Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 10 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Panorama.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Panorama.
-
- Nomination Atronomical clock at the Old Town Hall Prague, Czech Republic --Uoaei1 03:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Hradčany to the Old Town of Prague, Czech Republic --Uoaei1 03:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Towers of Týn Church in the Old Town of Prague, Czech Republic --Uoaei1 03:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve “Zwillbrocker Venn” (BOR-008), Vreden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Michael in Oberjeserz, Velden, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the subsidiary church Saint Michael in Oberjeserz, Velden, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic fresco of Saint Michael at the west wall inside the porch of the subsidiary church Saint Michael in Oberjeserz, Velden, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic fresco of Madonna and Child at the west wall inside the porch of the subsidiary church Saint Michael in Oberjeserz, Velden, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porch of the subsidiary church Saint Michael in Oberjeserz, Velden, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Syringa vulgaris flowers in Bozouls, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 22:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 23:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Assier, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 22:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurry in the upper right corner. That can't be fixed. --Halavar 23:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Assier, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 22:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 22:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old housesin the village of Saint-Jean-de-Buèges, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 21:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 22:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sonoma chipmunk (Tamias sonomae) at Samuel P. Taylor State Park --Frank Schulenburg 19:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 20:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harley-Davidson "Dyna Street Bob" --Livioandronico2013 18:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tribe of a dead Robinia, false acacia.
--Famberhorst 17:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Tribe of a dead Robinia, false acacia.
-
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, (garden) Bridge over the pond.
--Famberhorst 17:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion The sky is very bright but still OK for me. Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Done. Correction Thank you.
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, (garden) Bridge over the pond.
-
- Nomination Statue on the apses of the San Marcuola church in Venice. --Moroder 16:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tinder fungus on pine. --W.carter 16:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madonna and Child with Saint John the Baptist and Saint John the Evangelist (Madonna of the carpet) fresco by Vincenzo Foppa AD 1485 in the Galleria Franchetti,Ca' d'Oro, Venice. --Moroder 16:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walls of the old city of Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 15:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion ok 4 me..Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 17:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate of the Nations, Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 15:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 15:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of the Shirvanshahs, Baku, Azerbaijan --Poco a poco 15:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gediminas Tower in Vilnius, Lithuania at sunset. --Pofka 15:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality. --Retignano 17:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Commons:Quality images candidates#Creator : "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible." --Christian Ferrer 21:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remembering Christmas in Vilnius, Lithuania... --Pofka 15:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Nice atmosphere, very well captured. --Cayambe 19:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC) "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible." --Christian Ferrer 21:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mindaugas Bridge at night in Vilnius, Lithuania. --Pofka 14:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible." --Christian Ferrer 21:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter cityscape of Vilnius, Lithuania. --Pofka 14:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible." --Christian Ferrer 21:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Preah Tineang Phhochani. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 14:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protests opposing --The Photographer 14:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 19:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indian oakleaf or dead leaf (Kallima inachus). By User:Sumita Roy Dutta --Moheen Reeyad 11:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Aachen, cathedral --Berthold Werner 10:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wulflam-Haus in Stralsund --JoachimKohlerBremen 10:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portrait of Carlo and Marion von Hornstein Franchetti (Son and wife of Giorgio Franchetti) by Franz von Lenbach in the Galleria Franchetti,Ca' d'Oro, Venice. --Moroder 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A natural stand of the endemic spurge Euphorbia handiensis, Jandía, Fuerteventura --Llez 09:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former schoolhouse (build about 1650) in Trogen/Switzerland --JoachimKohlerBremen 09:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion IMHO not 100% perfectly straight verticals, but still OK for me. --Tuxyso 09:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Supermarket E.Leclerc in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Supermarket E.Leclerc in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Supermarket E.Leclerc in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 10:40, 7. May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Horton Plains National Park, Sri Lanka --Price Zero 08:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Unfortunately sky is overexposed --DXR 08:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An east view of the Musée des Ursulines de Trois-Rivières --DXR 07:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Top of the tower could have been slightly sharper with, for example, F8. But good for me.