Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 02 2013

• 
  • Nomination Lighthouse at mouth of Canal du Midi into Étang de Thau --P e z i 23:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Písečná (Sandhübel), Czech Republic - church --Pudelek 22:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dwellings of estate workers of Ladang Sapong, Sabah --Cccefalon 22:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --P e z i 23:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dwellings of estate workers of Ladang Sapong near Tenom, Sabah --Cccefalon 22:32, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --P e z i 23:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church in La Val --Moroder 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good quality --P e z i 00:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church in La Val --Moroder 22:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Earth road to Upper Antelope Canyon --Tuxyso 21:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Off-road vehicles parking in front of the entry of Upper Antelope Canyon --Tuxyso 21:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:120, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clariant Innovation Center, Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 20:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good quality! QI for me. --Cccefalon 20:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sandakan, Sabah: Chartered Company Memorial --Cccefalon 19:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capri-Town, Capri island, Campania, Italy. --NorbertNagel 19:35, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks good, composition is also appealing. --Tuxyso 21:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral Limburg, Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 19:35, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grand Palace, Bangkok, Thailand --Poco a poco 18:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome of Samadhi Mandir of Srila Prabhupada at ISKCON, Mayapur. --JDP90 18:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lynmouth, Devon, England --XRay 18:13, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 21:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lutheran Chapel in Wittdün on the frisian island of Amrum, bell tower --Dirtsc 16:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination During the New Kingdom, ushabti figures were often placed in a painted wooden box shaped like a shrine. Only the sides of this box are preserved, and it may have held a number of ushabti figures or a set of canopic jars. The deities associated with death and the afterlife are represented on the box's panels. There is the figure of a jackal on top of a shrine, which represents the embalming god Anubis. Isis and Nephthys flank the large symbol of Osiris and the four sons of Horus. All of the inscriptions are related to the god Osiris. --SarahStierch 16:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not made by a wikipedian--Jebulon 17:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The permission to use this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. It is available as ticket #2012021710000834 for users with an OTRS account. If you wish to reuse this work elsewhere, please read the instructions at COM:REUSE. If you are a Commons user and wish to confirm the permission, please leave a note at the OTRS noticeboard. --SarahStierch 16:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not made by a wikipedian--Jebulon 17:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The wings of this charming cosmetic container pivot outward, revealing a storage compartment. The eyes were once inlaid. The pintail duck is one of Egypt's most common species of waterfowl and was a popular decorative motif. --SarahStierch 16:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not made by a wikipedian--Jebulon 17:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The permission to use this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. It is available as ticket #2012021710000834 for users with an OTRS account. If you wish to reuse this work elsewhere, please read the instructions at COM:REUSE. If you are a Commons user and wish to confirm the permission, please leave a note at the OTRS noticeboard. --SarahStierch 16:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not made by a wikipedian--Jebulon 17:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Twelve oarsmen, a helmsman, and a pilot, or look-out, ferry their passenger, the tomb-owner. Such models were associated with religious beliefs, as they symbolized the journey of the deceased to Abydos, the traditional burial place of Osiris, lord of the afterworld. The tomb-owner is clothed with a shroud and is shown with a blue beard. This boat was probably placed in the tomb to assist the deceased in navigating the Nile of the underworld. Typically, models of passenger ships found in Middle Kingdom tombs occur in pairs. One to travel south, equipped with a sail, as the wind in Egypt blows constantly from north to south, and the other (as this model shows) propelled by rowers aided by the Nile's current, to travel north. --SarahStierch 16:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Not made by a wikipedian--Jebulon 17:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The woman in this fragmentary painting from a tomb wall has a wig of long, full hair, held in place by a flowered headband and topped with an ointment cone, a perfumed substance placed on wigs that gave off a fragrant aroma as it melted. A lotus blossom adorns the front of the headband. She holds a rattle called a sistrum, which women often played during temple ceremonies. What remains of the inscription suggests that she may have served with the temple staff of the god Amen. --SarahStierch 16:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not made by a wikipedian--Jebulon 17:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Denkmalgeschütztes Gebäude in Bergkamen, Kreis Unna, Nordrhein-Westfalen. --Smial 16:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion very tight crop on top but still QI IMO --P e z i 00:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Henry Girls --SarahStierch 15:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not a commoner's photo --Smial 16:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The visible pinball machine. In the collection of the Pacific Pinball Museum. --SarahStierch 15:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Not a commoner's photo --Smial 16:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Blanzay (12th and 15th centuries) with a romanesque bell tower and a gothic apse. Blanzay, Vienne, France. --JLPC 15:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arrival from SSW at Auriac-de-Bourzac, Dordogne, France. --JLPC 15:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JDP90 18:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SW view of the church of Linazay, Vienne, France. --JLPC 15:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. --NorbertNagel 19:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canal locks in Kleinmachnow, Brandenburg, Germany --A.Savin 14:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 14:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned railway bridge over Teltowkanal, Brandenburg, Germany --A.Savin 14:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Nice flag ;-) --Smial 14:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavilion in Schlosspark Glienicke, Berlin, Germany --A.Savin 14:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, though somewhat overexposed (sunny side of the walls). --Smial 14:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saviour Church at Sacrow, Potsdam, Germany --A.Savin 14:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 15:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slepcev Storch. --Julian Herzog 14:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DFS Habicht E. --Julian Herzog 14:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --P e z i 23:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Donau Air Service Antonov An-2 (built in 1957). --Julian Herzog 14:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good --A.Savin 14:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination roadside stall in Åbo near Aarhus, Denmark --Villy Fink Isaksen 13:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overexposed sky, however you could crop it away --A.Savin 14:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    Cropped --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
     Support good now --A.Savin 22:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La grande parade des Tonnerres de Brest 2012 dans la rade de Brest en direction de Douarnenez. --Thesupermat 10:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose unsharp, noisy --A.Savin 14:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Patti Smith en concet lors de la fête de l'Humanité 2012. --Thesupermat 10:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industries in Putrajaya, Malaysia (re-nomination after applicating another untilt operation) --Cccefalon 10:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 14:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two columns of the Basilica Aemilia, Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Below the Palatine Hill, some brick arches. Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, though perhaps somewhat overexposed. --Smial 10:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forum Romanum, partial view. In background, the remains of the Basilica of Constantine and Maxentius. Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church Santa Francesca Romana, Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 15:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Parthian prisoner by a Roman, relief, Arch of Septimius Severus, detail. Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 09:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good. --A.Savin 14:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Une BMW - S1000 RR lors du mondial du deux roues de Paris 2011. --Thesupermat 08:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of Bismarck ("Bismarck Turm") in Mülheim an der Ruhr --Tuxyso 08:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise, sharpness, perspective, somewhat too high colour saturation. A tripod could help. --Smial 10:32, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    I will work on it later and re-nominate. Sharpness is imho OK with regard to the resolution. --Tuxyso 10:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    Hu? This is only 6 MPix from a camera with 16 MPix if EXIF are not manipulated. -- Smial 14:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abai Bay at Ambong, Sabah --Cccefalon 08:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion I cannot really understand why a photo from a full frame (!!) camera is downscaled below 3MP. --Tuxyso 08:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment The size of the upload should not be the criteria for the QI assessment, should it? If you like the photo and you want to have a personal copy with higher resolution, feel free to ask me, I will send it to you. --Cccefalon 09:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    You are completely right and it is nothing wrong with your nomination but this contradicts my personal idea of real free content. Maybe someone else promotes this (good) photo. --Tuxyso 09:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
     Support After clarification of some misunderstandings. --Tuxyso 10:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jetty at Ambong, Sabah --Cccefalon 08:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion I cannot really understand why a photo from a full frame (!!) camera is downscaled below 3MP. --Tuxyso 08:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment The request for nomination is size > 2 MB. If there is a new request that nominations require full size upload, I will do that. --Cccefalon 09:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    There is no such requirement. Nonetheless artifically downscaling is a bit pity and I would like to encourage you to provide full size version of your good photos. --Tuxyso 09:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
