Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 04 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Water well in front of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Outside stairs to the organ gallery at the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman relief frieze fragment of a greyhound grabbing a boar (CSIR II/5, 575), exposed at the western exteriour wall of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Virgin Mary in Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon, France. --Chabe01 02:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Très jolie. Bonne qualité.. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dendermonde town hall --Trougnouf 01:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Zimmer tower in Lier, Belgium --Trougnouf 01:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Śnieżne Kotły, Krkonoše, Sudetes 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Śnieżne Kotły, Krkonoše, Sudetes 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Śnieżne Kotły, Krkonoše, Sudetes 5 --Jacek Halicki 00:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Those images are nice but the building stands out, shouldn't it be described and/or categorized? --Trougnouf 00:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)@Trougnouf: Done--Jacek Halicki 00:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality, thank you. --Trougnouf 00:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Castle of Montrésor, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 00:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Montrichard, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained-glass window of the St Anianus collegiate church of Saint-Aignan, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Illumination of Jan Kiliński Monument in Warsaw --LoMit 20:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 46 Rue Denis Papin in Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 20:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
QI already... Tournasol7 22:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farm in the Castle of Chenonceau, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 20:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
The distubing bit in the sky should be removed i think. --Ermell 21:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
QI already... Tournasol7 22:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indre river in Loches, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 20:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
This is already a Quality Image, isn’t it? ;-) --Aristeas 20:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
QI already... Tournasol7 22:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior of the Castle of Valençay, Indre, France. --Tournasol7 20:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
QI already... Tournasol7 22:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sesame Seed Ball (Candy). -- Mydreamsparrow 19:54, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not very well focused (middle of the right ball especially), non-uniform background (the top has a different shade), rather small size (doesn't fill a 4K monitor) --Trougnouf 00:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swami Agnivesh in 2019. -- Mydreamsparrow 19:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seems to me the best photo in the category, gives an overall view of the market interior without undue focus on any particular detail. --Nemo bis 19:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not the work of a Commons user. Also needs a description and I don't think it quite meets the quality requirements (best in the category is for Valued Images) --Trougnouf 00:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The coast near Stegna 1. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 19:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The coast near Stegna 2. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 19:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The coast near Stegna 4. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 19:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue des Pommières (Beynost).En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Benoît Prieur 18:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. If you like: A very little bit dark, sharpness could be a little bit better and sky could be improved. --XRay 18:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grünfink Männchen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germania.--Fischer.H 17:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Too unsharp/noisy for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Würzburg, Luitpold Hospital --KaiBorgeest 17:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Philippi, ancient theatre --Berthold Werner 16:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 20:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 16:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 16:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 16:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Satanic leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus phantasticus), Ranomafana --Charlesjsharp 11:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Satanic leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus phantasticus), Ranomafana --Charlesjsharp 11:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - Based on w:Uroplatus phantasticus, this photo is larger than life, so the sharpness is sufficient. Amazing camouflage! -- Ikan Kekek 11:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia had it as 150mm long, I've edited to 90mm! Probably the most amazing creature we saw in Madagascar. Charlesjsharp 12:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Satanic leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus phantasticus), Ranomafana --Charlesjsharp 11:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - I'd call this good quality, based on its size. -- Ikan Kekek 21:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Satanic leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus phantasticus), Ranomafana --Charlesjsharp 11:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Same remark as for 3.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek 21:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination egg of Kerguelen petrel - Oeuf de Pétrel des Kerguelen --Ercé 10:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 16:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black mill in the Weismain valley --Ermell 07:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine ref. 1700; on the road to Weismain --Ermell 07:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 16:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine 18th century; on the street Weismain-Schammendorf --Ermell 07:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 11:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of the monastery church in Weißenohe --Ermell 07:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Govanhill library - statues on Calder St side, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A statue by the main dome of Govanhill Library, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relief above the main entrance, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 34-50 Albert Road, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Regular buttercolli ( butyracea ) between fallen leaves.
--Famberhorst 07:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Regular buttercolli ( butyracea ) between fallen leaves.
-
- Nomination General R.K. Cemetery "Vitushof". Vitus chapel. (Detail wooden door).
--Famberhorst 07:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination General R.K. Cemetery "Vitushof". Vitus chapel. (Detail wooden door).
-
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. Forest biotope.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. Forest biotope.
-
- Nomination Dardin Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian. Exit from the cemetery.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Dardin Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian. Exit from the cemetery.
