Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Amphipodredkils.jpg

File:Amphipodredkils.jpg, delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2009 at 10:02:34

•  Info Reason to delist (Original nomination): The picture looks cool, but the resolution (0.6 Megapixels only!) is beyond inacceptable for a Featured Picture.
•  Delist As nominator. -- JovanCormac 10:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist —kallerna™ 12:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist --Karel (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist even the subject is uncertain (it says "possibly Ampeliscidae") --Avala (talk) 13:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comment The subject is certain, the exact species is uncertain :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Neutral There may be mitigating reasons for size if we knew the size of the subject, I understand these can range from 1mm upwards. --Tony Wills (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Im sorry but I just cant understand how absense of a proper descripton can be a mitigating reason. In my opinion, it works in the opposite direction. Otherwise we could feature any picture bad enogh to make proper identification impossible just because the shot might be hard enogh to take so that we might never get a better picture of that subject. --Korall (talk) 11:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Sorry, you mis-understand me. I am not saying "absence of a proper description can be a mitigating reason", I am with-holding my delist/keep vote until I have more information (hopefully someone will enlighten me before voting is over :-). If indeed this is a very small crustacean then I would certainly vote to keep. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comment My guess is between 8 mm and 12 mm, could even be larger as it is a deep water pelagic species. Family (Ampeliscidae) is most probably correct. Lycaon (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Delist Unidentified and low resolution. the total value is not there. --Korall (talk) 10:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Regretfully delist. Not properly identified. Lycaon (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist No mitigating circumstances. --JalalV (talk) 23:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 1 neutral => delisted. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC)