Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 12 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Stavoren. View of the fish fountain. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stavoren. View of the fish fountain.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination South facade of Monte di Pietà nuovo. --Moroder 04:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination South facade of Monte di Pietà nuovo. --Moroder 04:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Inscription COR GAVDENTIVS. --Moroder 04:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Inscription COR GAVDENTIVS. --Moroder 04:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gallery western facade of the Monte di Pietà vecchio palace. --Moroder 04:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gallery western facade of the Monte di Pietà vecchio palace. --Moroder 04:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Willow branches over the pond water. K. L. Khetagurov Park of Culture and Recreation: Vladikavkaz, North Ossetia. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Willow branches over the pond water. K. L. Khetagurov Park of Culture and Recreation: Vladikavkaz, North Ossetia. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chegemskaya "tightness" - the narrowest place of the Chegemsky gorge. Chegem gorge: Chegem district, Kabardino-Balkaria. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Chegemskaya "tightness" - the narrowest place of the Chegemsky gorge. Chegem gorge: Chegem district, Kabardino-Balkaria. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Volkhov open spaces. Staroladozhsky: Staraya Ladoga, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad Region. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Volkhov open spaces. Staroladozhsky: Staraya Ladoga, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad Region. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The banks of the Lava River. Lava River canyon: Kirovsky district, Leningrad Region. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination The banks of the Lava River. Lava River canyon: Kirovsky district, Leningrad Region. Russia --Александр Байдуков 04:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Babies of Russia --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Babies of Russia --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Babies of Russia --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Babies of Russia --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Acacia. Caragana arborescens. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Acacia. Caragana arborescens. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fragaria vesca. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fragaria vesca. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fragaria vesca. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fragaria vesca. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 04:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Windows of the Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 03:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Windows of the Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 03:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Guesthouse Hemmaberg in Slovenjach #15, Globasnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Guesthouse Hemmaberg in Slovenjach #15, Globasnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Archaeological site on Hemmaberg, Globasnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Archaeological site on Hemmaberg, Globasnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rosalia grotto on Hemmaberg, Globasnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rosalia grotto on Hemmaberg, Globasnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Baptismal font in the Protestant church in Busbach --Ermell 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Baptismal font in the Protestant church in Busbach --Ermell 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Evangelic church in Krögelstein --Ermell 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Evangelic church in Krögelstein --Ermell 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Official residence in Neunkirchen am Brand --Ermell 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Official residence in Neunkirchen am Brand --Ermell 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Madonna and Child - Massimo Stanzione --Commonists 14:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Madonna and Child - Massimo Stanzione --Commonists 14:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Detail of the walls of defense of Valença, Portugal. --Lmbuga 13:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Detail of the walls of defense of Valença, Portugal. --Lmbuga 13:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Rome seen from Viale della Trinita dei Monti, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Rome seen from Viale della Trinita dei Monti, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) on a tower crane --F. Riedelio 11:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) on a tower crane
      --F. Riedelio 11:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Five Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni boettgeri) at lunch. --Palauenc05 10:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion --Knopik-som 11:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Five Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni boettgeri) at lunch. --Palauenc05 10:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion --Knopik-som 11:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Knyazhoe Lake in Tambov Oblast of Russia --Alexander Novikov 10:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Knyazhoe Lake in Tambov Oblast of Russia --Alexander Novikov 10:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Сорокопуд-жулан User:Константинъ --Константинъ 10:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Blurred and noisy --Tagooty 13:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chichester Cathedral High Altar by User:Diliff --RoanokeVirginia 10:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portsmouth RC Cathedral Nave by User:Diliff --RoanokeVirginia 10:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ceps bridge --Christian Ferrer 10:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ceps bridge --Christian Ferrer 10:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Facade of the Monte di Pietà vecchio palace. --Moroder 09:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Facade of the Monte di Pietà vecchio palace. --Moroder 09:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Saint Blaise church in Meljac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 09:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Saint Blaise church in Meljac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 09:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rue Saint-Vital in Sauveterre-de-Rouergue, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 09:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rue Saint-Vital in Sauveterre-de-Rouergue, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 09:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Windows of the castle of Taurines in commune of Centres, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 09:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Windows of the castle of Taurines in commune of Centres, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 09:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Coat of arms on Villa Vergine Muchetti in Brescia. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Coat of arms on Villa Vergine Muchetti in Brescia. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Antique Roman inscription A.D. second century on Monte di Pietà. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Antique Roman inscription A.D. second century on Monte di Pietà. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Antique Roman inscription A.D. second century. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Antique Roman inscription A.D. second century. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Inscription on Monte di Pietà vecchio palace on Piazza della Loggia. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Inscription on Monte di Pietà vecchio palace on Piazza della Loggia. --Moroder 07:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Art Deco house, rue de la Bassée 88, Lille, France --Velvet 07:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Art Deco house, rue de la Bassée 88, Lille, France --Velvet 07:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Eclectic house, Rue de Canteleu 51, Lille, France --Velvet 07:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Eclectic house, Rue de Canteleu 51, Lille, France --Velvet 07:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rape field in the Stockum hamlet in Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rape field in the Stockum hamlet in Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination War memorial window in the St. Agatha Church in Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination War memorial window in the St. Agatha Church in Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Nature reserve “Roruper Holz” (COE-045) in the Hanrorup hamlet near Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Nature reserve “Roruper Holz” (COE-045) in the Hanrorup hamlet near Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Farm road in the Welte hamlet in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Farm road in the Welte hamlet in Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Nature reserve “Roruper Holz” (COE-045) in the Hanrorup hamlet near Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Nature reserve “Roruper Holz” (COE-045) in the Hanrorup hamlet near Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Banks of the Volkhov River. Staroladozhsky: Staraya Ladoga, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad Region. Russia --Александр Байдуков 03:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Banks of the Volkhov River. Staroladozhsky: Staraya Ladoga, Volkhovsky district, Leningrad Region. Russia --Александр Байдуков 03:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Reserva Biológica Marinha do Arvoredo de nível Federal, By User:Sovernigo --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Reserva Biológica Marinha do Arvoredo de nível Federal, By User:Sovernigo --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses de nível Federal, By User:Sovernigo --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses de nível Federal, By User:Sovernigo --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses By User:Sovernigo --Rodrigo.Argenton 17:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 10:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: SBB ETR 610 meets a RABDe 500 above Wassen (Switzerland) on the Gotthard line (By David Gubler) --Remontees 00:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: SBB ETR 610 meets a RABDe 500 above Wassen (Switzerland) on the Gotthard line (By David Gubler) --Remontees 00:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: SBB ETR 610 running as EuroCity 37 from Geneva to Venice seen in Salgesch, Switzerland. (By David Gubler) --Remontees 00:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: SBB ETR 610 running as EuroCity 37 from Geneva to Venice seen in Salgesch, Switzerland. (By David Gubler) --Remontees 00:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Aerial view of the village Wallsee-Sindelburg with Wallsee castle. In the background the Hydroelectric power plant Wallsee-Mitterkirchen --Hans Koberger 13:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Aerial view of the village Wallsee-Sindelburg with Wallsee castle. In the background the Hydroelectric power plant Wallsee-Mitterkirchen --Hans Koberger 13:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Monument to Anita Garibaldi in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Monument to Anita Garibaldi in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Monument to Giuseppe Garibaldi in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Monument to Giuseppe Garibaldi in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Building at Via della Luce 37 in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Building at Via della Luce 37 in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination A China Railways SS8 hauling a passenger train (by N509FZ) --廣九直通車 05:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Slightly tilted to the right. --Remontees 21:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)  Question@Remontees: Is the composition of this image is not on par with the standard of QI?廣九直通車 09:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination A China Railways SS8 hauling a passenger train (by N509FZ) --廣九直通車 05:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Slightly tilted to the right. --Remontees 21:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
       Question@Remontees: Is the composition of this image is not on par with the standard of QI?廣九直通車 09:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Antonov An-2 biplane at the "Nebo" festival in 2021, Moscow Oblast. --Kirill Borisenko 22:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Nice scene and mood. The image looks a bit overprocessed (as phone pictures usually do), but is not that bad and IMHO good enough for QI. --Domob 09:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Antonov An-2 biplane at the "Nebo" festival in 2021, Moscow Oblast. --Kirill Borisenko 22:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Nice scene and mood. The image looks a bit overprocessed (as phone pictures usually do), but is not that bad and IMHO good enough for QI. --Domob 09:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kosher spam isn't a real thing. --Angry Red Hammer Guy 16:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)  Request An additional category please --Moroder 01:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)  Done @Moroder: I added the categories "Kosher" and "Supermarket shelves in Canada". What do you think? * Promotion Good quality. Perfect! --Moroder 13:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kosher spam isn't a real thing. --Angry Red Hammer Guy 16:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)  Request An additional category please --Moroder 01:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC) ✓ Done @Moroder: I added the categories "Kosher" and "Supermarket shelves in Canada". What do you think?