     Support After clarification of some misunderstandings. --Tuxyso 10:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Part of Trajan's Forum, with columns of the ancient basilica Ulpia in Rome. --Cayambe 07:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raoul Fonquerne water-based recreation. Sète, France. --Christian Ferrer 06:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Light is not at its best, but OK for QI. Have you tried a slightly warmer WB? --Tuxyso 09:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)  Done new version, thanks --Christian Ferrer 12:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient farmhouse of the 16th century in the nature reserve of the Montnegre-Cataluña-España --Alberto-g-rovi 06:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Modernist viewing-point of house Bordoi-Llinars del Valles-Cataluña-España --Alberto-g-rovi 06:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 15:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the museum Prince of Felipe the city of the arts and the sciences of Valencia - Spain --Alberto-g-rovi 06:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 13:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Torra di Roccapina --Lewis Hulbert 01:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Somewhat soft at the top of the tower, and in the corners, but acceptable, not really disturbing. --Smial 10:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Třebovice (Triebitz), Czech Republic - church --Pudelek 23:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Česká Třebová (Böhmisch Trübau), Czech Republic - old town hall. Coat of arms of family Bohdanecký --Pudelek 23:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Litomyšl (Leitomischl), Czech Republic - Smetanovo náměstí --Pudelek 23:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. --JLPC 14:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountains in Ordino. Andorra-224 --Lmbuga 22:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 14:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountains in Ordino. Andorra-225 --Lmbuga 22:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountains in Ordino. Andorra-226 --Lmbuga 22:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paide market building. Kruusamägi 22:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Smial 15:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hotel Paris with triumphal arch in Las Vegas --Tuxyso 21:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1931 Chevrolet Independence Phaeton -- Qflieger 18:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination City Canal, London. Mattbuck 08:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Low corner sharpness, CA, somewhat underexposed. Composition: not clear what's the subject. --Smial 10:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Signpost at the Coast Path near Land's End, Cornwall, England --XRay 07:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
    There is some chromatic noise Poco a poco 20:46, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
     Done Noise removed/reduced ... hopefully.--XRay 17:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coast at the South West Coast Path near Land's End, Cornwall, England --XRay 07:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Savoureuse river, in Lepuix, France. --ComputerHotline 18:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish cemetery in Mielec, the grave of PZL Mielec workers killed during German air raid in 2.09.1939 --Kroton 17:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion The shadow is a bit disturbing, but QI to me. . --Cayambe 07:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elfbergen Gaasterland. gnome Route.--
    Famberhorst 16:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 17:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination This media shows the protected monument with the number 98017 in Austria.
    Allegorical statue depicting the governmental executive, part of the Pallas Athene fountain in front of the Austrian parliament building in Vienna --Diana Ringo 12:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion It needs a proper description. Some little overexposed parts of the statue. Nice composition, I don't think perspective correction would do any good here. If you rework it, put this nomination back to blue and leave a comment. --Kadellar 17:44, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
     Done Decreased the highlights and added descriptions --Diana Ringo 23:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
    Thanks for reworking. --Kadellar 09:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Armoury, Gdansk, Poland --Poco a poco 10:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 07:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malbork Castle, Poland --Poco a poco 10:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Noise and several dust spots --A.Savin 14:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
     Done Poco a poco 23:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
     Support OK now --A.Savin 13:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination California Gull. --King of Hearts 09:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination View from church tower in Wittstock/Dosse, Brandenburg, Germany --A.Savin 08:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like it, but could you correct the perspective please? It's leaning out a bit. Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
     Done --A.Savin 23:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
    Still leaning out on the left, though right side is now correct. Mattbuck 19:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
     Done but just a few, as I don't think there is significant distortion --A.Savin 11:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    Well, if you're going to correct the perspective you should get it perfect if possible. Mattbuck 19:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Andrews Road station. Mattbuck 07:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn The right part is a bit blurred --Christian Ferrer 06:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    Mattbuck 19:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship. Mattbuck 07:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Nice view --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jervaulx Abbey. Mattbuck 07:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Several dust spots --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
    Tii blurry. Mattbuck 19:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 321s at New Southgate. Mattbuck 07:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Obihiro Airport --663highland 15:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Review The sky is a bit dark and noisy and a slight perspective correction is required. Can be fixed, I guess. --NorbertNagel 18:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Gran_Palacio,_Bangkok,_Tailandia,_2013-08-22,_DD_50.jpg

