Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This talk page is automatically archived by ArchiveBot. Any sections older than 60 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.


File:Hörnum Odde 2017.jpg was promoted but got no tag. What´s wrong or to do? --Milseburg (talk) 19:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Good question, I say almost a month later. How do we add the tag? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I tagged it by hand. -- DeFacto (talk). 11:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I see how you did that. I think it would be good not to archive this discussion, in case this comes up again, so people know where to look to see how to add the tag. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

VICbot problem[edit]

Closed VI nominations are not currently being processed by VICbot, so I have reported the problem. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! :) -- DeFacto (talk). 18:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Problem with Papaver oriëntale. Locatie, Tuinen Mien Ruys 02.jpg / Papaver somniferum 01.JPG[edit]

@Jcb: @Famberhorst: We have an image that seems to be promoted for this scope Papaver somniferum 01.JPG. It is indeed Papaver orientale, the scope for which it seems promoted is wrong. It should be downgraded. What can we propose? Would it be equitable to pass a MVR? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Misidentified Promoted Image[edit]

I am also a similar problem Charles has with this current MVR. I found out some time ago one of my photos may be misidentified, specifically this one File:Daniel Carter Beard Bridge Crossing.jpg. I had a chance to look into it the other week, agreed and had it renamed. Problem is it was promoted with a VI scope that is wrong now. I didn't know how to fix it properly so I'm in the same predicament Charles is in. How does one fix this manually? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)