    • Promotion Good quality. Perfect! --Moroder 13:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Road signs at lake Untreu. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC) * Promotion The mast tilts slightly to the right. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thank you, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 11:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
    • Nomination Road signs at lake Untreu. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      The mast tilts slightly to the right. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Thank you, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
       Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 11:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Schopfkarakara.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Side door of the Sant'Agata in Trastevere church in Rome, Lazio, Italy. Southern crested caracara (Caracara plancus) (by Merops). --Geoprofi Lars 10:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support The description of the file here is wrong, but good quality in my opinion. I wish User:Merops made it a lot easier to tell that he is the same user as Andreas Trepte linked to www.photo-natur.de. I was going to decline this nomination until I did the detective work of looking at Merops' user page and seeing the same link there. As it is, I'd like to be surer that it's OK to make a photo initially uploaded to another site a QI here, and this might merit a discussion at Consensual Review. Merops, could you please sign your photos with your Commons username in addition to the link to your website? -- Ikan Kekek 09:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until file name description changed --Charlesjsharp 21:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC) Charlesjsharp 12:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
    • What is so wrong about the file name? It is apparently the German name for this bird. The image is used on the respective German Wikipedia page, de:Schopfkarakara. The image description in the nomination is nonsense. This is a bird, not a church door, but this is just a mistake here on the QI candidate page, not on the original file page. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
      • I have taken the freedom to fix the description here, hope it helps. On the image page itself it was already OK. --Aristeas 09:38, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Aristeas 09:38, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Puerto_de_la_Cruz._Tenerife._Illas_Canarias_eue_007.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.. 007 --Lmbuga 12:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The sea/sky are blurred and indistinguishable. The foreground is distracting. --Tagooty 08:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Fog is fog. To me it's QI --Lmbuga 19:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per above remark. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. The image composition is not necessarily overwhelmingly good, but the technical quality is ok and the imaging seems natural. --Smial 10:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Snowdon_Wishing_post.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wishing post with coins near the top of the Pyg Trail, Yr Wyddfa. By User:Jason.nlw
  • Decline  Support Good quality and nice. -- Ikan Kekek 21:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose hills are out of focus and composition deliberately includes them --Charlesjsharp 21:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Includes them as background, much as if you had photographed an eagle in a similar context. -- Ikan Kekek 21:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
     Support The enormousness of the mountains are unimportant, compared to the wish of an individual. Focus / unfocus is deliberate and a strong metaphore. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    I removed the vote by the nominator User:Llywelyn2000 (see below). --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The top of this post is surprisingly and very disturbingly out of focus. --Smial 10:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question Who nominated this image? There is no signature by the nominator. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Savannah_Clouds_Nairobi_National_Park_Kenya_May19_R1600795.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Savannah and clouds, Nairobi National Park, Kenya --Tagooty 09:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Poor exposure. --Remontees 22:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • The exposure represents the partly overcast conditions. --Tagooty 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Artistic, but I feel like all the ground is blurred. -- Ikan Kekek 07:42, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Dramatic scene, fine for me. --Palauenc05 09:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ground is blurred and noisy. --Jakubhal 11:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jakubhal & Remontees. Under/overexposed. Nefronus 11:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Setting the ISO value too high limits the usable contrast range. Compared to the basic sensitivity of the camera sensor, two to three f-stops are lost, which often results in a lack of details in bright parts of the image and unnecessarily noisy areas in dark parts. --Smial 12:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Mariánské_Lázně,_Nehrova_2020_(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Mehrova