User talk:P e z i

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.


Archiv:
User_talk:P e z i/Archiv 2013
User_talk:P e z i/Archiv 2014

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Plages 2013 DSC 0822w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bewertungen

[edit]

Hallo Peter! Ich war und bin tatsächlich immer jener Fotos, mit denen Sie WP bereichern. Ihre letzten Kandidaturen auf COM:FPC und QI sowie Ihr Kommentar bei File:SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Wolfsberger AC 20141122 (023).jpg lassen mich jedoch mit Staunen zurück. Sie bemängeln eine (zugegebenermaßen) Überbelichtung, die der Signalfarbe des Trikots bei Flutlicht(!), während Sie die Überstrahlung und Überbelichtung bei ihren Kupppelsaal-Fotos nicht erkennen wollen. Schon als wir die Porträts des Torhüters bei Tageslicht gemacht haben, hetten wir diesen veranlasst, ein anderes Trikot anzuziehen. Freundliche Grüße --Steindy (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Steindy,
-falls der etwas verunglückte erste Satz ein Lob meiner Fotos ist, dann sage ich danke dafür!
-Das "Sie" ist von meiner Seite nicht notwendig, ich habe es bisher als ganz nett gefunden, dass innerhalb der Wikipedia/Wikimedia per Du angesprochen wird; aber ich kann damit leben ...
-Mit Staunen zurückgelassen bin ich des Öfteren bei Ihren Meldungen in QIC. Ich hatte dort natürlich auch eine gewisse Eingewöhnungsphase in der ich schon mal dem einen oder anderen Regular auf den Schlips getreten bin. Aber insgesamt habe ich mittlerweile die Atmosphäre als korrekt, sachlich und relativ höflich wenn auch manchmal kurz angebunden erlebt. Wenn dann Aussagen wie "Revanche-foul" kommen, dann denke ich mir beim ersten Mal noch, OK, vielleicht schlecht geschlafen. Wenn das aber dann zum System wird und die persönlichen Angriffe in mehr oder weniger Rundumschläge ausarten, was dann??
-Zur Sache: Wenn ein Trikot eines Spielers als wesentlicher Teil des Bildes überbelichtet ist und somit die Zeichnung in diesem Bildteil nicht mehr sichtbar ist, dann ist das für mich ein Ausschlussgrund für QI. Wenn ich in diesem Fall EXIF-Daten sehen könnte, dann würde ich versuchen mich mit dem Problem genauer auseinanderzusetzen und u.U. dem user einen Tipp in die eine oder andere Richtung geben. Wenn andererseits bei einem Bild wie dem Kuppelsaal die, zugegebenermaßen völlig ausgbrannten Fenster helfen den Eindruck wiederzugeben den man im Saal stehend hat, nämlich eine von diesen Fenstern ausgehende Helligkeit die in den Augen schmerzt, und an den Stellen der Fenster auch keinerlei Struktur verlorengegangen ist, dann finde ich das keinen Ausschlussgrund für QI.
LG --P e z i (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Pezi,
ich hatte deshalb nicht mehr geantwortet, weil und beide doch zu unterschiedliche fotografische Ansichten und Standpunkte trennen. Dies ändert nichts an der Anerkennung, vieler deiner wirklich beeindruckenden Fotos. Ein schöes Weihnachtsfest und immer scharfe Linsen wünscht dir --Steindy (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Wenn das, was der nämliche Benutzer gemacht hat, keine Revanchefouls waren (hier die Historie dazu), dann hast du eine bemerkenswerte Sichtweise zu solchem Vorgehen, das ich keinem anderen Benutzer wünsche.
Servus Steindy,
zunächst einmal welcome back! Das Lob und die Anerkennung für wirklich gute und auch für die Wiki brauchbare Fotos kann ich nur zu gerne zurückgeben. Auch wenn ich bei der Bewertung als QI des öfteren gegen deine Fotos gestimmt habe, heißt das keineswegs, dass ich die Fotos nicht gut finde. Sie entsprechen nur meiner Meinung nach nicht den Regeln für Quality Images. Diese Regeln sind irgendwie historisch entstanden, bei manchen Details hätte ich auch gerne Veränderungen (z.B. ist die 2MP Grenze für mein Gefühl nicht mehr zeitgemäß). Andererseits habe ich auch Bilder hochgeladen, die aus Scans von alten Diapositiven stammen und bei denen ich gar nicht versucht habe sie als QI einzureichen. Trotzdem finde ich, dass diese Bilder ihren Zweck im Artikel erfüllen.