-
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz, Switzerland. Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri (Burg Jörgenberg).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz, Switzerland. Ruïne Casti Munt Sorn Gieri (Burg Jörgenberg).
-
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Lag da Breil. Supply of water to the reservoir.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Lag da Breil. Supply of water to the reservoir.
-
- Nomination Duméril's Madagascar swift (Oplurus quadrimaculatus), Anja Community Reserve and Isalo --Charlesjsharp 11:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fashion female model looking at the ceiling --Dorieo 08:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good enough quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 05:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parson's chameleon (Calumma parsonii cristifer) female, VOIMMA --Charlesjsharp 09:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could you fix the light spot? That looks a bit strange IMO. --Ermell 10:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Ah! but it's not a light spot Ermell, it's part of the animal's skin colour ... Charlesjsharp 11:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Looks like a hole to me, but I'm sure that you know better. --Ermell 09:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stuttgart-Feuerbach, canteen and office building of former leather factory Roser --KaiBorgeest 17:38, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Memorial of Pope John Paul II and Stefan Wyszyński in Prudnik, Poland --ElCet 17:23, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review Comment Very tight crop at the bottom. (One of the candle cases is even a bit cut off.) Otherwise good quality. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Chapel of Liebenstein castle near Neckarwestheim, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 13:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review Comment Perspective correction needed. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Done Perspective had already been corrected, but I corrected it a bit more now. -- Felix Koenig 16:30, 26 December 2018 (UTC) Comment Thank you for the perspective correction. It is good now. However now when I look closer I see typical compression artifacts. E.g. the brown color of the obelisks on the roof is a bit smeared out into the sky. The wall surface lost also detail in compression. A bit strange, because 4 MB is a lot for 6 MP. The image looks also strongly downsampled. Do you have a better original file? Otherwise I am quite sure this won't be QI for the above reasons. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Salakkakuja terrace houses in Haukilahti, Espoo. --Msaynevirta 12:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review
needs more categories --MB-one 15:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Done. --Msaynevirta 16:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:20180924_UCI_Road_World_Championships_Innsbruck_Women_Juniors_ITT_Jasmine_Soh_DSC_7535.jpg[edit]
- Nomination 2018 UCI Road World Championships Innsbruck/Tirol Women Juniors Individual Time Trial. Picture shows: Jasmine Soh (USA) --Granada 11:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Visible artifacts on the left leg (too aggressive de-noising?) --Jacek79 15:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Support[Can't vote for your own photo at QIC -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)] No denoising used at all. Maybe some quite intentionally taken motion blur (it's a sports photo) --Granada 15:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for that pro-notation, I don't know how it found it's way in there. I've just set the image to discuss per QIC-Voter like the other one. --Granada (talk) 08:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)- Support - Good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- SupportOk for me. --Isiwal 08:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Denoising artifacts, if any at all, are very, very minor, as far as I can see. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 16:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:20180924_UCI_Road_World_Championships_Innsbruck_Women_Juniors_ITT_Giorgia_Bariani_DSC_7579.jpg[edit]
- Nomination 2018 UCI Road World Championships Innsbruck/Tirol Women Juniors Individual Time Trial. Picture shows: Giorgia Bariani (ITA) --Granada 07:46, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose This one is not very sharp --Podzemnik 10:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- CommentThe face is a bit soft, regarding the high resolution imo OK for QI.--Isiwal
- Support - I agree. Good quality at 3x the size of my 13-inch laptop. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - As mentioned in my comment above. --Isiwal 08:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Support per Isiwal. And the overall impression is really very good, so the minor softness of the face is not important IMHO. --Aristeas 11:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 16:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Kenya_chikhalidwe.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Marafa-Hells Kitchen (Malindi) --E.3 06:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I don't think the quality is good enough for QI --Podzemnik 08:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Details lost by aggressive noise reduction. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Podzemnik. -- Ikan Kekek 21:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Would be a very interesting image, but the quality is unfortunately not sufficient. --Aristeas 11:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 16:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Rue_Pierre_de_Blois_in_Blois_02.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Rue Pierre de Blois in Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversharpening artifacts (halos) at full resolution. Top of chimney on the left shows a slightly offset ghost image. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Support --Moroder 21:46, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support IMHO quite good, the oversharping artifacts are not disturbing, overall impression is fine. --Aristeas 11:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 16:42, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Cow_mooing_in_Karawanks,_Slovenia.