--Famberhorst 16:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view of Downtown Montréal as seen from Mont Royal --DXR 07:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality--JoachimKohlerBremen 08:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A southwest view of Porte Kent, Québec City --DXR 07:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An east view of the Arts Building at McGill University, Montréal --DXR 07:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landerra - sports venues of Elburgo. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 07:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drinking fountain "Damaiturri" near Urkizu in the mountains of Tolosa. Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 07:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Footway in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 07:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village house in Larraona, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 07:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit in the church in Herrnsdorf --Ermell 07:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chancel in the church in Herrnsdorf --Ermell 07:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breeding Swan in the NSG Weiherkette north of Bösenbechhofen --Ermell 07:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Almost everyone can shoot a swan swimming on a lake but this one is different, very good! Could you add some swan-related category, please? --Basotxerri 07:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 07:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the Schlüsselau monastery church --Ermell 07:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of SS. Peter and Paul in Chełmno, Poland --1bumer 07:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion I like this partial view. If you can give them, English descriptions are appreciated. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Done Thanks! 1bumer 07:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints James and Nicholas church in Chełmno, Poland --1bumer 07:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Field Gun, World War I Trophy in front of Karnataka Government Museum at Department of Archaeology and Museums --Krishna Chaitanya Velaga 06:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline BMW adverstising is distracting IMO, sorry --Cvmontuy 03:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque in Hesperange, Luxembourg. --Cayambe 06:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good use of DoF. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The "Rio dei Mendicanti" canal in Venice. --Moroder 05:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Himantopus himantopus (Black-winged stilt) --Christian Ferrer 05:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Jakubhal 05:35, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fishing nets in the neighborhood of Pointe Courte. Sète --Christian Ferrer 05:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Markeliñe theatre in the show "Andante" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Main person is good in focus --Michielverbeek 06:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Circus Ferus theatre in the show "Heart of Poland" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Circus Ferus theatre in the show "Heart of Poland" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clocks Chairs in Friesland Klokkenstoel Teroele in the Fryske Marren (Netherlands).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Clocks Chairs in Friesland Klokkenstoel Teroele in the Fryske Marren (Netherlands).
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kaffeegasse in Mitterretzbach/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. And in german: Es ist üblich, nicht nur zu nominieren, sondern auch zu bewerten. Bewerte also bitte in etwa so viele Bilder wie du nominierst. Das ist auch im Sinne der Fairness so. Danke. --XRay 05:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Konventsgebäude, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve “Zwillbrocker Venn” (BOR-008), Vreden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe too much noise suppression on the horizon, but good for me.--Famberhorst 05:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northeastern view of the chapel Mary of Help (Luschen chapel) in Sankt Peter, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western view of the chapel Mary of Help (Luschen chapel) in Sankt Peter, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coreopsis tinctoria blossom --PumpkinSky 23:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common grass yellow (Eurema hecabe solifera), Ghana --Charlesjsharp 21:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry but this one is too unsharp. --Ermell 07:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western pierid blue (Larinopoda eurema), Ghana --Charlesjsharp 21:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trou de Bozouls, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 20:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 07:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pumping water Tijnjepolder the Horsewei Boornzwaag. Information board.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 16:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Pumping water Tijnjepolder the Horsewei Boornzwaag. Information board.
