Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 09 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Cologne_Germany_Cologne-Gay-Pride-2016_Parade-020a.jpg[edit]

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 03:26, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feldkirchen Amthofgasse Filialkirche hl Michael Sakristei-Eingang 02072016 3567.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sacristy`s portal of the subsidiary church Saint Michael on Ossiacherstrasse, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC),
  •  Oppose A hard elements in color up or cealing don't is a good effect in composition for me. --Marrovi 18:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Tsungam 07:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --C messier 09:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not sure what the opposer means, good quality. --A.Savin 13:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Schönes Bild. -- Spurzem 14:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 03:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Rally_de_Ourense_2016_-_Alberto_MONARRI_y_Rodrigo_SAN_JUAN_-_TC9_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: '49 TRally de Ourense ' in 2016, in the city of Ourense, scoring for the CERA. --Harpagornis 23:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Looks good. :) --Peulle 14:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree : Slight magenta CA around the heads left side. Fixable. --Cccefalon 04:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 03:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)