street in Mariánské Lázně, Czechia --T.Bednarz 23:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Low light level. --Remontees 22:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Could be a bit brighter, but still acceptable. QI. --C messier 21:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dust spots need to be eliminated. Might be too dark, but that depends on how many clouds there were and where. -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Mariánské_Lázně,_bývalý_hotel_Weimar_2020_(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Former hotel Weimar in Mariánské Lázně, Czechia --T.Bednarz 23:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Tilted+lack of light. --Remontees 22:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  SupportSome minor CAs, but composition and exposure are OK. --C messier 21:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Tamizhagam_Ooty_Western_Catchment_Nilgiris_Dec15_DSC01197.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tamizhagam (residence), Ooty and Western Catchment range, Nilgiris, India --Tagooty 06:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose unbalanced composition+poor exposure. --Remontees 22:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    I request other opinions, please. --Tagooty 16:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I can see from the histogram that the exposure is well balanced. QI also for the composition --Moroder 09:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Moroder. Maybe by pulling the sliders (s-curving) you could improve a little something in the rendering of the trees, but actually the photo is good enough as it is. --Smial 12:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Arts_College_Hill_Ooty_Nilgiris_Mar21_A7C_00188.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Govt Arts College hill and Dodabetta Peak, Ooty, India. --Tagooty 06:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose unbalanced composition --Remontees 22:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    Please explain what is unbalanced about the composition. --Tagooty 10:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Minimally oversharpened, otherwise good. --Smial 12:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Marlimund_Lake_Ooty_Nilgiris_Dec15_DSC01213.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Marlimund Lake, Ooty, India. --Tagooty 12:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Poor composition and exposure. --Remontees 22:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    With the rising sun low in the sky, there is deep shade in the foreground. --Tagooty 10:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support This construction on the right edge of the image looks a little distorted.Otherwise, the photo is very good, very nice lighting and natural-looking colours and contrasts. --Smial 13:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:03-Kampong_Phluk-nX-35.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Kampong Phluk (low water levels) --PsamatheM 16:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Request Needs a better file description--Moroder 03:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Re: File Description: I generally centralise information in the category page/WikiData/structured data rather than put loads of detail on every image of the place e.g. Wikidata (via Category says "commune in Cambodia" so should every image state "Kampong Phluk commune in Cambodia"? (Not disagreeing, more how much detail duplication is appropriate and how much centralised). --PsamatheM 15:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  • As far as I know, the subject of the photo, not just its location, should be understandable from the description, see e. g. Commons:First_steps/Quality_and_description#Good_file_descriptions. So what about "Stilt houses in Kampong Phluk floating village, Cambodia" (if this is correct)? --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 09:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Most people who are browsing for an image look at the filename first, then perhaps at the caption/description. Other than seasoned editors/contributors, very few people understand the Category system and the structured tags/Wikidata. The Commons search engines do not search these fields (perhaps there is some advanced search that I'm not aware of).
    E.g. One often wants to know the country of an image. As the category hierarchy can be deep, one may have to navigate up through many parent categories to figure out the country. Each navigation step requires scrolling down to the bottom of the page and clicking on one of several Categories. Quite tedious.
    I make sure that all reasonable info/keywords about an image are in the filename and/or caption and/or description. This makes the image page self-contained for the non-expert person, and facilitates 1-click searching. It is extra work and duplication, but improves the chance that my images will be used by someone! --Tagooty 09:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment QIC rules request a proper filename, description and categorization! --Moroder 09:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • @Robert Flogaus-Faust, Moroder, and Tagooty: Sorted (a genuine lack on understanding on my part, not disagreeing but from a technical background I err towards non-duplication by default. I've learnt something new). --PsamatheM 09:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_June_12_2021&oldid=568636350"