-
- Nomination Rear view of monument to General San Martin, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Lots of dust spots and there are
chromatic aberration as well. Fixable, but needs quite a bit of work.--Peulle 06:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Done --Ezarate 21:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done Not even close. Look at the blue background; there are multiple issues.--Peulle 19:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Done Ezarate 22:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose No, the work around the horse's ears is sloppy and there are still dusts spots. And sorry, but that's enough chances to fix it; only a completely fixed version can change my vote. --Peulle 21:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Town hall of Muret-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 23:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Town hall of Muret-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 23:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Yeghvard Church, front doors, Armenia --Steven C. Price 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wine vessels at Zvartnots Cathedral, Armenia --Steven C. Price 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Combine harvester from the left side Shev123 21:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Noise and spots need cleaning.--Peulle 16:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
I have tried to do something (seems better but I am not a specialist). --Shev123 21:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Comment Still a bit more denoising needed, IMO. Look at the sky, it's grainy.--Peulle 19:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I have tried new thngs and it seems better now. --Shev123 17:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Oppose I appreciate the effort but now it looks overprocessed. I shall decline it as it seems it may not be possible to improve. Feel free to take it to CR if you disagree.--Peulle 14:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kanyam is a tourist destination in Ilam District of Nepal. --Bijay chaurasia 18:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Imo acceptable for QI --DXR 08:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Duckweed on the river. By User:Yurii-mr --ViraMotorko (WMUA) 18:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Photo ok but categories needs to be much better, also an English description would be welcome. --W.carter 17:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Comment for me extremely unsharp in the corners--Zoppo59 13:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Per unsharpness mentioned above --DXR 08:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Duckweed on the river. By User:Yurii-mr --ViraMotorko (WMUA) 18:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:IAF-F-15I-Raam--Independence-Day-2017-Tel-Nof-IZE-172.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Israeli Air Force F-15I Ra'am --MathKnight 18:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose
Good quality.--Ermell 20:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree, there is a lot of
chromatic aberration in the photo that should be removed and the black border is not desireble for a normal QI , please remove it. --W.carter 22:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Per W.carter. --Basotxerri 07:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Also per W.carter.--Peulle 15:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
File:2016-11-01_Borner_See,_Schwan_(03)_(freddy2001).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ein Schwan am Borner See --Freddy2001 20:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Too much colour noise and CAs, please discuss --Llez 21:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose
chromatic aberration --The Photographer 01:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Per Llez. --Peulle 14:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Common_eland_2016_12_31_3702a.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Common eland (Taurotragus oryx) on basalt grassland near Giants Castle camp, uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park, KwaZulu-Natal. --Alandmanson 12:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality --Llez 16:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose dear Alandmanson it does not match the size creteria which has to be above 2 megapixel --IssamBarhoumi 15:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- I disagree 2320×1471px equals 3.41MP --Alandmanson 20:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Question Your camera offers a higher resolution. Is it a crop or downsampeled? --Milseburg 04:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- slight crop and reduced by 50% --Alandmanson 12:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Question Is there any reason for reducing the image size? --Basotxerri 17:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- better IQ, smaller file. --Alandmanson 17:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Info I´m not a fan of this guidline. It is contoversial and in my eyes it can kicked out. But actually applies: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down in order to appear of better quality). Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file". I suggest uploading the original resolution. --Milseburg 09:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- better IQ, smaller file. --Alandmanson 17:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- slight crop and reduced by 50% --Alandmanson 12:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
the guideline do not permit it right now in the future if the guideline is changed we can QIfy it : we have to rethink the question of sharpness and the condition of taking the shot especially when the subject is far or the light is not Good also I suggest that there is a vote here as In FP more opinion in one picture make the result better for the QI Category --IssamBarhoumi 11:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Don´t vote twice. I canceled your second vote --Milseburg 15:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Oppose
Oppose Downsampled and only 100mm so I don't see any other reason to downsample except but to make it appear of better quality.--Peulle 15:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Question I am confused; is this about the quality of the image I uploaded, or is it about how I got there? If my lens is not good enough to create a quality image at 10MP, but the quality is good at 2.5MP, surely that is as good as the same image by a 3 MP camera using the whole frame - as long as it looks as good?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alandmanson (talk • contribs)