Zu der Geschichte mit den "Revanche fouls": Ich habe das nicht so im Detail verfolgt, und wahrscheinlich hat dein Eindruck gestimmt, dass es eine "Retourkutsche" war. Mein Kommentar bezog sich aber eher auf dein Verhalten - ich habe schon mehr als einmal erlebt, dass bei QI ein Hitzkopf dachte, er kann sich für eine Beurteilung "rächen". Die Regulars reagieren da meist ganz cool, schicken die betroffenen Bilder in die Discussion und dann regelt sich das. Da bei deinen Bildern allerdings doch meistens die Mehrheit die Meinung vertreten hat, dass es kein QI ist, relativiert sich für mich halt auch das "Revanche foul" ...

Auch dir schöne Feiertage, LG --P e z i (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barrage-écluse de Vias, East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frieda-Nödl-Hof, Vienna, Northern façade, view from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Rosenburg, Tournament ground and arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campus WU D4 DSC 1441w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Wann hört sich das endlich auf mit den schiefen Häusern in Wien. Langsam wirds langweilig --Hubertl 01:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuppelsaal TU Wien DSC 8705w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:00, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Basically a very good photo if it were not for the extremely overexposed, and outshone window. --Steindy 15:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)  Support Sorry it was a Fata Morgana what I saw. Almost perfect. --Steindy 21:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sportmittelschule Wittelsbachstrasse DSC 1659w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuppelsaal TU Wien DSC 8701w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krieauer Beisl Portal DSC 1228w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campus WU, Departement 4, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schools in Vienna, Sportmittelschule Wittelsbachstraße, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Promotion VI

[edit]
Hello Pezzi,
Promote my photography, Morocco - Volubilis -01.JPG this morning went wrong. Can you see the problem is please, thank you.
Best Regards. --Wayne77 (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seal manually applied. Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank, --Wayne77 (talk) 16:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much

[edit]

Thanks for your help with the process making File:2011 Bill Cosby.jpg a Valued Image as best quality image for the topic of en:Bill Cosby.

Much appreciated,

-- Cirt (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again

[edit]

Thanks also for your help with the process making File:2014 Charlie Beck.jpg a Valued Image as best quality image for the topic of en:Charlie Beck.

Much appreciated,

-- Cirt (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian mask in VI

[edit]

Thank you for your flattering assessment of my image of the Brazilian mask. This image would probably FP if we want to be interested in what it is, but it would be judged on technical criteria are not met. I did it in our reserves in bad conditions. But I accept your idea and when I have a moment I will apply myself to do well this image. This mask and its history are fascinating. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kuppelsaal TU Wien DSC 8691w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kuppelsaal TU Wien DSC 8691w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schuetzenhaus Donaukanal Wien DSC 9948w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mission of China at UNIDO Vienna DSC 9813w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mission of China at UNIDO Vienna DSC 9805w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schützenhaus, Vienna, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Permanent Mission of China at UNIDO, Vienna, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaukraftwerk Freudenau DORIS DSC5907w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kraftwerk Freudenau, information display for shipping.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:An der Obertrave-Luebeck-DSC 0482w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:An der Obertrave-Luebeck-DSC 0482w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2015!

[edit]
* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)  [reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landstrasser Guertel 33 DSC 9043w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landstraßer Gürtel Nr.33, Vienna, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Franz von Assisi Kirche-DSC 0004w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Franz von Assisi Kirche-DSC 0004w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[edit]

Happy new yeaaar, a 2015 of good things, wishes happy holidays --Pava (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TownTown CB03 SouthEast View Vienna DSC 5633w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Somewhat soft, but overall good quality. --Smial 13:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VI candidates

[edit]

If you nominate your pictures to VI can you support pictures from other users, please? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I usually do :-) But this time it was very late when nominating ... --P e z i (talk) 18:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abendgymnasium Wien DSC 5423w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. My support comes with the requirement to remove the dust spot (I left an annotation). --Cccefalon 08:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for review - dust spot removed. --P e z i 13:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abendgymnasium Wien DSC 5426w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abendgymnasium Wien DSC 5441w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support traces of CAs at the dark top right, but it's hard to see so acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abendgymnasium Wien DSC 5456w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abendgymnasium Wien, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Wo ist er denn?

[edit]

Hallo Pezi, ich höre und sehe nichts von dir! Neue Bilder gibt es auch keine. Hast du keine Zeit, keine Lust, oder machst du nur eine Pause? LG --Isiwal (talk) 10:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Isiwal, keine Zeit stimmt nicht ganz, aber die Zeit wird im Moment von einem neuen "Vogel" gefressen: Habe voriges Jahr die Amateurfunklizenz gemacht. Die Lust am Fotografieren war jetzt wetterbedingt auch etwas kleiner; kommt aber eh schon wieder. Und editieren wenn sich was ergibt tu ich auch, aber das fällt klarerweise in den Weiten der Wiki nicht so auf. LG --P e z i (talk) 11:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Freut mich zu hören! Ich hatte schon befürchtet, daß du uns abhanden gekommen bist. Viel Spaß beim Funken. --Isiwal (talk) 12:12, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

