Commons:Valued image candidates/Nuchal translucency Dr. Wolfgang Moroder.jpg

Nuchal translucency Dr. Wolfgang Moroder.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2012-01-10 11:08 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Nuchal translucency
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Image of a correct sagittal scan of the fetal nuchal translucency as certified by the Fetal Medicine Foundation. -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment Subject very interresting and useful. It would be useful to a SET with the pathological image (File: Nuchal translucency élevée.png) or else to limit the scope of the image presented to "normal", that the other can be promoted as "abnormal".--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment The nuchal translucency diameter is a continuous variable which correlates like maternal age with the risk of aneuploidy. Therefor it has to be considered as a single entity for the recalculation on the risk for Down S. A pathologic NT or nuchal edema or cystic hygroma is something else. But it would not be a problem for me to post a set of two images, one with a enlarged NT if that is expected.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC) I support in anticipation the SET :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment I think this is a valued and useful image. I agree with Archaeodontosaurus that a set (normal v. pathological) would even more valuable. Directions for a set nomination are at Commons:Valued_image_candidates#Adding_a_new_nomination_.28set.29. I will support either way. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment transferred to a set as you can see here--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)