- It's about the quality of the image. And the answer to your last question is "no". Standards improve over time with the quality of the equipment: if you have an excellent camera the expectations rise. The point here is that it seems you were unable to shoot a QI at full resolution, and compressed it to make it look better. That's "cheating" and it's what the guideline above is made to prevent. Otherwise we'd all just reduce the size of our images to get them past the QIC rather than shooting QIs in the first place. I hope that explains it.--Peulle 06:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Himantopus_himantopus,_Sète_cf09.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Himantopus himantopus (Black-winged stilt) near a pond. --Christian Ferrer 19:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --A.Savin 09:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose There are many water droplets on the lens I think. Charlesjsharp 11:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Question I see that, too. Is it fixable in post-processing? -- Ikan Kekek 04:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay I had connection problems, it is the water lifted by the legs of the bird moves, as evidence this photo taken a few second later, I have at no time wiped the lens nor cloned out any water droplets. At the opposite, this is more an evidence of the good quality, at least for the details. Christian Ferrer 15:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose For me, the bird facing away from the camera, along with the twig in front of the legs, detract from image quality --Alandmanson 13:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Per others. --Palauenc05 09:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment The composition is acceptable IMHO and the droplets not a problem. But IMHO, it is a bit underexposed and slightly noisy. --C messier 13:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Playa Risco del Paso - Fuerteventura - 01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Playa Risco del Paso, Fuertevetura --Llez 16:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Review
Support No, no, ..., yes, yes! :-) --XRay 17:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose no no! Rule of thirds! yes yes! Beautiful on eyes and mind.... --RaboKarbakian 15:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Support Yes, yes, the rule of third is a suggestion/guide not a law. --W.carter 18:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- So, if not composition, what makes this a QI? -- RaboKarbakian 18:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- The quality of a composition isn't based on some precooked ratio. -- Ikan Kekek 20:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- This exemplary photographer is no more? --RaboKarbakian 01:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Who is that? Someone real or some theoretical ideal? I react to what I see. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Llez, always a great photographer on QIC. --RaboKarbakian 21:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that he's a great photographer, but he's very much alive, thank goodness, and you are the one opposing this photograph, not I, so I truly don't understand what you're saying, other than that this photograph disappoints you. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Master of the suggestions is dying in QI right now. I don't like to see the masters lose it at the 'suggestions' and kill QI a little at the same while. --RaboKarbakian 18:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that he's a great photographer, but he's very much alive, thank goodness, and you are the one opposing this photograph, not I, so I truly don't understand what you're saying, other than that this photograph disappoints you. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Llez, always a great photographer on QIC. --RaboKarbakian 21:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Who is that? Someone real or some theoretical ideal? I react to what I see. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- This exemplary photographer is no more? --RaboKarbakian 01:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The quality of a composition isn't based on some precooked ratio. -- Ikan Kekek 20:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- So, if not composition, what makes this a QI? -- RaboKarbakian 18:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose In this case the foreground is the main part of the photo and it is for me not detailed enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose I don't see a lot of sharpness or detail here ...--Peulle 18:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Support - This photo is not about great sharpness or detail; it's a work of art that in my eyes succeeds in its own terms. -- Ikan Kekek 00:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment What a controversary picture. It's not sharp in front but in the middle, on the horizon it get unsharp again by atmospherical reasons. I think I'm more on the side of the supporters but it's difficult to argue. I believe it's the artistic value for me although this shouldn't be a deciding QI criteria. @Llez: The horizon is slightly tilted, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 10:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Done --Llez 15:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Support. Thank you! --Basotxerri 16:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Additional
Info: Exactly here Moses and the Israelites crossed the Red Sea, at least in the film Exodus: Gods and Kings this scenes were filmed at this place (see also the poster in the linked Wikipedia article) --Llez 16:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Additional
Support - per Ikan. Interesting composition. Horizon is very slightly tilted, but it´s ok for QI--Milseburg 11:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Weak oppose Not QI for me--Billy69150 13:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC).
Support --Livioandronico2013 19:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose with Michielverbeek --Zoppo59 15:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, the subject is blurry IMO. Without detail. --Lmbuga 23:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Milseburg 15:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)