[edit]

Hallo P e z i,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

aiuto X traduzione

[edit]

Ciao P e z i , avrei bisogno di un aiuto su dewikiquote, potresti correggere questa pagina? Se vuoi, puoi farti aiutare dalla versione inglese o italiana? Grazie Smitersleon (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QI Tunisia training

[edit]

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nice invitation. I'd highly appreciate to visit your lovely country once more, but unfortunately for several reasons it's impossible at the moment to do so. Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fotoprojekt Volkskundemuseum-Depot

[edit]

Wir haben am 5. Juni die einmalige Gelegenheit, 40 ausgewählte, sonst nicht öffentlich zugängliche Objekte im Depot des Volkskundemuseums im Wiener Hafen zu fotografieren, zu denen wir auch Erläuterungen vor Ort sowie Beschreibungstexte bekommen. Es würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du Zeit und Interesse hast als Fotograf mitzumachen. Genauere Infos stehen auf Commons:GLAM/Volkskundemuseum Depot 2019, Rückfragen gerne auch direkt an mich.

Liebe Grüße, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 14:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

[edit]

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Man met een geweer met lange loop, RP-T-2009-89-12.jpg

[edit]

Does he has some magic feet or is there a good reason to not rotate it? --193.171.152.104 14:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since there were some vandalism edits from this IP I didn't look very carefully. Think you are right in this case. Best wishes to Austrian Ministery of Defense :) (FYI: Edits from Governmental IP-ranges are observed) --P e z i (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What type of vandalism? The only real vandalism I can see is on de.wikipedia the change in article Funkgerät --193.171.152.103 08:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

[edit]
Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Kalvarienberg Frauenkirchen DSC 4847w.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seerose

[edit]

Hallo Peter, Gerade bin ich über ein Foto einer Seerose von dir gestolpert, die als Nymphaea alba bezeichnet war. Das Bild zeigt aber ganz klar eine Hybride der Untergattung Nymphaea ohne jedes Merkmal einer N. alba - was nicht heißt, dass sie nicht in der Ahnenreihe vorhanden ist. Zunächst zeigen die Blätter eine purpurne Punktierung, ein Merkmal, das in dieser Form auf N. mexicana zurückgeht, wenngleich auch N. tetragona agg. eine anders gestaltete Fleckung ebenfalls vererben kann. N. alba hat niemals auch nur die leiseste Spur einer Fleckung oder Punktierung. Weiters haben die Basallappen der Blätter aufgesetzte Spitzen, sind also zugespitzt. Dieses Merkmal ist ein Erbe von N. odorata s.l. Die Basallappen von N. alba sind an den Enden ausnahmslos abgerundet. Außerdem haben alle europäischen Seerosen einen weit offenen Sinus. Die Sorte im Bild hat einen schmalen Sinus, ein Erbe von N. odorata s.l. mit oft überlappenden Basallappen. Der über den Sinus verlängerte Blattrand würde auf kürzestem Weg noch im Bereich des Sinus einen Kreuzungspunkt finden, wie bei N. odorata sl., nicht weit außerhalb, wie bei allen anderen Arten der Untergattung Nymphaea. Weiters steht die Blüte über der Wasseroberfläche, ein Merkmal, das in der Untergattung nur bei N. mexicana und on N. odorata s.l. vorkommt. Die Kronblätter sind nicht ganz so schmal wie bei N. mexicana und so zahlreich, wie sie bei N. odorata s.l. sein können, aber zu schmal und zu zahlreich für N. alba. Die großen Unterschiede in der Länge innerer und äußerer Staubblätter sind bei Arten der Untergattung Nymphaea gar nicht üblich, treten gelegentlich bei N. odorata auf, meist aber nur bei Hybriden. Der Blütenschaft ist dicht behaart, ein Merkmal das bei den Arten ausschließlich bei N. odorata subsp. odorata vorkommt. Es handelt sich also zweifelsfrei um eine Hybride, die hauptsächlich oder ausschließlich (die Kenntnis der Rhizomform ließe genauere Schlüsse zu) auf N. mexicana und N. odorata subsp. odorata zurückgeht. Wenn ein botanischer Taxonname her muss, dann wäre das, mit Vorbehalt, N. ×thiona. Wenn es kein Zufallssämling ist, müsste die Sorte ermittelbar sein. Eine Sorte des Sttandardsortiments scheint es nicht zu sein, die müsste ich erkennen. --CrocusGregor (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo CrocusGregor,
danke für die kleine botanische Privatvorlesung. Falls du einen Antrag auf Umbenennung stellst habe ich nichts dagegen, würde aber bitten die Bildnummer "DSC_3326w" drinnen zu lassen.
Liebe Grüße P e z i (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]