Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vase vaux le vicomte.jpg

File:Vase vaux le vicomte.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2010 at 22:40:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vase vaux le vicomte.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vase vaux le vicomte.jpg

•  Info all by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Abstain as photographer -- Jebulon (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment, excellent quality but imho a bit too foggy for sunshine. Did you reduce contrast? —DerHexer (Talk) 22:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC) P. S.: I tried a derivative work: File:Vase vaux le vicomte changed.jpg (increased contrast, slightly reduced over- and underexposure) Feel free to do whatever you want to do with.
•  Comment Thank you. Yes I did, You're right. Yours is better IMO. How to put yours (with your name) as a "new version" of mine in the same file ?

  Well, I already saw different opinions on fog and contrast on FPC and would recommend to you nominating my derivate as an alternative version. If yours is better, I would do nothing with mine; if mine, I would afterwards load my picture over yours and would be happy being part of your picture's history because I do not think that changing contrast and similar minor changes can meet the threshold of originality. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

• Yes please do so, and upload your (better) file over mine, as a new version, if you agree for a "co-operative nomination" here in FPC. You are welcome !--Jebulon (talk) 00:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

   Done and  Support, of course. If I misunderstood you in any way feel free to revert. And good luck. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support well done result, very nice composition -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 16:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose for the same reasons as given in the QI-review. --Ikiwaner (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Rational and logical ! (but was promoted as QI, at the end...)--Jebulon (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad angle. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
  • You may dislike the angle, or disagree with the choice made by the photographer, but you cannot say "bad angle", because it is not "bad". I disagree with your vote, and dislike it, but I don't feel it is a "bad vote".Thanks for review.--Jebulon (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
    • For something like a vase (yes, like "base," "case" and "chase" fools! lol) I think it would be so much better if we could get a straight-on front view, maybe slightly above or below. I also dislike the heavy shadow right under the top rim sadly, part of the vase is overexposed, part of it is under and a lot of detail is harder to see than it needs to be because of that, how this passed at composition in QI I just don't know. Maybe shoot it at a time the Sun's at a lower angle or there's some cloud cover softening and dispersing the light more evenly. =( Pretty scenery, yes, but if the vase is what we're voting on this isn't cutting it for me. This is a good example of something I'd consider really good vase photography, this is a good example of the cloud cover/low Sun suggestion. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
      • Thank you very much for explanations. I understand your mind now.--Jebulon (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture