Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Snowboard-Negative0-05-3A(1).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Snowboard-Negative0-05-3A(1).jpg not featured[edit]
- Nominate
— Self-nomination, just to see how far it flies, and learn from the mistakes (therefore I will not support it). Rama 23:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- but I think it could be better if the guy on the top wasn't there. YolanC 08:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, yeah, he spoils it for me. --Dschwen 11:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, the legs are gone, but this subject is not a one in a lifetime chance. I'd rather have a picture featured which is right from the start. The edit looks ok at first glance, but has some noticable flaws. Strange variations in sharpness and hue and a washed out part of the snow plume. --Dschwen 14:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment uploaded edit with corrected color of snow. --Wikimol 10:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Neutral edit - as YolanC. distracting legs. --Wikimol 10:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Support --Wikimol 19:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)- Thank you for the colour correction, Wikimol. I am colour-blind, so these things are far beyond me. I have considered the problem of the legs, and there might be attempts at erasing them. Thank you for your interest and comments. Rama 11:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- The legs have now been removed by the talented User:Inisheer. Rama 13:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Full of movement. Kudos to Rama for the photo and to Inisheer for cleaning the other guy out. David.Monniaux 14:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment snow is now slightly greenish. Inisheer, can you play a bit with curves to make the snow less green and the cloud snow less red? --Wikimol 16:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support When I looked at it at full size and saw the particles of snow, I had no other choice :-) --che 00:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Supportimpressive pfctdayelise 03:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Not special. -CSamulili 19:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose I liked it better when the legs were still there, now there is a strange looking dark area. --SehLax 15:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose ACK SehLax Calderwood 08:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- OpposeRomary 11:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose warm colours undersaturated. Unfortunate that his face is in the shadow. Samsara 12:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, yes and no: this is what allows to publish the photograph without infringing on private life. Rama 12:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think you can claim for private life on a ski slope, but I get your point. My comment about undersaturated warm colours stands, however. - 81.157.238.41 20:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, yes and no: this is what allows to publish the photograph without infringing on private life. Rama 12:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose → not featured Calderwood 09:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)