Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:L.A. Ring, Snebillede. Sankt Jørgensbjerg, 1915. Privateje. Særudstillingen 'Kunstnerbrødre. L.A. Ring & H.A.Brendekilde' Nivaagaards Malerisamling 22.9.19-26.1.20.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:L.A. Ring, Snebillede. Sankt Jørgensbjerg, 1915. Privateje. Særudstillingen 'Kunstnerbrødre. L.A. Ring & H.A.Brendekilde' Nivaagaards Malerisamling 22.9.19-26.1.20.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2019 at 19:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors
Info created by Laurits Andersen Ring - uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)- Support --Pugilist (talk) 18:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support In first instance I wanted to oppose the photo because I did not see anything special about the composition. However after I opened the photo, I realize it is is a painting. So, well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment - OK, but I certainly believe that the lack of an interesting composition is a valid reason to oppose a feature for a picture of a painting, or to simply not vote to support it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose no reason for me to FP nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)- Oppose A painting should not become FP just because it is a painting by a notable artist. I don't see anything remarkable about it that would warrant a feature. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support on the grounds that it is a well-done photo of a painting. We're not !voting on the painting itself. Daniel Case (talk) 01:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose This painting is well-photographed and certainly would be QI. For FP, the whole visual effect has to say "wow" to me and unfortunately, it does not. Sorry. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support The painting is lovely, it's working for me. The resolution is good too. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Seven Pandas (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Exteriors
