Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PlantacaodeSoja.JPG

File:PlantacaodeSoja.JPG, withdrawn

Voting period ends on 1 May 2009 at 21:05:55

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Tfioreze -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - too saturated for my taste.--Avala (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Though vigneting and oversaturation can be used for artistic purposes, the result here is not convincing as the subject and composition are not interesting enough -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Avala. —kallerna™ 11:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Farzaaaad2000 (talk) 22:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- beautiful composition, colour effect is brilliantly done Lx 121 (talk)
•  Oppose per Avala --AngMoKio (talk) 23:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment -- i'm sorry i don't want to pick a fight, but from the similarity of some of the names & opinions, i would like to raise the question of just how many people there really are voting here? Lx 121 (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

We sometimes have cases of socket puppets, though I don't think it is the case here. You can contact admins, they can check IP-addresses. --AngMoKio (talk) 09:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

ty, i was wondering abt that, for a number of the votes, not just this one. i'll try & collate data before i do that Lx 121 (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose As Alvesgaspar. Lycaon (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe something for photo-community or flickr. Can't see any value for unsharp & pseudo oversexed pictures for the project, sorry. --Richard Bartz (talk) 19:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

 Question "pseudo oversexed"??? Please, enlighten me (us). Tiago Fioreze (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Sexing up a picture is more than adding a vignetting effect, raising the saturation and giving plenty of black level. --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Sexing up in Wiki dimension is to add some workers, harvesters or something what makes the picture most valuable for the project because this isn't a sensationalism competition here. --Richard Bartz (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose see Richard. Oversaturated to the point where it becomes a low value picture. --Dschwen (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Color saturation is rather a personal choice than a technical issue, IMO. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
    • It's a tech issue because you loosing every color reference. For non-encyclopedic material or phantasy picturesit doesn't matter. When do you start thinking wikiwise ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

 Tiago Fioreze (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => withdrawn. Maedin\talk 18:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)