Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 16 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Taggenbrunn Burgruine und Weingut 12012015 135.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castle ruin Taggenbrunn, Sankt Georgen am Laengsee, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • A lot of dustspots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Corrected version (dust-spots removed) uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 08:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 08:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • always some dustspots  Oppose until it's fixed --Christian Ferrer 12:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Dust-spots removed, corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 11:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
     Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Okay now, good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support In the great vineyards you get thirsty... Good quality. --Steindy 22:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Tawau_Sabah_Masjid-Al-Khauthar-08.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tawau, Sabah: Minaret of Al-Khauthar Mosque --Cccefalon 05:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC
    Minaret seems to be tilted. --DXR 09:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC))
  • Promotion  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:05, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
    Johann Jaritz Please do not directly promote images if other users have pointed out problems! --DXR 11:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
    Thanks, DXR for the hint, I will resolve that issue this evening. --Cccefalon 12:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
    Sorry Uwe, I just rechecked and somehow I got confused by the shape. It's actually fine. --DXR 15:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
     Strong oppose Overexposed in several places. Also CAs nearely in the whole legth on the left side of the tower. --Steindy 21:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 Info It's a wall, that is directly lit by the evening sun. You still see the structure of the wall. Anyway, I changed brightnes. --Cccefalon 17:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support Per JJ, but maybe it it really slightly tilted to the right. But with buildings like this it is not easy to decide if the camera was tilted, or if the building is not perfect. Nevertheless, clearly QI to me --DKrieger 21:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support Exposure looks fine. White surface in sunshine ... white but not burnt out. --Bald white guy 13:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support slight clipping in red channel, but not disturbing. QI for me. -- Smial 16:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:District-Kudat_Sabah_Federal-Route-1-01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination District Kudat, Sabah, Malaysia: Malaysia Federal Route 1, which is part of the Trans Borneo Highway. --Cccefalon 05:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Joydeep 09:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Pale and faded background and sky. --Steindy 21:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Pale background and sky? So that is now a reason to decline... Anyway I will support, but right now I think that the denoising is a bit to strong--DXR 08:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I uploaded another version. --Cccefalon 13:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. Though the shadow parts on the first version are not that dark. --Hockei 14:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--Livioandronico2013 20:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk • contribs)
  •  Support, very good, much better background, no losses elsewhere. –Be..anyone 03:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Shangsongyuan_Yunnan_China_Weighbridge-01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Yunnan, China: Weightbridge at the left side of Jinsha River between Shangsongyuan Bridge and Shangsongyuan --Cccefalon 06:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment IMO too soft, contrast is missing.--XRay 06:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you, XRay, I added more contrast. --Cccefalon 22:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 18:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Visible CA on the left. --Steindy 21:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--Livioandronico2013 20:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support If this is "visible CA", then please have a close look at all images of this "total train station reconstruction" series. -- Smial 16:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality  Question Maybe is it slightly tilted?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done A tiny bit. I made a minor correction, thanks. --Cccefalon 15:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 Thank you. It's better--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Moosburg Mitterteich Rohrkolben 02112014 551.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Typha angustifolia on the Middle Pond, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 08:55, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lack of detail. The typha angustifolia is only dark on most area. Not QI for me --Hockei 15:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Its not a macro view, there is a much broader range to take. Therefore, and for the nice composition my promotion.--Hubertl 16:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The composition is not that good either. The grass at the top and the plant on the right side are cut. The grass on the left side below needs to be cut. For me still not QI. --Hockei 20:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support As Hubertl. Very good quality for me. --Steindy 21:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice image--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:District-Tawau_Sabah_Road-works-at-Kalabakan-Sapulut-Road-01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination District Tawau, Sabah: Road work at Kalabakan-Sapulut Road. In 2014 some 10 Kilometres still ongoing battering work. --Cccefalon 06:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Joydeep 08:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose In the middle the road is overexposed an needs a correction. --Steindy 21:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    Thank you, I checked the part. It is very bright, that's right. But the structure of the road is still visible. It's white gravel in a very strong tropical sun, so I guess, it should be ok. --Cccefalon 22:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Exposure handled well IMHO. Highlighted area isn't burnt out (not pure white) and has some detail. All in all it seems an accurate representation of a high contrast scene, having seen similar in other tropical countries. --Bald white guy 12:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Toki_Wright_Day_of_Dignity_Minneapolis_15860366371.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Toki Wright performs in Minneapolis, Minnesota --Tony Webster 04:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Review  Support Very good.--ArildV 09:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
    I agree, but before promoting, a valid category should be available. --Cccefalon 10:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
    Categories fixed! —Tony Webster 07:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    "Toki Wright" is still a redlink. I'm not good in this kind of music, but it should be able to find a superior category for the singer. --Cccefalon 07:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose Good composition and nice colors, but some over-exposed sites on the right sleeve. Sorry! --Steindy 00:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Redlink fixed, and checked in the photo editor – nothing is peaking white as over-exposed, it's just the sun. Thanks! –Tony Webster 03:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  •  Support --Livioandronico2013 20:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Rather unsharp for a photo in bright sunshine, too low DOF. It is possible to stop down a f/2.8 Lens. Channel clipping (as for steindy). -- Smial 14:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --C messier 12:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)