Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 02 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
-
- Nomination Tetrameles nudiflora in Ta Prohm, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 18:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 21:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saruma henryi. Beautiful plant in semi-shade with velvety leaves cuddly.--
Famberhorst 17:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion OK. --JLPC 21:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Saruma henryi. Beautiful plant in semi-shade with velvety leaves cuddly.--
-
- Nomination Detail of main building of "Villa Köster" in Klausen South Tyrol --Moroder 16:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Statue of Louise of Savoy (1851), by Jean-Baptiste Auguste Clésinger, jardin du Luxembourg, Paris (6th arr.) --JLPC 16:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Nymphaea capensis flower --Aathavan jaffna 15:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nymphaea capensis flower --Aathavan jaffna 15:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hot air balloon ride at sunrise in Uçhisar in Cappadocia Turkey (2nd version) --Moroder 15:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
lens distortion --The Photographer 00:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Tank truck in front of the piping bridge between the Rhineland Refinery Godorf and Oil Harbour Godorf in Cologne, Germany --Cccefalon 14:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 15:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Shell of a Granular Limpet, Patella granularis --Llez 12:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent quality --The Photographer 13:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chimay bleu, belgian beer --Ludo29 12:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. (perhaps ISO 100 would have been better) --Berthold Werner 12:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Block and tackle --Ludo29 12:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality but please, add additional specific categories. --Poco a poco 21:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic of Juan Griego --The Photographer 12:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support --A.Savin 13:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --A.Savin 13:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Triumph Spitfire 1500 --Rolf H. 07:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline CA. Retouching leftovers at the plate. In general, photos with extinguished plate numbers cannot be QI because it is a too obvious change of the reality; similar to pixelated faces. Also the empty area are looks strange. --Cccefalon 07:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Amiens, France: Fassade detail of the Cathedrale of Amiens --Cccefalon 05:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good image and composition. --Balon Greyjoy 02:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mongols on the way to the stadium during the Naadam festival. Ulan Bator, Mongolia. --Halavar 22:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The centre of the composition seems to be the cloud which moreover is clipped. The riders are unfocused and too dark. Plus noise, pixelated sky. --A.Savin 13:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The main artificial waterfall in the Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, pictured in grotta, which surrounds it --DXR 21:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Nasty purple area next to the overexposed area Poco a poco 21:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Removed it as far as possible. The contrast was obvs. extreme and the halo is very unequally purple so tried what I could. --DXR 21:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
I am still reluctant, maybe you can compensate the overexposure in the rocks decreasing locally the luminosity Poco a poco 19:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC) - Withdrawn Fair enough, will try photoshopping it when I find the time. --DXR 20:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The main artificial waterfall in the Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, pictured in grotta, which surrounds it --DXR 21:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common toad (Bufo bufo), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 18:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good picture, well composed --Balon Greyjoy 22:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bayon, Angkor Thom, Cambodia --Poco a poco 18:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JDP90 09:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 18:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --A.Savin 13:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road marker neat to Løgten Aarhus --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Is the picture tilted or the marker? Poco a poco 18:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
It is the marker, most markers is tilted a bit. --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 18:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Road marker neat to Løgten Aarhus --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The big minarette of Sabah State Mosque in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah --Cccefalon 17:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Looks ccw tilted Poco a poco 18:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Done Yeah, there was a minimal rotation. --Cccefalon 19:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The big minarette of Sabah State Mosque in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah --Cccefalon 17:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Fishing net, Étang de Thau --Christian Ferrer 16:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Bgag 16:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination The market hall of Pekan Nabalu, Sabah seen from the watch tower. --Cccefalon 13:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Perspective issues, lack of sharpness, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 18:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
* As it was shot from top of a watch tower, it is not possible to get it rectified. However, on a second look, I find the radio tower top left too much inclined. That's too disturbing and I withdraw the photo. --Cccefalon 08:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amiens, France: Fassade detail of the Cathedrale of Amiens, showing the left group of sculptures under the rosette window --Cccefalon 07:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Is the whitebalance correct? --Berthold Werner 11:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Yes, I checked against File:Amiens_France_Cathédrale-Notre-Dame-d-Amiens-01.jpg, it is same temperature and tint. --Cccefalon 19:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Support Then it's QI --Berthold Werner 06:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Amiens, France: Fassade detail of the Cathedrale of Amiens, showing the left group of sculptures under the rosette window --Cccefalon 07:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crete: Bay of Malia --Taxiarchos228 04:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC). Three dustspots in the sky. --Cayambe 08:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Cayambe: I found even more than three, I hope I´ve got them all cleared now --Taxiarchos228 20:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Ok now. --Cayambe 06:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Crete: Bay of Malia --Taxiarchos228 04:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC). Three dustspots in the sky. --Cayambe 08:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capri, Marina grande --Berthold Werner 17:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
