Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:WLM-DE-BE-2018-Charlottenburg-Städtische Badeanstalt-20171102 133220.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:WLM-DE-BE-2018-Charlottenburg-Städtische Badeanstalt-20171102 133220.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2018 at 12:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created by Rainer Halama - uploaded by Rainer Halama - nominated by Rainer Halama -- Rainer Halama (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Neutral -- Rainer Halama (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Weak oppose This interior clearly has wow potential and indeed it seems that there previously were no interior pictures of this public pool on Commons, so many thanks to you that you had the idea and made some photos and uploaded them here. However, the noise and the clipped whites on the roof spoil the overall impression, making it not enough for an FP for me, sorry. --A.Savin 13:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)- Per Oppose A.Savin --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment - I won't oppose and would support with a little denoising and dialing down of highlights, per A.Savin's comments. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)- Comment - did a little denoising and dialed down the highlights --Rainer Halama (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks. It's better, but there might still be too much noise for FP. I'm not sure. Difficult light conditions and a very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Maybe I am still a bit too conservative with denoising. But I am afraid to turn it into a painting. ;-) --Rainer Halama (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Smartphone quality : not sharp, too much noise and dull colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose Had me until the skylights. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition but the technical quality is lacking.--Peulle (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 14:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
