Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MOSQUE-ON-WATER.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:MOSQUE-ON-WATER.jpg - not featured
[edit]Info created, uploaded, and nominated by --Ilmarry 15:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Ilmarry 15:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment Please add more info to the pictures summary. Especially the name of the mosque and the place where the mosque is should be found in the summary. --AngMoKio 15:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Support --Karelj 17:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Support--Umnik 17:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Support Nice picture. Can you add a geocoding please? -- MJJR 19:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Noisy, oversaturated, lightspots blured out, distorted. No way that this can be a FP. --Niabot 01:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support Very nice. Above critics are not appropriate. --B.navez 02:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose noise -- Gorgo 11:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, it is very noisy and the light sources are significantly overexposed. --MichaelMaggs 17:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support This is a very good composition with a for me very delicate lightning and colors. Refreshing to see contributions of new topics from regions we seldomly see material from. Sure, the lights are operexposed. But is it a problem? I don't think so. Sure, there is a little bit of noise, but this is hard to avoid at the time of day this photo was taken. Sure, it appears oversaturated. In this case I do not see it as problem. I think it is both beautiful, eyecatching and valuable. -- Slaunger 19:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but it's noisy. -- Laitche 08:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Poor quality. Lycaon 08:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose No wow for me. --Beyond silence 20:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Support. Vanrip 09:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Support Stunning colors, gorgeous motif. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
7 support, 6 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 14:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image:MOSQUE-ON-WATER edit.jpg - not featured
[edit]Info noise reduced. -- Laitche 04:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support nice -- Gorgo 11:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, the light sources are significantly overexposed. --MichaelMaggs 17:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support This is a good edit too. -- Slaunger 19:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose oversaturated, lightspots blured out, distorted. --Niabot 19:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support /Daniel78 00:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
3 support, 2 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 14:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image:Mosque on Water V2.jpg - not featured
[edit]Info taken 3 minutes later without the "overexposed light sources". -- Ilmarry 19:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support ..and it is also good without the light sources, although I prefer the editions with lights on. -- Slaunger 19:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose oversaturated, distorted. --Niabot 19:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Support Wonderful! --Calibas 08:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - A beautiful composition and colouring, I agree. But the photographic quality is not good enough. Alvesgaspar 09:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Support - Much better without the numerous light sources. For me, the image colouring and subject overcome and quality issues. --Cpl Syx 03:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Support --Karelj 21:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Support A bit hesitant on the colors (do they really look like that?), but I like it. --Dori - Talk 22:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I used a cooling filter to emphasize the blue cast to create the intended "mood". The picture seems to be over-saturated because it was shot during the "GOLDEN HOUR". -- Ilmarry
Oppose No wow for me.
Sorry, you should try Commons:Quality images candidates first! --Beyond silence 23:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Quality still poor, sadly can't be saved. Lycaon 08:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Support Beautiful colors and good composition (needs more sharpening maybe?). Nasosi
Oppose as Alvesgaspar, sorry. --MichaelMaggs 07:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Support. Vanrip 09:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment I have removed the votes of two users who I consider to have connections with the uploader/proposer. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Support very nice colors --Manco Capac 13:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
6 support, 5 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 14:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)