Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 28 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hotel_Alfonso_XIII,_Sevilla,_España,_2015-12-06,_DD_80.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Alfonso 13th hotel, Seville, Spain --Poco a poco 08:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Cool composition, but a bit noisy. Some of the lanterns are leaning in, can it be fixed? --Peulle 09:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment What are you asking me to fix? the noise (I could have a look, would you add a note?) or the perspective (I wouldn't, it's as it's on purpose)? Poco a poco 10:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment See notes; the lanterns look bent. Not sure if it's a big problem. --Peulle 12:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it's fine. CR. --Tsungam 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support its ok and QI. --Ralf Roletschek 16:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine to me --Domdomegg 22:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:LV-0233_steam_locomotive_at_the_station_Taganrog-II_IMG_9858_2175.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination LV-0233 steam locomotive at the station "Taganrog-II" --Alexxx1979 03:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 04:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, I disagree; the sharpness is fine, but large portions of the locomotive (the main subject) has been cropped out, and there is no reason to do so. The camera is able to take pictures a lot larger than this. Let's discuss further in CR. --Peulle 10:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me --A.Savin 13:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Obviously intended as a close-up. Nothing to complain and 7 MPix is a generous contribution for a cropped version. --Cccefalon 09:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine for me, what Cccefalon said --Domdomegg 22:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Delhi: Red Fort walls at Delhi Gate --A.Savin 14:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment It does look too redish to me, I know the spot and it looks oversaturated to me. There is also some sharpening halos Poco a poco 14:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Yes, the walls are red because it is the "Red" Fort, plus the colours at evening time are usually more staurated. In the postprocess, I already significantly reduced the saturation and also removed haloes, so from my point it should be OK. --A.Savin 15:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
      • @Poco a poco: As you didn't reply, I've put it to the CR. --A.Savin 21:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK to me. --Peulle 08:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --SKas 18:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Domdomegg 22:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)