Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orange and cross section.jpg

File:Orange and cross section.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2011 at 21:09:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Orange and cross section.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orange and cross section.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support: Brilliant. TFCforever (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Citron (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Am I the only one not to like the background ? IMHO it should be consistently white, not with bluish or pinkish panels... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support A simple shot like this one can´t really go wrong.--Snaevar (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 19:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose image made of three singles frames, which just had 0,9 MP each time. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Deliberately restrictive license means it's not as valuable in my books. Also small size. --99of9 (talk) 10:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support That's a nice picture :-) --Aktron (talk) 13:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - very nice. Jonathunder (talk) 02:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose too small. W.S. 08:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--shizhao (talk) 12:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Jon C (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The picture is great, the shadows are good an important. But at the top there are visible grey areas, also at the very bottom. Please correct. ---donald- (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Clear vertical stitch lines are present in the image. --JovianEye (talk) 23:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten and Wetenschatje. Can be re-shot.--Jebulon (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Furthermore, no need of three pictures, IMO. The second and the third are sufficient (and should make a better composition...)--Jebulon (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jebulon and others. --Avenue (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Bunnyfrosch (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten and Wetenschatje--Miguel Bugallo 07:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per kaʁstn -- Marmoulak (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)