Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 18 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Paris-Charles_de_Gaulle_Airport,_Roissy_(SIAE2160).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Armee de L'Air Airbus A340 at Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport --MB-one 09:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Isiwal 15:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. From the back, the plane is not well shown here. Moving to the right or left might have avoided the light pole coming out of the wing. There is a sun flare on the right edge. Sorry - this says not QI to me. --GRDN711 02:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose We also need QI from the back of the aircraft. But the flare is a pity. --Milseburg 11:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 02:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Кургальский_полуостров,_протока,_соединяющая_Липовское_озеро_с_Финским_заливом_1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kurgalsky Peninsula --Olga Dobrosinska 07:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose nice mood, but strong artifacts and very low sharpness in the whole series, sorry --Carschten 09:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Carschten --Milseburg 09:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 02:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Кургальский_полуостров,_протока,_соединяющая_Липовское_озеро_с_Финским_заливом.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kurgalsky Peninsula --Olga Dobrosinska 07:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose nice mood, but strong artifacts and very low sharpness in the whole series, sorry --Carschten 09:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 06:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too noisy. --Milseburg 09:28, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 02:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Крылатка-зебра._Океанариум_"Галактика",_город_Когалым.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Крылатка-зебра. Океанариум "Галактика", город Когалым --Ольга Слотвинская 11:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Beautiful fish and good quality -- Spurzem 11:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No categories at all and not really good quality for an aquarium picture --Poco a poco 15:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • @Poco a poco: Please look now. I see first the image and later perhaps the category. -- Spurzem 16:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
    Perhaps? well, specific categories and a proper description are a must, not a perhaps. The image lacks detail although it was an easy shot behind a window Poco a poco 17:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor quality in general, details lost, a lot of CAs (@Poco a poco: Aquarium photos are not always "an easy shot behind a window", they have other challenges as underwater photos, but they have.) --Llez 04:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
    Clearly, Llez, dealing with windows and flashes is not trivial, but still no comparison to me Poco a poco 17:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support not an FP, but a QI Seven Pandas 20:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 08:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 02:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)