Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 20 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB 95 Mini 7s and Mini Miglia Championship.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mini racing at Castle Combe. Mattbuck 07:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Ok --Poco a poco 12:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment  Support Very good! -- Spurzem 12:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC) And Support. -- Spurzem 22:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, you can also make sharp photos in the rain. It would be better to photograph the front of the race, because then the spray of the preceding driven cars would not be seen. So nothing is in focus. --Steindy 14:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    If you only photograph the front of the race you only see the front of the race. That would be a foolish idea. Mattbuck 21:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    Why foolish? I can follow Steindys argument pretty well.--Hubertl 22:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good approach to show a race under bad weather conditions, this is well depicted. If CA is removed I'd support it. -- Smial 10:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  SupportI trust in Spurzem, him certainly understands more than me in these photos --Livioandronico2013 11:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Of course if there is CAs it needs to be corrected, but I do not see it so I support, given the conditions it's a good image. --Christian Ferrer 11:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support very good. --Ralf Roletschek 09:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Poco a poco 08:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Cleethorpes MMB 15.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The sea front at Cleethorpes. Mattbuck 14:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI -- Spurzem 12:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)/
  •  Oppose Too much motion blur. Also the driver is not in focus. --Steindy 17:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for an action shot. Nice composition. -- Smial 10:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial --Livioandronico2013 11:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Poco a poco 18:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Poco a poco 08:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Gyuu-don 001.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yoshinoya Beef Bowl, regular size. --Ocdp 12:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Please adjust white balance, it is much too orange now. --Cccefalon 12:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed OK,How is that?--Ocdp 13:24, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Not the best DoF, but IMO it can pass as QI now. --Cccefalon 21:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Still too much orange IMHO, you should go further with the WB correction --Poco a poco 08:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
     Support Current version acceptable to me Poco a poco 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed Retouched again.--Ocdp 10:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    No, not enough. I uploaded a version, that would be QI IMO but I cannot promote it. You can revert if you like, though. I also wanted to show you what I was talking about. The problem may be your monitor, that is perhaps not calibrated Poco a poco 18:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
    This is not good. store is not so bright.this is pohtograph, but not gyu-don.写真としてこれで最適化されているのかもしれませんが、実際に店内で目にする牛丼と大きくかけ離れた画像になってしまっています。 Reference Yoshinoya official site
    You can revert if you like. The image I see in the link has also a WB problem, pictures in Internet (professional or not) will not always (or rarely) meet our QI requirements Poco a poco 18:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ram-Man 14:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support current version. The problem may be of artificial light source in the room. Jkadavoor 07:26, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ FixedAlthough, I think current version is too blight relative to life. so I fixed once again.of cource I adjusted my monitor.--Ocdp (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Poco a poco 08:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Kress Building in Lubbock.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Kress Building, Lubbock, TX --Fredlyfish4 23:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Tilted CCW, needs perspective correction. --C messier 16:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support it dont need any correction. --Ralf Roletschek 13:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, please discuss. --C messier 14:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as per C messier --Cccefalon 08:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction needed.--Jebulon 20:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Poco a poco 08:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nowy_Aton,_Cerkiew_św._Szymona_Apostoła_(07).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination St. Simon the Canaanite church. New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:40, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO there is too much noise and noise fragments. --XRay 11:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. I made noise reduction. --Halavar 15:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. Masking errors all around the denoised (blurred) sky, still noise in many other parts of the image. How can this happen with a DSLR set to only ISO200? -- Smial 01:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment That is a good question. In thousands images from this trip I have a noise like this (with ISO 200 or even 100). Maybe there is some kind of problem when I convert images from RAW to JPEG. Or maybe I have a broken camera. I don't know. --Halavar 13:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have the same camera and I also notice that the pictures are quite noisy when using a higher ISO than 100. That seems to be a problem of the EOS 500D. However, it can in most cases be easily fixed with lightroom. Regarding the picture itself I stay  Neutral because I think the main subject is a little bit out of focus (the focus seems to be on the wall and the green railing in the foreground). The noise level seems to be acceptable to me right now. --Code 06:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New development from RAW using a different software. I found a problem with noise. Problem happened when image was converted from RAW to JPEG file. I think that new version of the image is better. --Halavar 01:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support, it's fine. w:en:dcraw still says 9.20, but I found a 9.22 some weeks ago. –Be..anyone 03:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok now. -- Smial 12:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support as Smial. --Hubertl 15:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. --XRay 17:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Poco a poco 08:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Limburg_an_der_Lahn-Dietkirchen-St_Lubentius_von_Osten-20120715.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination At least a quality image: the church St Lubentius in Limburg an der Lahn, Germany --Nattr 00:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 06:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Notable magenta CA at the left side / in the tree. Fixable. But please remove the inappropriate description "At least a QI". --Cccefalon 11:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The CA is somewhat disturbing. But it is of course also visble at the right side, and it is green/red (in opposite of blue/yellow CA) ;-) -- Smial 01:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA, not a QI.--Jebulon 21:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Poco a poco 08:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Ibis_escarlata_(Eudocimus_ruber),_Tierpark_Hellabrunn,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2012-06-17,_DD_01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Scarlet Ibis (Eudocimus ruber), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 09:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blurred back of the bird --Christian Ferrer 19:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I like the lights and expression on face; but per Christian. It seems some motion at tail end. Jkadavoor 07:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Poco a poco 08:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)