Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

43,603 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			39,270 (90.1%)
Undecided			2,066 (4.7%)
Declined			2,267 (5.2%)

New valued image nominations

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-06-12 12:13 (UTC) Scope: Cicindela campestris (Green tiger beetle) dorsal  Comment This image Cicindela campestris Bytom.jpg looks better for colors and is used more... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Andrei (talk) on 2021-06-12 19:20 (UTC) Scope: Maciej Hołub  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Lorax (talk) on 2021-06-12 01:10 (UTC) Scope: Broken open Fortune Cookie Reason: Used in the fortune cookie article for many languages wikipedias and wiktionaries, used as the category picture in commons, shows how the fortune in the fortune cookie is situated inside the cookie as well as the shape and texture of a fortune cookie. -- Lorax (talk)  Best in Scope on the basis argued above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-14 11:44 (UTC) Scope: Sealand Road, Chester - No. 5 Used in: See global usage  Comment Useful, but I think you should include the name of the town in the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment So it turns out that there's one in Manchester, but otherwise unique. Hmmm. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)  Question Do you have an argument to share? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, No idea what that means. I've changed the scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Nevermind.  Support, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-15 05:10 (UTC) Scope: Strobilotoma typhaecornis Lateral view  Comment I think you might say this is too blurred to be valuable! Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)  Question Would you say that, considering it being used as a thumbnail in an article? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Charles is right the outer bangs are fuzzy, but he was alive, and he didn't like to pose. I have never seen this species since. The discriminator of the species is clearly visible: typhaecornis/ Horned distaff --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-15 05:12 (UTC) Scope: Vieille femme assise sur un banc à Céleyran (Old woman sitting on a bench in Céleyran) by Toulouse-Lautrec in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2021-06-15 05:20 (UTC) Scope: Olivella semistriata, shell  Support Best in scope and used in 6 Wikipedias. --Tagooty (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: A1Cafel (talk) on 2021-06-15 10:30 (UTC) Scope: Statue of Liberty during Solar eclipse of 2021 June 10  Comment Connecting two Commons categories in a single nomination is not done here. Nice photo, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Scope changed, focus on the eclipse. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Look at the modification of the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Scope is fine. I'm undecided about which photo is best in scope, but I see no reason to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Spurzem (talk) on 2021-06-15 12:13 (UTC) Scope: Allegorical turtle as a reminiscence of the automobile manufacturer August Horch at the Erfinderbrunnen in Koblenz, made by Gernot Rumpf in 1983 Reason: I haven't found a place to put the image in some text yet, but I think it's beautiful and valuable. -- Spurzem (talk)  Comment Beautiful image. The scope appears to be a description of the specific image rather than generic. --Tagooty (talk) 02:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Hallo Tagooty, with the best will, I don't understand what is supposed to be wrong with the scope. Sometimes the description is too short for the critics, sometimes too extensive. I said that this turtle with wheels is a allegorical sculpture as a reminiscence of the German automobile manufacturer Horch. Further you read that it is a part of a fountain (Erfinderbrunnen) made by Gernot Rumpf in 1983. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 07:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC) If I may, I think the scope is OK, and I'm not sure what would be good to remove from it, if a decision were made to do that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC) I get your point about different reviewers giving conflicting advice! It is true that COM:VISC does not specify how to write the scope, so I'll accept the scope that you prefer. I'd like to explain my reasoning for your consideration. To me, the scope needs to be concise, so it is easily understood, so it may be used as a caption for the image in a gallery, etc. It should contain just enough text to uniquely identify the subject, with detailed descriptions elsewhere -- in the filename, summary, etc. E.g. "Turtle sculpture in the Erfinderbrunnen in Koblenz" is unique, the rest to me is redundant. I think "automobile manufacturer" is not a good descripton of August Horch, the term is normally used for a company. The lead sections in en.wiki and de.wiki describe him as a "German engineer", "automobile pioneer", "German mechanical engineer" and "founder of automobile companies Horch and Audi". Once you decide whether or not to modify the scope, I'll support the nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC) I find your explanations grumbling, maybe also as a return coach, because I recently criticized your photo of a stained glass window because of falling lines, which incidentally was inaccurate described. But it doesn't matter what your real reason for rejection is. I don't live on your or anyone else's finding this photo valuable. - Spurzem (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Best in scope --Tagooty (talk) 02:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2021-06-15 16:19 (UTC) Scope: Hospital Vilardebó in 1890  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Spurzem (talk) on 2021-06-15 17:03 (UTC) Scope: Erfinderbrunnen in Koblenz, made by Gernot Rumpf in 1983, total view from southeast Used in: de: Gernot Rumpf, de: Liste der Brunnen in Koblenz, de: Industrie- und Handelskammer zu Koblenz  Support Best in scope and used in de.wikipedia --Tagooty (talk) 02:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-06-16 04:23 (UTC) Scope: Stavoren. Project "Stavers Belang"  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2021-06-16 05:05 (UTC) Scope: Ooliticia meriani, shell  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-16 05:12 (UTC) Scope: Geranium molle (Dove's-foot Crane's-bill) - Plant habit  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-16 05:14 (UTC) Scope: Le jeune Routy à Céleyran (Young Routy in Céleyran) by Toulouse-Lautrec in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Domob (talk) on 2021-06-16 08:28 (UTC) Scope: Landsgemeinde-Brunnen, Appenzell  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2021-06-16 09:09 (UTC) Scope: John Wayne's Cabin, Goulding's Lodge motel, Utah Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2021-06-16 09:38 (UTC) Scope: main building of Jardins des papillons (Hunawihr)  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2021-06-16 09:38 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorials in Haut-Rhin in Illhaeusern  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2021-06-16 09:37 (UTC) Scope: Char M10 Destroyer (Illhaeusern) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2021-06-16 15:25 (UTC) Scope: 0-8-0T Henschel No.15968 (Brigadelok), in Brugelette, Belgique Used in: Pairi Daiza  Support. Useful and used. The picture was slightly tilted. I turned it about 12 degrees to the right. Do you agree? -- Spurzem (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Martinvl (talk) on 2021-06-16 17:33 (UTC) Scope: Tomb of Francis Close, Carlisle Cathedral Reason: The English Wikipedia has an article on Francis Close which gives this image its notability. -- Martinvl (talk)  Support. Good and useful. But I do not see the image in en: Francis Close -- Spurzem (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-16 16:23 (UTC) Scope: St Helens Central railway station building Used in: See global usage  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-16 17:05 (UTC) Scope: Radio City Tower - viewed from Lime Street station Used in: Wikidata:Q2319549 Reason: Another angle is always useful, even for a circular structure, and this is apparently the only view from Lime Street railway station we have and is a closer view than the existing VI. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)  Support Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 20:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-16 19:45 (UTC) Scope: St David's Church, Newton-le-Willows Used in: Wikidata:Q107266674  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2021-06-16 21:16 (UTC) Scope: Käthe Wohlfahrt Weihnachtsdorf in Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Auto Used in: Asquith Motors  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-06-17 04:49 (UTC) Scope: View of the tower from the Grote Kerk Hindeloopen) South east east side.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-17 05:30 (UTC) Scope: Geum urbanum (wood avens) - Buds and flower  Support. Very good, useful and often used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-17 05:08 (UTC) Scope: Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venezia Monument to Doge Giovanni Pesaro - Concord and Justice below Wealth and Study by Josse de Corte  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-17 05:10 (UTC) Scope: Cheval blanc GAZELLE (White horse GAZELLE) by Toulouse-Lautrec in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2021-06-17 05:18 (UTC) Scope: Trepospira discoidalis, shell  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Martinvl (talk) on 2021-06-17 14:04 (UTC) Scope: Southern aspect of the Lanercost Priory  Support But a little vertical correction would be nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-06-17 17:38 (UTC) Scope: Hamamelis × intermedia 'Angelly' New leaves sprouting in April.  Support. Excellent, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)!-- Itemized list of review comments. --> Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-17 13:17 (UTC) Scope: Emmanuel Wargrave Church south side from the east Used in: Wikidata:Q105099746 Reason: An almost complete view of the church due to space constraints, but shows the original architecture -- Rodhullandemu (talk)  Comment If you reduce the scope to the angle of view you can also ask for the label for the face of the church which is even more original. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, have changed scope and have nominated the west end. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Perfec now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-18 07:19 (UTC) Scope: Emmanuel Wargrave Church - west end & spire Used in: Wikidata:Q105099746  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-18 05:00 (UTC) Scope: Graptopetalum paraguayense - leaves  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-18 05:03 (UTC) Scope: Saint-Sulpice-la-Pointe, Tarn, France - The railway bridge over the Agout river. ~*  Support. Beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2021-06-18 07:32 (UTC) Scope: Lirophora latilirata, left valve  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-18 08:28 (UTC) Scope: Vulcan Works relief Used in: Wikidata:Q2011495  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-18 09:32 (UTC) Scope: Vulcan Village - centre Used in: Wikidata:Q107285298 Reason: Vulcan Village is small (population a couple of hundred) and this is the location of the bus stop, post box, telephone box and pub. -- Rodhullandemu (talk) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-06-18 09:27 (UTC) Scope: Manchester Row, Vulcan Village Used in: Wikidata:Q107285298 Reason: View along a typical terrace of worker's cottages, also shows the logo of the iron works that employed them. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2021-06-18 09:56 (UTC) Scope: Église Saint-Martin de Fretin Used in: Wikidata: Q41784419  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-06-18 16:23 (UTC) Scope: Holy-water font, possibly 1st century A.D.  in Cathedral Sainte-Eulalie-et-Sainte-Julie, Elne, France.  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-19 04:38 (UTC) Scope: Geranium molle (Dove's-foot Crane's-bill) - Leaves, buds flower  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-06-19 04:43 (UTC) Scope: Petite chienne blanche (Small white dog) by Toulouse-Lautrec in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-06-19 05:11 (UTC) Scope: White bridge at the harbor office in Stavoren. Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2021-06-19 05:34 (UTC) Scope: Glabrocingulum grayvillense, shell Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Spurzem (talk) on 2021-06-19 09:48 (UTC) Scope: Choir and side altars in St. Georg (Urmitz), 18th century Used in: de: St. Georg (Urmitz Open for review.