• Nomination Gradn Palace, Bangkok, Thailand --Poco a poco 18:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion The off-centreness is offputting. It might be fixable by distortion. --Mattbuck 23:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
   Fixed Poco a poco 22:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  Please, let me move it to CR, otherwise it will vanish soon Poco a poco 20:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC) --Poco a poco 20:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  Apologies, I haven't been checking here in detail the past few days. Your pictures of that place really are a bit of a mindfuck you know. Anyway, much better, no need to continue discussion when there's only one person who's commented. Mattbuck 08:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Aysgarth Falls MMB 32.jpg

• Nomination Aysgarth Falls. Mattbuck 07:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline No motive cognizable - could also be a very abstract image. Long exposure shots do imho only work if you have a mix of still and moving objects. In the case here everything is moving. --Tuxyso 15:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  I have seen other images like this promoted, I'd ask for other comments. Mattbuck 18:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  *  Oppose As for Tuxyso, no fixpoint. -- Smial 22:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Makowice,_Opolskie_Voivodeship_(Poland,_2013-10-29).jpg

• Nomination Panorama of Makowice (Opolskie, Poland) --(GRAD) 18:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion  Oppose noisy on clouds, unbalanced composition --A.Savin 18:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support Noise reduced, some sharpness added. --Iifar 08:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support --Christian Ferrer 18:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Ok -- Smial 13:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Klodzko - Twierdza, przejscie.jpg

• Nomination Klodzko Fortress (Poland, Lower Silesia) - interior of the fortress. --Jar.ciurus 15:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Sorry, overexposed areas and not good detail IMO--Lmbuga 22:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC) --I wanted to keep some overexposed areas (like outdoor). I could make HDR, but I didn't want. Details? Image is quite sharp, for example look at the lamp on the upper left... --Jar.ciurus 07:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  No problem, other users can opine ("discuss"). You know my opinion. You have very good images, but this picture IMO..., sorry --Lmbuga 12:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose Overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:13, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:57, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Clovelly (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1359.jpg

• Nomination Clovelly, Devon, England --XRay 08:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline Overexposed. --Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  I've reduced the light and the bright areas, so I think it's OK.--XRay 07:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  Better, but the water and trees are unsharp, so still  Oppose I'm afraid. Mattbuck 19:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:55, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dalston Junction railway station MMB 06 378138 378150.jpg

• Nomination 378s at Dalston Junction. Mattbuck 06:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
• Withdrawn  Comment Good image! But there is a small dust spot in the centre of the sky.--XRay 13:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  Hm, how odd. Given f4.5 I doubt it's a dust spot (too small), but have removed it. Mattbuck 21:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  It's OK. Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose The lack of sharpness cannot be good for a QI-picture IMO. --Hockei 17:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support --Christian Ferrer 18:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

 Oppose Per Hockei--Jebulon 10:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

You're right. Mattbuck 18:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Blick von Amöneburg Richtung Norden (1).jpg

• Nomination View from Amöneburg --Hydro 21:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline in focus IMO. Unnatural colors (especially blue) IMO. Others can opine--Lmbuga 23:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed, somewhat oversaturated, clipping in blue channel. -- Smial 13:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Audi R8 C, Bj. 1999 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG

• Nomination Audi R8 C LMP from 1999 at museum mobile -- Spurzem 19:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose - Nice, but not sharp. --Mattbuck 23:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

   Comment What happens here is persecution for me! I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 10:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

  I have better things to do than persecute you. As lots of people here will tell you, I'm quite a harsh judge, but I dish it out evenly to any images I review. Mattbuck 21:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not sharp enough IMO beacause dof (f/7,1). Chromatic noise and noise, sorry--Lmbuga 13:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
• OK! But please look to many other QIs of cars and compare. -- Spurzem 22:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

  We're not reviewing those other ones, though I think you can ask for old QIs to be re-reviewed, though AFAIK no one's ever done it except by accident. Mattbuck 19:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Lac Lérié, La Grave, Frankrijk (2400 m.) 05.JPG

• Nomination Lac Lérié, La Grave, Frankrijk (2400 m.) Mirror La Meije.--
  Famberhorst 15:44, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline Unsharp. --Mattbuck 23:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support Sharp enough for QI in my opinion. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC
•  Weak oppose Too much noise reduction: Unsharp IMO, but nice image--Lmbuga 13:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:BMW_R80GS_GENUINE_7.JPG

• Nomination Motorcycle BMW R80G/S 1981 on the Volcano "Piton de la Fournaise" Réunion Island / France --Gastair 17:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline Nice composition but clipped whites and slight CA. Kadellar 17:48, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support May be that there are slight lacks but for me the photo is QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 23:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose big areas of sky overexposed --P e z i 13:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per opposers.--Jebulon 01:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB 87 Castle Combe Classic Series.jpg

