Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HumphreysPeak.jpg

File:HumphreysPeak.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2009 at 01:47:27

•  Info created by JohnIngraham - uploaded by JohnIngraham - nominated by JohnIngraham -- JohnIngraham (talk) 01:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- JohnIngraham (talk) 01:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very cool effect, good quality --ianaré (talk) 02:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The only image that shows that the Earth is rotating.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. Wow. That is really really really awesome Plrk (talk) 11:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- MartinD (talk) 11:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very original Metalheart (have a talk) 12:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Could you adjust the colors? —kallerna™ 13:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I changed the colors, though I am new to the Wikimedia process, and changed the original file accidentally. How are we supposed to do new versions within this page? JohnIngraham (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very nice. Btw it also reveals flying planes :) --AngMoKio (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Question it would be nice if you could add to the summary some info about how you made that photo (used filter, exif,...)--AngMoKio (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support! --Kjetil_r 19:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Clear case of Wow --Simonizer (talk) 20:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cool, although I prefer star trail images where you do not see the individual exposures as here. One can see the trails divided into 20 pieces from each exposure by small gaps. The snow is also quite blurry and lack details. /Daniel78 (talk) 00:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Claus (talk) 05:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting, but poor quality. I have seen far better star trail pictures. --SvonHalenbach (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per SvonHalenbach. Lycaon (talk) 06:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per SvonHalenbach --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 23:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like specifically the lines in the sky provoked by airliners. →Diti the penguin — 10:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment And the lack of geo-stationary or orbiting satellites (both airplanes and satellites make the much less arced trails from the parts of the sky near to the ecliptic more interesting). It should be possible to determine how fast the aircraft are going if the break in their trail can be found. -- carol (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support The remarks of Daniel78 are right, but nevertheless this picture is still of FP quality for me. -- MJJR (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Cool. Would appreciate details about how the picture was taken --Muhammad 03:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The effect is interesting and cool. The composition is good. I did not like the colors. Crapload (talk) 07:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 16 support (+1 late), 5 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Ö 12:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support - Man On Mission (talk) 11:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)