Closed valued image candidates

• Promoted valued image candidates
• Declined valued image candidates

Pending Most valued review candidates

Scope: Kreuzberg seen from southwest

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Milseburg (talk) on 2018-04-12 15:12 (UTC) Scope: Kreuzberg seen from southwest Used in: de:Kreuzberg (Rhön) Reason: Most representative view of this prominent mountain -- Milseburg (talk)  Support - Agreed. Best in scope, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the suggested replacement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Milseburg (talk) on 2021-03-30 09:54 (UTC) Scope: Kreuzberg seen from the southwest Reason: New version, higher resolution, better quality, now best in scope -- Milseburg (talk)  Support The key point for VIC is that this photo is in better light and sharper at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Scope: Macaca mulatta

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Yann (talk) on 2010-08-26 07:27 (UTC) Scope: Macaca mulatta  Support This one seems to me the best --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC) MVR Scores: 1. Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra.jpg: +1 <-- 2. Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra, India.jpg: 0 3. Monkey yawning 1.jpg: 0 => File:Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra.jpg: Promoted. <-- File:Rhesus Macaque, Red Fort, Agra, India.jpg: Declined. File:Monkey yawning 1.jpg: Declined. --Myrabella (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-04-26 09:48 (UTC) Scope: Macaca mulatta mulatta (Rhesus macaque), male  Support Much sharper than the other photo at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Scope: Theresa May, portrait photography

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: AlbanGeller (talk) on 2020-06-01 12:57 (UTC) Scope: Theresa May, portrait photography Used in: Theresa May  Comment There is already a promoted image : Theresa May 2015.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: Please see the MVR at COM:VIC#Theresa May, portrait photograph. AlbanGeller (talk) 23:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus, AlbanGeller: Please consider !voting in this MVR. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Best in scope, IMO. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Scores: 1. Theresa May 2015.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) 2. Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: +1 <-- => File:Theresa May 2015.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg: Promoted. <-- Scope changed from Theresa May in 2015, portrait photograph to Theresa May, portrait photography --ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support More flattering. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:15, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) on 2021-05-06 13:05 (UTC) Scope: Theresa May, portrait photography Reason: Best-quality image of Mrs May on the Commons. -- ᴀlbanɢeller (talk)  Question If it's the best image of her, why is the year it was taken significant for the scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: feel free to change the scope if you like. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC) You're the nominator. I'll leave it to you and then see how many photos are in scope before making a decision about which if any I consider best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC) OK Ikan, I'll change the scope to Theresa May. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Please link to only one Commons category. I will see whether there aren't too many photos for me to compare. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC) OK, it looks to me like the category is official portraits of her only, but there's already a VI in that category - see File:Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg. Therefore, if you believe another photo is better in scope, you need to do a Most Valuable Review faceoff. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: OK, I've removed the second category. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 17:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia links aren't normally used in scopes, but my main point is that you need to do a Most Valuable Review. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC) I'll change it back to Theresa May in 2016 for now. Wikipedia link removed. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 21:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)  Oppose I don't think we want to have one VI for each year. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: would you reconsider if I changed the scope back and linked to just Category:Theresa May? ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC) You don't seem to understand: There is already a VI in this scope. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC) OK, understood.  I withdraw my nomination and will nominate a MVR of this image with Theresa May (2015) (cropped).jpg shortly. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment the scope has to be the same for all candidates in an MVR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Scope changed from Theresa May in 2016 to Theresa May --ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Oppose Emphasizes the wrinkles around her eyes more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Scope: Cour d'appel de Colmar

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2017-11-07 18:32 (UTC) Scope: Cour d'appel de Colmar Reason: National heritage site. -- Gzen92 [discuter]  Comment Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)  New version Gzen92 [discuter] 11:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)  Oppose In favour of the newer version Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2021-06-17 08:45 (UTC) Scope: Cour d'appel de Colmar  Support Not a sunny as the other one but building isn't cropped as tightly. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Open for review.

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.