Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hannes Kollist.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2014 at 00:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Lauri Kulpsoo - uploaded and nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Flickrworker (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Question Why, please ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose good quality but not notable enough for FP --A.Savin 20:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment What exactly do you mean by "not notable enough"? Person in the photo? Just being curious. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. As it seems, the guy doesn't even have his own wikipedia article. --A.Savin 10:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Has now. He is also rather likely to become a professor soon in Tartu Univerity, he is very successful in his field of study and is definitely notable enough for an article.
- What makes it interesting for me, is that at some moment there is a situation where person has to be very well known and in some situation not at all. In what situation we should talk about notability? What it it's just an image of an old lady sitting on a street market or a young boy in beach?
- I would argue that it is an interesting image with a notable person. But I'd let you do decide if you agree. Kruusamägi (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Now, perhaps he's indeed an ambitious scientist; but looking at Commons:Featured pictures/People, we see that there are portraits of people who play in a much higher league wrt their relevance; surely there are also photos of common people, but that pictures typically have some artistic component, and/or an unusual composition, etc. which qualifies them to be among the "very best of Commons". This picture here, however, is neither of particularly high EV nor of much artistic value, so not enough for FP to me (my opinion; maybe just a matter of taste). --A.Savin 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. As it seems, the guy doesn't even have his own wikipedia article. --A.Savin 10:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Neutral I like the framing and pose very much, looks natural. I don't see a justification for the strong green tint and quality is good but not exceptional. A little sharpening with a radius around 3-5 pixels would help a bit I think and removing the tint, then it would be great. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)- Oppose Burnt out area to the left,vignetting, bad lighting of the face, neither a portrait nor a documantation of scientific work, very small DOF (nothing really sharp). --P e z i (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