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Cow mooing in Karawanks, Slovenia --Podzemnik 08:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Looks oversaturated, and the DoF is shallow.--Peulle 13:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I reduced the saturation. Considerign DoF, it's kind OK for me, the main thing here for me is the cow's mouth and it's quite sharp. Let's see what other folks think --Podzemnik 15:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Support per comment immediately above. Poor cow, with all those flies on her(?) face! But is it really a cow and not a bull or steer, with those horns? (I know some cows have horns.) -- Ikan Kekek 19:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure it's a cow. There was a bunch of them and as you can see here, it's got horns and an udder (it's a different cow but the same group and it shows horns and an udder at the same time :). --Podzemnik 17:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Too small part of the image in focus. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC) - Oppose Eyes should be within DOF. --Smial 02:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Palauenc05 14:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Basotxerri 16:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Paris_Motor_Show_2018,_Paris_(1Y7A1246).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Nissan Micra at Mondial de l’Automobile de Paris 2018 --MB-one 10:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose For a quality picture, the roof and windshield are too bright. In addition, the advertising inscriptions are very disturbing. And what is that part at the right front wheel? Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Good quality in my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 11:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Random composition, somewhat low DOF, distracting background. --Smial 11:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support o.k. for QI in think.--Ermell 09:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose overloaded in the background, Vanneau Asocial 18:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Basotxerri 16:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Iglesia_de_San_Pedro_de_los_Francos,_Calatayud,_España,_2018-03-28,_DD_26.jpg[edit]
- Nomination The Crowning with Thorns and Veronica Procession on Maundy Thursday, St Peter of Los Francos Church, Holy Week in Calatayud, Spain. --Poco a poco 11:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Fitindia 13:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)OpposeBased on the nominator's interpretation of QI criteria this must be rejected because of the bottom crop --Charlesjsharp 11:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
based on Ikan Kekek's votes. Charlesjsharp 16:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC) - Comment This edit could be used as an example of the definition of a revenge vote. --Poco a poco 12:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Indeed it could, as could the edit on my chameleon. Please just answer my issue with your oppose and normal harmony can immediately be resumed. Charlesjsharp 13:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Good quality. The rest of that rectangular box (whatever the technical term for it is) is not necessary or important for the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Good quality IMHO, a nice image. --Aristeas 11:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 16:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Abgestumpfte_Stachelschnecke_Hexaplex_trunculus.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Hexaplex trunculus --Holleday 05:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 05:47, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
downsampled? --Charlesjsharp 10:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Comment
Hello, please have a look at my comment at the picture File:(Garden Cross Spider)_Araneus_diadematus.jpg from 22.12. (Quality images)--Holleday 18:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Can you link the page? I'm trying to link a page showing that there was no search result for that file, but doing that makes this entire discussion invisible, somehow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:05,
- Oppose not sharp enough; no response to question. Charlesjsharp 12:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Question - I don't know how to judge the sharpness. Holleday, how big was this specimen? -- Ikan Kekek 22:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Provisional Oppose, pending a clear response.The creature does look somewhat unsharp, but if it's a very small one, I'd judge it differently. According to Wikipedia, they range from 4-10 cm long, so that's quite a significant difference. -- Ikan Kekek 06:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)- Comment-Hello, now I find time to answer. The left snail shell measures 2.8 cm. The answer to the topic "downsampled" by Charlesjsharp is easy to answer: I take many photos during the year. I scale these images to 2000 x 3000 pixels to keep the amount of data on my computer as small as possible. Then I delete the original photo. When I find some time and have some pictures that I think might be interesting for the wiki project, I upload them to the wiki portal (such as rare or unusual species). Unfortunately, I don't have the time to quickly answer questions in the featured pictures, quality images, and valued images sections. Unfortunately, I can't create new categories or do complex image editing. It is not so important to me that my pictures are featured pictures, quality images or valued images. Therefore it is OK for me not to add more pictures in these areas in the future to avoid inconsistencies like this. Many greetings --Holleday 15:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Don't do that. Wikis are meant to involve discussion. Thanks for addressing these things. Support - good quality, in view of the size of the snail. -- Ikan Kekek 16:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have to say it's crazy to downsize every image when storage is so inexpensive. If you happen to take a great image, then the opportunity to showcase it will be lost for ever. For what it's worth, I delete all the obvious during the day when I have a few moments or at night. Charlesjsharp 22:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 11:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)