• Nomination Castle Combe circuit. Mattbuck 07:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline  Support ok --A.Savin 11:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
   Comment  Oppose Sharp enough, not noisy, no CA? I am astonished. -- Spurzem 14:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose As Spurzem --Hockei 08:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Friedrichshafen-2861_1.jpg

• Nomination Catamaran Constanze, a ferry heading for Konstanz, leaving the port of Friedrichshafen, county Bodenseekreis, Deutschland --DKrieger 23:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 04:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
   Comment The top of the catamaran seems to be over-exposed. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support Looks ok to me. Julian Herzog 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Zwartendijksterschans.jpg

• Nomination File:Zwartendijksterschans --1Veertje 13:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion {{o}} No description of the file. It needs English description--[[User:Lmbuga|Lmbuga]] 15:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC) description added
  
•  Support Looks good for me. @Lmbuga: Why have you declined only because amissing description? In this case I had just left a comment because it is easily fixable. --Tuxyso 07:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support --Christian Ferrer 15:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
   Support -- Spurzem 20:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent. Mathieudu68 22:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I think the absence of data is serious because it makes very difficult the categorization of the quality images that are in Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted--Lmbuga 18:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 19:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Prignitz 07-13 img04 Schloss Wolfshagen.jpg

• Nomination Bridge at Wolfshagen Castle, Brandenburg, Germany --A.Savin 07:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Please remove CA from the trees, perspective over-corrected.--ArildV 08:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --JLPC 12:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

*{{o}} CAs are improvables--Lmbuga 16:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

• •  Done CA corrected, perspective --A.Savin 08:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support If I will I see low CA in the trees. But this is negligible. We should not exaggerate with criticism. -- Spurzem 20:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me now--Lmbuga 18:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --A.Savin 08:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Western bluebird in Sonoma - California - Sarah Stierch - B.jpg

• Nomination Sialia mexicana (Western bluebird) in Sonoma, California --SarahStierch 18:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support --XRay 05:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, strong CAs IMO (see notes)--Lmbuga 12:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose per Lmbuga --Christian Ferrer 17:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 19:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:2013.07.25.1-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Kleiner Feuerfalter.jpg

• Nomination Kleiner Feuerfalter - Lycaena phlaeas --Hockei 18:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Backlighting and in shadow (bad perspective). Bad close-up focus. Insufficient detail IMO; but I'm not sure: "Discuss" because it's not a bad picture--Lmbuga 17:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much blurred area, poor lighting --Archaeodontosaurus 05:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 19:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Gran_Palacio,_Bangkok,_Tailandia,_2013-08-22,_DD_61.jpg

• Nomination Gradn Palace, Bangkok, Thailand --Poco a poco 16:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Imo pretty tilted, + strange spot to the right of the middle tower --A.Savin 17:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support in any case, good quality IMO. Perhaps the image needs a bit less of perspective correction, but not tilted IMO. If tilted or distorted, not disturbing IMO. Good quality--Lmbuga 17:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't see the spot, I only see a bird in the distance, sorry--Lmbuga 17:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
• I made some slight corrections of tilt / perspective (and the spot), please not that the central tower is not straight Poco a poco 20:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I find the tilt on the windows in the left half problematic, if this is a wide-angle distortion (which I suppose) it is not easy to fix it I'm afraid. The new version still has this distortion. --A.Savin 08:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --A.Savin 08:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Palma nana a Segesta.JPG

• Nomination Chamaerops humilis--OppidumNissenae 10:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose CA and overexposure on right side Poco a poco 22:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not to me --Poco a poco 22:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC
•  Oppose Same opinion --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC))

 Comment I have a new pic improved (photo-retouched), I can post it?--OppidumNissenae 15:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 19:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Свод купола Казанского собора.jpg

• Nomination coving of the dome of the Kazan Cathedral in St. Petersburg--User:Max A. Khlopov 14:28, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support --Alberto-g-rovi 17:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose very soft and noisy, chromatic aberrations and overexposure on windows --A.Savin 07:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy. Mathieudu68 22:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition could be adjusted more symmetrical, it would be more harmonic and balanced then. --Cccefalon 10:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 19:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:2013.07.01-15-Wustrow-Neu Drosedow-Erdbeerspinne-Maennchen.jpg

