Alchemist-hp was faster. It's a big improvment for the picture! bg mathias K 10:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support good foreground/background sharpness. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:05, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Avenue (talk) 11:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Background a bit noisy, butterfly not sharp enough. --Eusebius (talk) 16:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The top left thing in the background diminishes the elegance. --99of9 (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose It's an OK shot, but the butterfly is insufficiently sharp. It may be that it is not properly aligned with the focal plane, but the DoF is also on the shallow side, so there is little room for error. Relatively poor lighting: The sharpest part of the butterfly (the head) appears shadowed. -- Ram-Man 11:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)