Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg

File:Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2011 at 18:15:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg

•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support nice Tomer T (talk) 19:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Citron (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 21:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically good, but no "wow effect". -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 21:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC) PS: Please use dithering for such gradients. Otherwise you will have banding with 24 bit colors. Dithering can easily be achieved with a spread filter (GIMP) or something similar in PS or other software, if applied to the background.
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- aghith 09:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- "Wow." Clever composition choice. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 12:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice, but I agree that the colour banding is a problem. --Avenue (talk) 01:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  SupportWow effect.--Jebulon (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Now wow?! Are we looking at the same thing? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Kiran Gopi (talk) 09:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Has wow enough, but poor lighting/quality of the fossil. Also banding is debilitating the image. W.S. 14:25, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Very interesting picture but technically poor (lighting, background). Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose My vote won't change anything, but the subject is very dark on the head, and the background is "posterized" (banding issue mentioned). Nothing that can't be fixed I think. - Benh (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Ggia (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 00:55, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects