Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 17 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Chapel at woodland cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden sculpture “Lady chapel” (Peter Bolle, 2011) in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance gate to special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lady chapel in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remains of the former Krupp shooting and testing area (part of the wall surrounding the laboratory) in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boat on a jetty at the Johannes Brahms Promenade and Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christmas tree at the western bay on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lantern on top of the Strandschlössl on Karlstraße #14, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Venezia on Johannaweg #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Johannes-Brahms-Promenade at Jilly Beach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The skyline of Shenzhen, China. --Charlie fong 01:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The KK100 is a supertall skyscraper in Shenzhen. --Charlie fong 01:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Christopher Columbus, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaza de la Aduana, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaza de la Aduana, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaza de la Aduana, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Iglesia de San Pedro Claver, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European robin on a branch in winter --Etaped 22:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose not in focus, poor lighting --Charlesjsharp 22:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Lighting was unfortunate, would you like alternative version _01.jpg better? Additionally: I strongly suspect softness of the lense here. I could not get any sharper images even if stopped down to f/4. --Etaped 22:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A winter service vehicle cleans Andreevskaya street in Astretsovo village near Yakhroma (Moscow Oblast, Russia) on 14 February 2021 after two days of heavy snowfalls. --LexKurochkin 20:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zutphen-NL, town gate: the Berkelpoort --Michielverbeek 19:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zutphen-NL, church: the Walburgiskerk --Michielverbeek 19:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zutphen-NL, town gate: the Drogenapstoren --Michielverbeek 19:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zutphen-NL, fountain: the Wilhelminafontein --Michielverbeek 19:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little palace of the governor Haynau in the Castle of Brescia. --Moroder 18:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Turdus pilaris, Poland --1bumer 18:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose not in focus. poor lighting --Charlesjsharp 22:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Turdus pilaris, Poland --1bumer 18:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1737) near Aach, Rhineland-Palatinate. --Palauenc05 17:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of wayside cross (1858) near Newel, Rhineland-Palatinate. --Palauenc05 17:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Equality March 2020 in Katowice. By User:Silar --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summit cross of mountain Cornizzolo, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 12:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summit cross on mountain Monte Rai, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 12:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of the Esplanade in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of the Esplanade in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of the Esplanade in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of the Esplanade in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Barbados Mitre, Probata barbadensis --Llez 07:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 11:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Striated Heron (Butorides striatus). Brisbane. Australia --Bald white guy 07:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Australian Water Dragon (Intellagama Lesueurii). Brisbane, Australia --Bald white guy 07:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 08:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stereum hirsutum valse turkey tail on dead branch. Focus stack of 11 photos.
--Famberhorst 07:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Stereum hirsutum valse turkey tail on dead branch. Focus stack of 11 photos.
-
- Nomination Church in Lacroix-Barrez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Roch church in Montézic, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock beach in Mu Ko Lanta NP in Ko Lanta Yai, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Tournasol7 06:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ducal Museum in Gotha, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Genevieve church in Sainte-Genevieve-sur-Argence, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of the Five Wounds in Hirschaid --Ermell 06:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Way Chapel St.Laurentius in Kirchehrenbach --Ermell 06:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Novospassky Monastery Bell Tower and Transfiguration Cathedral --Ermell 06:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery chapel in Hirschaid --Ermell 06:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the cathedral from the city walls of Girona --Ermell 06:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Launch, Sadarghat Port. By User:Jubair1985 --RockyMasum 06:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hippeastrum The delicate beauty of the flower. Focus stack of 14 photos
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hippeastrum The delicate beauty of the flower. Focus stack of 14 photos
-
- Nomination Parkhotel at the Johannes Brahms Promenade on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christmas tree at the western bay on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Details at the northeastern corner of Villa Venezia, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boat on a jetty at the Johannes Brahms Promenade and Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trailer park for sailboats next to the Drautalbahn II on 10. Oktober Strasse, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Midnight landscape from Oratunturi, Sodankylä, Finland --Ximonic 00:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Oratunturi summit, Sodankylä, Finland --Ximonic 00:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec --Wilfredor 23:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Question There is some substantial noise in the shadows, I guess they were pushed because of the light coming from the back. Is it possible to denoise a bit? Otherwise it's a nice picture. I'd be willing to accept that noise. --Etaped 08:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Etaped:Done Thanks --Wilfredor 21:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Nice quality! --Etaped 23:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dnister river. By User:Zysko serhii --Anntinomy 22:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose IMHO to small DOF, the background is important for the picture, so it should be in focus, sorry! --Tesla Delacroix 20:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Galveston Immigration Station --Jim Evans 16:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Insufficient quality. Excesive denoise --Wilfredor 18:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Question It looks more like compression fragments to me. Starting at 200%, is this the highest quality jpeg export? --Etaped 22:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Question I've reverted to the earlier version. If the problem is still there please explain where to look and what to look for as I don't understand what you two are seeing. -- Jim Evans 13:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
In the current image there is a lot of noise or artifacts, when you try to solve it by applying denoise, it is applied excessively causing loss of details in some areas such as trees and grass --Wilfredor 15:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Thank you. Because of the noise I was probably a little heavy handed and I would have never noticed the grass. I've given it another try. Tell me what you think -- Jim Evans 00:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. better now --Wilfredor 01:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matěj Kvíčala. By User:Stepro --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Belvédere de Tréchauffé in La Forclaz, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Berlin, New Year TV show with firework 2020/2021 --Leonhard Lenz 22:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin --Wilfredor 19:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stone buildings in the upper reaches of the Yarlu river (Altay Republic, Russia) --KpokeJlJla 16:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eupatorium cannabinum in Site Natura 2000 du Mont de Grange in commune of Châtel, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Electric cable warning sign. --LexKurochkin 11:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Solanum aviculare in Abel Tasman National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 07:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 18:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scenery of the old town of Hof near the cinema. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Buildings and pylons on the left side need perspective correction.--KaiBorgeest 22:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Done Thank you, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Богадельня_на_Ивановой_Горе_2020_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Russia, Poorhouse in Proletarsky, Serpukhovsky district --Никонико962 19:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose I disagree.
chromatic aberration and jpeg artifacts in the shadown --Wilfredor 02:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Disagree with whom? --A.Savin 02:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- It was a automatic message from the voter tool. It need to be fixed --Wilfredor 02:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 02:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Peulle 09:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Bethlehem_Church_in_ISFAHAN.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bethlehem Church of New Julfa By User:Yare zaman2000 --Hanooz 09:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Great shot, and probably worth QI as-is, but possible to remove the CA in the windows? --Rhododendrites 22:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
@Rhododendrites: Is it OK now? Hanooz 21:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, that did not remove the CA (the purple along the edges of the window -- the window itself is not bright purple, of course :) -- but did remove a shadow (and left many problems behind). I would definitely revert this most recent change before fixing the CA. I see you posted it to the graphic lab -- I will leave a message there. Rhododendrites 21:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I went ahead and removed it and uploaded a new version, but that means I cannot review. :) So I will move to discuss to ensure it gets a review. Rhododendrites 21:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Support Beautiful and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 14:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --A.Savin 00:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Basel_Exhibition_demolition-20120505-RM-130836.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Demolition of Basel Exhibition Hall 3 --Ermell 07:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Motion blur on bottom --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I disagree. --Ermell 07:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Support Good quality and not very blurry. -- Ikan Kekek 09:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose A bit blurry but also composition; the left crop is cutting part of the excavator. --Peulle 01:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Peulle (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Brescia_Nord_e_Monte_Guglielmo_dai_Ronchi.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of Brescia and the Mount Guglielmo. --Moroder 22:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
tree at foreground covers significant part of the main subject. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 15:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Oppose As per other version comments: improper crop of top right corner, black editor background is visible;
Done I fixed the black upper
leftright. I don't seee anything wrong with the tree; btw its winter and fortunately it doesn't have the foliage and it is part of the landscape --Moroder 17:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Support You're objecting to some foliage in a 10,932 × 4,461 pixel photo? And the problem with the upper right corner is? -- Ikan Kekek 12:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Thanks Ikan. The problem was with the upper right corner, which i fixed --Moroder 12:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Oh, I see the problem in the original version. -- Ikan Kekek 13:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Support As the main problem is removed, I support the nomination. Please, do not count my objection. --LexKurochkin 14:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --A.Savin 00:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Zygaena_transalpina_on_Knautia_dipsacifolia_(2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Zygaena transalpina on Knautia dipsacifolia in St-Jean-d'Aulps, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 07:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. Insect not in focus --Charlesjsharp 18:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Support --Commonists 20:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H 10:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer 09:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per Charles.--Ermell 08:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:Dragonfly_in_autumn_._Cozachyi_island,_Kyiv.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Dragonfly in autumn . Cozachyi island, Kyiv --Ввласенко 07:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Quality is good but the id is too generic --Poco a poco 07:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment There are many similar types, maybe Sympetrum vulgatum. But I think I'll make a mistake when choosing -- Ввласенко 09:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
DoneI indicated the species in the description and category -- Ввласенко 08:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose not sympetrum vulgatum --Charlesjsharp 15:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment I hope colleagues can help find the correct definition of the species. -- Ввласенко 07:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H 10:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Support good quality --Geoprofi Lars 13:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Any ambiguities about the motif must be clarified prior to nomination. In the case of a QI, the motif and description must fit together without a doubt. I don't know anything about such insects.--Milseburg 15:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Question Why would it be impossible to clarify them during the nomination? Isn't the whole purpose of the give and take at QIC for people to be able to edit the file and its categories and description in suitable ways? I think if the species were specified while the nomination was at CR, it would pass. We've seen that happen before, and not allowing it would be silly when people are allowed to renominate photos after making changes. -- Ikan Kekek 12:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that clarification of categories, label, etc is part of the give and take during the review process, need not lead to rejection. Similar to improvements in PC, CA, etc that are often done during review. --Tagooty 13:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per Charles. --Kallerna 10:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose None of the wings are in focus. Comparing to 22 QI in Category:Sympetrum vulgatum, this image does not measure up to QI standards. --Tagooty 13:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose --Tesla Delacroix 20:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Declined --Peulle 09:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)