Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 17 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Monument_to_Giuseppe_Mazzini_-_Statue.jpg[edit]

File:London MMB »071 Cabot Square.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cabot Square. Mattbuck 13:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)*  Comment IT IS TOO DARK! Even in England, people in cities don´t have to use torch light, when they walk on publc places. --Hubertl 17:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Mattbuck 21:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose  Not done --Hubertl 14:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Even the new version has not the real light-situation - Its just dark. --Hubertl 14:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
    That is called "night". The photo accurately reflects conditions. Mattbuck 23:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

 Support For me is good,night is dark...--Livioandronico2013 09:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  •  Support It's acceptable IMO... and I already saw day photos nominated in this page with the shadows much more dark than this ... --Christian Ferrer 19:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 12:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Sculptures of Roman theater masks in Baths of Diocletian.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Theatre masks in Baths of Diocletian --Livioandronico2013 08:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support A bit noisy but still QI for me -- Spurzem 08:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, not because of the quality, its because of the wrong description. I already changed the category, but the description is completely wrong. It is not a theatre mask, its a Gargoyle. --Hubertl 08:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    But please, stop this deleted least informed before the Latin theater--Livioandronico2013 08:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Personal attack removed. --Steindy 22:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    To say that a statement is stupid is not an Personal attack, it is not personal --Livioandronico2013 17:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • You should think twice about what you write. If you are referring to a comment from another user is stupid indeed is a personal attack!  Oppose for the strong chromatic noise. --Steindy 23:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
This your comment is stupid too, a personal attack is to the person not to the opinion....is so complicated for you?--Livioandronico2013 00:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 12:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)