Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neopithecops zalmora in love by Kadavoor.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2012 at 09:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)- Support Tomer T (talk) 09:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support High EV, good detail level. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support - A.Savin 16:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Jovian Eye storm 13:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Moonik (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Very sharp and interesting moment. I would have 'digitalized' the shaddow on the background of the image to enhance the balance of the picture.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Could you make an attempt? Jkadavoor (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Again butterflies mating...--Jebulon (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Not a very good argument, per Paolo Costa's nomination below. I was a bit angry, probably... But here I think there is a green cast, so I don't remove my oppose.--Jebulon (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- How could one be angry because of a nomination? This isn't a entertainment channel for long-stay residents so I expect a constantly neutral point of view - everybody should have the same chances regardless of the subsequent topic. Best regards • Richard • [®] • 17:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Who was angry "because of a nomination" ? Did I wrote this ? I think I don't need lessons, furthermore, about the constantly neutral point of view you expect. It is valuable here in FPC to oppose only because of the topic. But yes, everybody should have the same chance, because everybody has the right to nominate any picture he wants. Best regards.--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think no green cast; only more darkness to avoid overexposing of the wings. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Who was angry "because of a nomination" ? Did I wrote this ? I think I don't need lessons, furthermore, about the constantly neutral point of view you expect. It is valuable here in FPC to oppose only because of the topic. But yes, everybody should have the same chance, because everybody has the right to nominate any picture he wants. Best regards.--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- How could one be angry because of a nomination? This isn't a entertainment channel for long-stay residents so I expect a constantly neutral point of view - everybody should have the same chances regardless of the subsequent topic. Best regards • Richard • [®] • 17:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition. 2 tight crop and lacking quality (artefacts, overexposed areas, etc.) Best regards • Richard • [®] • 17:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Tighter crop at bottom is as advised by reviewers in QI to remove unfocused leaf part as much as possible. I tried my best to avoid overexposure; but some light was falling on the wings of the female. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Regarding artefacts, could anybody gift me a good camera? :) Jkadavoor (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Are you sure you are using you existing camera's best settings? Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hmmm, this shot is with the help of a cheap DCR 250 closeup glass in front of my pany. Don't be confused with the less pixels; it makes vignetting above 5MP when attached. -- Please see this discussion too. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support all in all pleasing --Herby talk thyme 17:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -Nice to me --Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 05:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods
