Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Canada goose flight cropped and NR.jpg

File:Canada goose flight cropped and NR.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2010 at 00:55:20

•  Info Less then half the required number of megapixels. (Original nomination)
•  Delist --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist – I have to agree. Should not longer be featured. --Ernie (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep -- It makes no sense to delist old FP because of size. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment if there is another featured photo of this canada goose, I support the delisting of this image. Ggia (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep - Ditto to Alvesgaspar; the pic was passed with a very strong 16:2 support rate, and removing it on size alone isn't enough. If there were other significant faults then yes, but I don't see any - MPF (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep - Ditto --Lycaon (talk) 20:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment MPF, your statement is true, however, the FP bar was much lower then. This could not possibly be featured had it been nominated now. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:39, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist For me, it is much too small to be a FP --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 13:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist Poor Resolution --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist too small size for FP -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist Too small. Steven Walling 20:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist Because of the change of FP size - probably all the old featured pictures (low size) has to be delisted in this way.. Probably the new rules has to be discussed about the issue of old featured pictures. Ggia (talk) Late vote. Lycaon (talk) 18:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment -- This is crap. Permanently re-assessing the whole FP set because quality and size are improving with technology is a useless and stupid thing to do. Pictures have dates associated with them and users are not blind or stupid. The only relevant effect of such process, which I consider negative, is to help killing the memory of FP. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 delist, 3 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /Alvesgaspar Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)