Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Philodromus aureolus, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-25, DD 30-65 FS.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Philodromus aureolus, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-25, DD 30-65 FS.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 22:08:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Order_:_Araneae_(Spiders)
- Info Female Wandering crab spider (Philodromus aureolus) with her egg sac, Hartelholz forest, Munich, Germany. This specimen is a 6 mm long tiny spider and is widespread in western and central Europe. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support Scary. Perhaps a tiny bit undersharpened? (But really good for such a small sized creature) Cmao20 (talk) 22:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support A bit soft --Wilfredor (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 04:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)--
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Neutralnow, the new version is too bright -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Basile Morin: I reduced it, I think you were right --Poco a poco (talk) 22:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
OpposeThere are a lot of stacking artefacts: Rows of coloured dots, banding, severe unsharpness in overlaying structures (see notes). --Llez (talk) 06:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Llez: I've removed those spots and what you called banding, among other improvements. It's brighter now too. Regarding the "severe unsharpness" I don't think that's a fair feedback. It isn't perfect, spiders are tricky subjects for focus stacking, but there is detail and I see no severe problem here, to be honest. Poco a poco (talk) 07:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral After the corrections done ---Llez (talk) 07:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
OpposeIt is too soft for me. I am surprised at low shutter speed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I had not realized, it is a miracle that this photo came out with so much exposure time --Wilfredor (talk) 12:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Have you actually realised that this image is a FS image (as stated in the title and in the description page)? It is the merge of 36 images. Regarding sharpness, of course I can sharpen it a bit more but, hey! I offer here over 30 megapixel of image, next time will be only 20 Mpx and no sharpness issue... --Poco a poco (talk) 12:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry Diego, I have to guess the original images were not sharp enough. I'm judging sharpness at monitor resolution 1920 x 1080. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I applied a bit of sharpening Charlesjsharp Poco a poco (talk) 22:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think it's better with the sharpening for what it's worth. But this is an FP either way to me. It may lack the pinpoint sharpness of some other focus-stacks (i.e. Ermell's) but it's still very good quality and really impressive for such a small creature. Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think it's better with the sharpening for what it's worth. But this is an FP either way to me. It may lack the pinpoint sharpness of some other focus-stacks (i.e. Ermell's) but it's still very good quality and really impressive for such a small creature. Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I applied a bit of sharpening Charlesjsharp Poco a poco (talk) 22:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry Diego, I have to guess the original images were not sharp enough. I'm judging sharpness at monitor resolution 1920 x 1080. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Have you actually realised that this image is a FS image (as stated in the title and in the description page)? It is the merge of 36 images. Regarding sharpness, of course I can sharpen it a bit more but, hey! I offer here over 30 megapixel of image, next time will be only 20 Mpx and no sharpness issue... --Poco a poco (talk) 12:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I had not realized, it is a miracle that this photo came out with so much exposure time --Wilfredor (talk) 12:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Strong support Very difficult shot, for me taken in an exemplary way!--Sonya7iv (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- I agree with Sonya7iv. To all critics: Make it it better! -- Je-str (talk) 11:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Order_:_Araneae_(Spiders)