• Nomination Erdbeerspinne - Araneus alsine, Männchen (male) --Hockei 16:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose As per your other photos, significant posterisation. --Mattbuck 19:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
   Comment I can't see what you say. The light does not shine evenly through the animal. The spider was fleeing in the grass and in motion very fast. --Hockei 20:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I don't understand what Mattbuck will say. For me the photo is QI. -- Spurzem 07:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Mattbuck--Lmbuga 00:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 19:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:2013.07.01-14-Wustrow-Neu Drosedow-Erdbeerspinne-Maennchen.jpg

• Nomination Erdbeerspinne - Araneus alsine, Männchen (male) --Hockei 16:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose As per your other photos, significant posterisation. --Mattbuck 19:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

 Comment I can't see what you say. The light does not shine evenly through the animal. The spider was fleeing in the grass and in motion very fast. --Hockei 20:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support -- Spurzem 07:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Mattbuck. Not QI for me: poor detail--Lmbuga 00:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 18:55, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:2013.07.01-06-Wustrow-Neu Drosedow-Rotbraunes Wiesenvoegelchen-Weibchen.jpg

• Nomination Rotbraunes Wiesenvögelchen - Coenonympha glycerion --Hockei 17:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose Posterisation. --Mattbuck 19:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
   Info New version. Please take a look. --Hockei 20:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Background too noisy. As Mattbuck. The detail is not good IMO. Too tight IMO--Lmbuga 00:38, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 18:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Templo_Mahathat,_Ayutthaya,_Tailandia,_2013-08-23,_DD_05.jpg

• Nomination Mahathat Temple, Ayutthaya, Thailand --Poco a poco 14:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --JLPC 15:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Leafs with double borders, (strongly removed CA?) --Iifar 19:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I think that you are raising the bar a bit too much, but anyhow, do you think the uploaded version is good enough? Poco a poco 19:32, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 01:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe 17:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 17:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Nuevo_Palacio_Schleissheim,_Oberschleissheim,_Alemania,_2013-08-31,_DD_05.jpg

• Nomination Schleissheimer Channel, New Schleissheim Palace gardens, Oberschleissheim, Germany --Poco a poco 18:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion * Comment Not really sharp, isn't it? Perspective correction necessary. Sorry. --XRay 15:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
  I introduced some improvements, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 06:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
   Comment the bulding is tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Corrected Poco a poco 21:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Question To me the picture is a bit dark, and the sky has minor areas overexposed: Was the picture taken at 23:17h (see metadata)?--Lmbuga 22:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC). I can't vote because I do not understand the light that the photo could be taken--Lmbuga 23:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment
  Español: El texto de la propuesta no me parece el más apropiado: El edificio es demasiada poca cosa en la foto (claro que yo soy capaz de imaginar otro texto más a mi gusto y promover la foto)
  = The text of the proposal does not seem the most appropriate: The building is too little in the picture (of course I am able to imagine another text more to my liking and promote the photo.--Lmbuga 23:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support - OK for me. Mattbuck 19:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment The picture was taken at 18:17. I forgot to adjust the clock after a trip to Asia. I have also updated the description of the page with the Schleißheimer channel as main subject. Poco a poco 21:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support - OK for me--Lmbuga 23:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 21:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:OT Berlin 09-13 Werner Gatzer.jpg

• Nomination Werner Gatzer, a politician of Germany --A.Savin 11:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Overprocessed --Smial 14:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
  • see nothing critical --A.Savin 17:07, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
    • Halo on shoulders, unrealistic blur / DOF at the collar of the shirt. Possibly due to massive noise reduction of dark areas. -- Smial 12:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
      • It is just a portrait and the face should be ok, whereas everything else is negligible. Also, wrong, there was no massive NR; just usual lightroom process. --A.Savin 12:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
        • It is not a good idea to apply double standards in QIC reviews. This leads to nitpicking and is counterproductive. -- Smial 10:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
          • Right --A.Savin 10:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
            • Very nice you mentioned this case yourself. Have a look on sharpness, lighting and background of the image of Mr. Gatzer ;-) Just for the records: With Mr. Gatzers portrait I did NOT critisize the funny background or the somewhat weak sharpness or the flat and boring lighting, because I know how difficult it can be, to catch such shots in real life situations and I accept such minor flaws. I critisize the ugly processing artifacts. -- Smial 11:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Cannot figure out any problems here. Compared to lot of other portrayal shots which are often noisy, unsharp and have minimum 2MP res this one has a quite high quality. --Tuxyso 08:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose - the shirt and jacket do look odd, and the white balance is far from optimal. Mattbuck 19:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 21:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)