QI when the highlights are reduced a bit imo. --JLPC 16:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Done --Berthold Werner 17:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
OK : better now. --JLPC 13:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Capri, Marina grande --Berthold Werner 17:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Nallikari observation tower on the Nallikari beach in Oulu. --Estormiz 13:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion * Needs perspective correction. Also a reddish CA on the roof. --Cccefalon 13:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
* I agree to the CA problem. But a perspective correction would lead to massive distortions. The camera is obvisiously pointing upstairs so it is absolutely natural to see leaning verticals. A small composition issue: this symmetrical composed image is not perfectly symmetric, but this small issue should not lead to a decline. Only the CA is really disturbing. -- Smial 11:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm aware of that problem. PC cannot be applied everywhere, but as there is still some space at the top, it might be worth a try. If it is not working, it can be QI though, I won't be stubborn in that case. --Cccefalon 11:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
I tried to reduce CA with Canon's software, but I am not sure if it really worked out. --Estormiz 16:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok for me. I won't be more catholic than the pope. --Cccefalon 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
* CA fixed, also full Support now. --Smial 08:37, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War Memorial. The child is still there (is in Echten, Friesland)--
Famberhorst 04:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Might it be, that the composition is tilted ccw? --Cccefalon 06:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment I'm not sure. The photo of the entire image can be found at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Echten,_%27Het_kind_is_er_nog%27_05.JPG. What is your opinion?--
Famberhorst 16:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
The background is leaning ccw (facade, windows, board ...), so it is obvious, that there is a tilt. --Cccefalon 07:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Done Small correction. Thank you.--
Famberhorst 16:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Welcome. --Cccefalon 14:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination War Memorial. The child is still there (is in Echten, Friesland)--
-
- Nomination The Neues Rathaus of Munich, as seen from the top of the church tower of Alter Peter. --High Contrast 23:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Perspective/Tilt (cw) --Cccefalon 06:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC) --High Contrast 14:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walchensee hydroelectric power plant, Kochel, Bavaria, Germany --Poco a poco 17:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but it is a bit too twisted and tilted. --High Contrast 14:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frame house in Oberhörlen. --Hydro 08:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Magenta CA. Perspective not done. Might be fixable. --Cccefalon 08:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Oppose nothing done --Christian Ferrer 11:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Seedling of Clitoria ternatea. --Bff 13:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
_-_Swedish_chapel.JPG)
_001.JPG)
,_Hartelholz,_M%C3%BAnich,_Alemania,_2014-03-29,_DD_02.JPG)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Saqqara pyramid.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Saqqara stepped pyramid --Charlesjsharp 12:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Halavar 14:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
I disagree - there is a big dustspot. --Cccefalon 16:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thank you for spotting the dust spot. Now gone. --Charlesjsharp 08:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Support Good then; case can be closed in two days without further waiting IMO. --Cccefalon 10:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → 
Promoted --Cccefalon 05:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 05:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)File:Byland Abbey MMB 05.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Byland Abbey. Mattbuck 16:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Good, maybe slightly tilted, though? --Poco a poco 21:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's quite possible it's tilted in reality, probable even. Mattbuck 16:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor lighting -- Sanyambahga 17:41, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The climate is not conducive to providing a poor light today --The Photographer 12:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- We call that England! Mattbuck 17:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment light is acceptable IMO (even a good image for the light) but I'm with Poco it's tilted and/or perspectives --Christian Ferrer 16:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The sun comes out in England and improves photographs. I agree with "Poor Lighting" review --Charlesjsharp 08:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Muffin,_Ciudad_Ho_Chi_Minh,_Vietnam,_2013-08-14,_DD_01.JPG
[edit]
- Nomination Muffin, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 03:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Maathavan 12:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I'd like a discussion about my annotations, please.--Jebulon 15:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- New version with selective denoising Poco a poco 21:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Slightly better for the noise, but in comparison, (no offense) I prefer "my" DoF of my crown than "yours" of your cake
--Jebulon 14:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC) - Oppose Noise reduction solved noise problem but We have a DoF problem can't be fixed --The Photographer 12:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose As for The Photographer -- Smial 18:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
