Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holocaust Museum in Berlin.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Holocaust Museum in Berlin.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2018 at 22:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Monuments and memorials
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I've fixed the categories for the file and the FP nom. Please, it would be really nice if you eventually learned how the categorization works here on Commons instead of just "tagging" the photos. You can read about it here: Commons:Categories. --cart-Talk 23:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support works --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Martin, but I think you should change the filename to Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, as this is an outdoor memorial, not a museum. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support --cart-Talk 08:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't find this superior to other photos we have of this memorial. The thin band of woodland at the top, with three trees in foliage, and the boy in a hoodie just doesn't work for me. The use of b&w makes this band, which is out-of-focus, become a dark grey smudge. We have an existing FP File:Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas .jpg which captures the abstract blocks well, even though there are limitations to the technical quality of that image. There is another FPC (failed) Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe Berlin 2014-07-13.jpg. One feature of this and the other FPC is that both fail to give a sense of size of the memorial, which one can see in File:Memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe.jpg. Our current FP was reviewed by Tomas as "Good study in volume, rythm, perspective. Very good graphic attributes." and I think that one is still the best image of this memorial I have seen at FPC. -- Colin (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I feel this one is better than the current FP due the the higher contrasts and shadows, as well as the higher resolution. However, I don't want them both; this for me requires a "delist and replace" vote. The delist vote should be made on the other image in any case, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 11:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Colin; I would also add that while I can see why this shot was worth taking for the photographer, it does not work as it might have been expected to (for me) since there is too much chaos among the forms and shadows. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose The dimensions of the monument are not adequately shown here. Compare this. --A.Savin 22:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Daniel -- P999 (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin. The memorial is huge and IMHO a picture should capture how impressive and bold it is. Manelolo (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)