Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moon diagram.svg

File:Moon diagram.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2013 at 16:44:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moon diagram.svg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moon diagram.svg

•  Info created by Kelvinsong - uploaded by Kelvinsong - nominated by TheOriginalSoni -- TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- A nice and correct illustration (except for the kitschy title) but not sophisticated enough for promotion. Please take a look at our FP gallery. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral-- The title is not in the good place, the svg is well done.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 11:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

• I've moved the title—Kelvinsong (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
  •  Support--Telemaque MySon (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I really like it. Michael Barera (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Béria Lima ^msg 14:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support — M♦Zaplotnik ^{my contributions} 15:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Who says it has to be sophisticated? Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support - Sometimes I just like simple --heb [T C E] 12:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose For several reasons: (i) Ugly and unnecessary title (should go into image description page, not in image itself), (ii) Unrealistic moon surface (what are those "stars" around the craters?), (iii) Unreadable (too small) radii/lengths, (iv) Lengths need a space between the amount and the unit ("km") and 1737.1 should probably be rounded. (v) Light colored regions on surface should be labeled for completeness. Not extremely important, but having a source for the dimensions could be nice. Also, what does "Editable text is outside the SVG page frame." mean? bamse (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I uploaded a new version(though for some reason the thumbnails aren't updating—click through to the SVG)—III I increased the size of the radii labels, IV There already is a space between the numbers and "km", you probably didn't see it though because of the close kerning. I made it a double space. I also rounded 1737.1 to 1737. V Not sure if this is what you meant, but I added the "terræ" label. VI, The dimensions come from the image it replaced (Main lunar core en.jpg), the rest(crust) from the moon article.

For numbers one and two, the "stars" are the brighter blast marks around craters, and the I feel the title helps with "completeness". Also, for "Unrealistic moon surface", "unrealistic" is an inherent quality of an SVG cartoon. I decided to hand draw this one instead of stacking traces like on my other ones.

"Outside the SVG frame" means that if you open the file in Inkscape, the editable text will still be there, floating outside the boundaries of the rendered image.—Kelvinsong (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 03:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated