Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

61,287 closed valued image candidates
Closed as		Nominations
Promoted	55,288 (90.2%)
Undecided	3,411 (5.6%)
Declined	2,588 (4.2%)

New valued image nominations

View
Nominated by: Earth605 (talk) on 2025-12-02 06:59 (UTC)
Scope: Pigeons eating bread
Reason: Following Pierre André's counseling. -- Earth605 (talk)
Comment There are numerous errors in the scope and the description. Please read carefully. Here.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Comment There is a problem with the color temperature, everything is too blue, but it's easy to correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Gower (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-12-02 16:39 (UTC)
Scope: Haliastur indus (Brahminy Kite) - in flight with food.
Borderline on image quality. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support Best in scope. Would suggest changing to "in flight with prey" instead of food, but, oh well Earth605 (talk) 15:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-12-04 19:05 (UTC)
Scope: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 APXGP Edition - right front view
Used in: de:F1 (Film), de:Mercedes-AMG C 192
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Earth605 (talk) 06:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2025-12-05
Scope: Myrioblephara idaeoides dorsal
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Earth605 (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2025-12-05
Scope: Callopistria repleta dorsal
Support very good and useful --Gower (talk) 08:19, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Earth605 (talk) 06:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2025-12-05
Scope: Bradina diagonalis dorsal
Oppose good, but left front wing lacks sharpness and we have image wehe both front wings are sharp: File:Bradina diagonalis 569401463.jpg --Gower (talk) 08:26, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Earth605 (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-05 06:24 (UTC)
Scope: Double-bodied vases representing a temple linked to funerary worship - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-05 06:17 (UTC)
Scope: View of Saint Bertrand de Comminges by Louis Sancet
Comment lacks in categorization: no categories related to paintings (medium, theme, country of origin) or to date of inception --Gower (talk) 08:41, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Categories oh that kind: 'October 2025 in Gers' and 'Category:2025 in Auch' are imho redundant in that case, because it is reproduction of a work of art not related directly to 2025 apart from the date the photo itself was taken --Gower (talk) 08:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] If the artist is sufficiently notable for VI, you can create a category for him. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Artist is definetively not notable enough Best in Scope Earth605 (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Done Louis Sancet now has a category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-12-05 06:27 (UTC)
Scope: Placamen isabellina (Isabelle’s Gray Venus), left valve
Support very good as usual --Gower (talk) 08:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-05 08:02 (UTC)
Scope: Dom Polski "Ul" in Bytom, southern elevation
Reason: The building has cultural heritage monument in Poland status. Its name means: Polish House "Beehive". -- Gower (talk)
Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-05 08:14 (UTC)
Scope: 22 Stanisława Olejniczaka Street in Bytom, view from the southeast
Reason: The building and fence have cultural heritage monument in Poland status. -- Gower (talk)
Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-05 07:48 (UTC)
Scope: Cisza Syjonu house in Bytom, western elevation
Reason: The building has cultural heritage monument in Poland status. -- Gower (talk)
Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Tisha Mukherjee (talk) on 2025-12-05 08:21 (UTC)
Scope: Psilopogon asiaticus (Blue-throated Barbet) - eating.
Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-05 09:46 (UTC)
Scope: Coscoroba coscoroba (Coscoroba swan)
Best in Scope --Gower (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-05 09:47 (UTC)
Scope: Coscoroba coscoroba (Coscoroba swans) in flight
Best in Scope I appreciate that the top and bottom sides are in one photo --Gower (talk) 12:44, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-05 09:48 (UTC)
Scope: Coscoroba coscoroba (Coscoroba swans) pair with cygnets
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-12-05 11:52 (UTC)
Scope: Former convent of Santo Stefano (Venice), portal tympanum
Comment portal tympanum is also visible well here: link or here: link2 --Gower (talk) 12:39, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Yes you are right, my mistake. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:46, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Oppose There is already an image being promoted with this scope here: link--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Oppose The image linked by Archaeodontosaurus is way better. -- Earth605 (talk) 14:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 0 support, 2 oppose => declined. Gower (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: JackyM59 (talk) on 2025-12-05 16:26 (UTC)
Scope: Town hall of Auberchicourt - Département du Nord - France
Used in: wikidata wikidata
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Gower (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-12-06 05:29 (UTC)
Scope: Reformierte Kirche Castrisch Church tower.+back of the church.
Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support only one in scope, good --Gower (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-06 06:19 (UTC)
Scope: Vase representing an officiant carrying a ceremonial cup - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-06 06:22 (UTC)
Scope: Belvedere of Square Cuzin in Auch
Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Earth605 (talk) on 2025-12-06 12:46 (UTC)
Scope: Arbutus canariensis - inflorescense
Comment The binomial should be in italics, and it would be more accurate to write "Inflorescence" rather than "flowers"...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Changed, Archaeodontosaurus -- Earth605 (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-12-06 16:41 (UTC)
Scope: *Abat-sons of Saint-Pierre de Flers-Bourg* church**
Used in: Global usage
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Aciarium (talk) on 2025-12-06 16:50 (UTC)
Scope: Hörsaal Elektrotechnik, Montanuniversität Leoben
Question How is this of more than local interest please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:48, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Comment important mining university, but is that lecture room worth our attention for VI? --Gower (talk) 16:10, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Definetily unsuitable scope. The image is irrelevant to any other scope. Earth605 (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Aciarium (talk) on 2025-12-06 16:53 (UTC)
Scope: Metallurgiegebäude (Montanuniversität Leoben), North Facade
Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Aciarium (talk) on 2025-12-06 16:54 (UTC)
Scope: Montanuniversität Leoben - main building, East Facade
Support Useful and used. -- Earth605 (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Aciarium (talk) on 2025-12-06 16:55 (UTC)
Scope: Rittinger-Gebäude, West Entrance
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Aciarium (talk) on 2025-12-06 16:56 (UTC)
Scope: RWZ Leoben, ehemaliges Landesgericht, South Facade
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-06 18:42 (UTC)
Scope: Caracara plancus plancus (Crested caracara) in flight
Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-06 18:45 (UTC)
Scope: Caracara plancus plancus (Crested caracaras) on carcass
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-06 18:46 (UTC)
Scope: Pyrope pyrope (Fire-eyed diucon)
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: August (talk) on 2025-12-07 01:28 (UTC)
Scope: Wien Südbahnhof
Used in: w:de:Wien Südbahnhof
Reason: Best overview over the whole station. -- August (talk)
>* Support Useful and used. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Brihaspati (talk) on 2025-12-06 04:17 (UTC)
Scope: Aerial View of Ahmedabad city
Should crop and rotate please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Comment The scope must be linked to a category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Brihaspati (talk) on 2025-12-07 02:59 (UTC)
Scope: Testing of flyback converters
Comment The scope should be more specific --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Comment The scope must be linked to a category--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Archaeodontosaurus: I think it is already linked to category.--Brihaspati (talk) 12:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Brihaspati: There are a lot of issues with the scope. Read COM:VIS and if you find a suitable one, then change it. For now, I must give this an Oppose vote. Sorry.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Famberhorst (talk) on 2025-12-07 05:37 (UTC)
Scope: Detail from Aua dil Mer Waterfall Above the Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu).
Question How is this of more than local interest please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Answer: This is one of the two main water supply streams used to maintain the large reservoir's water level for generating white energy. Therefore, it's crucial for preventing further global warming.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Scope is way too narrow. Earth605 (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for your comment. What kind of scope do you propose?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I would create a category for Aua dil Mer waterfall specifically and change the scope to: Aua dil Mer waterfall. Earth605 (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Done. Scope adjusted. Thanks for your suggestion.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-07 06:20 (UTC)
Scope: Anthropomorphic ceramic depicting a captive - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I wonder how they concluded it depicts a captive? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] That's the title given by the museum. Titles are standard. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-07 06:21 (UTC)
Scope: Wooden bowl decorated with a frieze of monkeys Culture Chimù - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-12-07 06:44 (UTC)
Scope: Modiolus americanus (Tulip Mussel), right valve
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2025-12-07 09:35 (UTC)
Scope: Pyrocephalus rubinus (Scarlet flycatcher) immature male, lateral view
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2025-12-07 09:42 (UTC)
Scope: Acinonyx jubatus (Cheetah) head, hissing
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2025-12-07 09:48 (UTC)
Scope: Pelecanus onocrotalus (Great white pelican) head, frontal view
Support Useful (the only view exactly frontal) and used --Llez (talk) 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2025-12-07 09:58 (UTC)
Scope: Coracias caudatus (Lilac-breasted roller) in flight, showing wing underside
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2025-12-07 10:06 (UTC)
Scope: Merops apiaster (European bee-eater) in flight, chasing prey
Support excellent --Gower (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-07 10:55 (UTC)
Scope: Chroicocephalus maculipennis (Brown-hooded gull)
Best in Scope --Gower (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-07 10:56 (UTC)
Scope: **Chroicocephalus maculipennis (Brown-hooded gull) with Grimothea monodon**
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-07 11:26 (UTC)
Scope: Chroicocephalus maculipennis (Brown-hooded gull) with Grimothea monodon chased by larus dominicanus (kelp gull)
too sophisticated scope imho (two species added), configuration difficult to repeat --Gower (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support The scope is very precise, there are no problems for me.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Earth605 (talk) on 2025-12-07 14:24 (UTC)
Scope: Bradina diagonalis - dorsal
Best in Scope (my upload BTW ;) --Gower (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Earth605 (talk) on 2025-12-07 16:27 (UTC)
Scope: Hippeastrum hybridum - flower
Comment The image shows a flower of Hippeastrum striatum (Lam.) H.E.Moore. It's a species, not a hybrid. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] and is oversaturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-12-07 16:51 (UTC)
Scope: Horse breeders in Khustain Nuruu National Park (Mongolia), view in Argalant (Mongolia)
Used in: Global usage
Reason: This is an image of a geopark -- Pierre André ^(talk)
Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Shepherds look after sheep. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Charlesjsharp: @Famberhorst: ---- Scope changed from Shepherds in Khustain Nuruu National Park (Mongolia) to Horse breeders in Khustain Nuruu National Park (Mongolia) {{{3}}} Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". . Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] not breeders; herders is Ok. Not sure about the value of the scope though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Pierre André Leclercq: scope category doesn't exist --Gower (talk) 15:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Gower: Thanks for your note Done the good scope category. Best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] ::For me the change is fine.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Oppose* I did suggest the horseman is a herder; can you know he is a breeder too? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Charlesjsharp: Khustaïn Nuruu National Park (over 50,000 hectares) was established in 1992 and chosen for the reintroduction of Przewalski's horse ("Takhi" in Mongolian). I met this rider there who is a horse breeder. I don't know if he also raises sheep. The park is home to approximately 350 of these special horses, the last truly wild breed that humans have never domesticated. More détals. That is why I changed the category to horse breeders in Khustain Nuruu National Park. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:36, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the explanation, though the image has nothing to do with breeding. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-12-08 01:28 (UTC)
Scope: 144 rue de Lastié, Cahors
Previous reviews * Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-08 06:24 (UTC)
Scope: The stream in Jérôme Cuzin Square in Auch
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:57, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Archaeodontosaurus: important category/ies lacking like one connected to the streams in specific region --Gower (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Comment This stream is artificial; it only exists in this part of the garden. The garden is classified as a "Remarkable Garden". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-08 06:28 (UTC)
Scope: Bowl decorated with a frieze of birds - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Earth605 (talk) on 2025-12-08 06:31 (UTC)
Scope: Laugardælir
Reason: The first scope is of the parish/church. The second one refers to it being the best image of the settlement -- Earth605 (talk)
Oppose @Earth605: the church was built in in the 1960s. It is important more than local interest? ("Not any church is worth a Valued Image scope") Two scopes at the same time are not allowed: "An image cannot be nominated with several different scopes within the same nomination." (COM:VIS) --Gower (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] ---- Scope changed from 1. Laugardælasókn 2. Laugardælir to Laugardælir @Gower: -- Earth605 (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Oppose still, photo of the church without any other houses in my opinion is not the best illustration of any settlement, sorry --Gower (talk) 06:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-12-08 06:39 (UTC)
Scope: Modiolus americanus (Tulip Mussel), left valve
Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-08 09:32 (UTC)
Scope: Lophonetta specularioides (Crested duck)
Comment how about that one? File:Crested duck punta arenas 1.19.25 DSC 1628.jpg --Gower (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-08 09:33 (UTC)
Scope: Lophonetta specularioides (Crested duck) with chick
Support very good and useful photo --Gower (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-08 09:34 (UTC)
Scope: Aramides ypecaha (Giant wood-rail)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Earth605 (talk) on 2025-12-08 14:55 (UTC)
Scope: Tower of Casa de las Bolas, Madrid
building is worth VI but nominated photo shows only small part of elevations (look here: link to the map); other images are also not very good for VI imho. --Gower (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] What do you mean by "small part of elevations"? What do you even mean with "elevations" @Gower: ?! Earth605 (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Earth605: I mean that is quite big building and nominated photo shows less than 50% of its exterior. Elevation in Cambridge Dictionary means: "the front or side of a building" --Gower (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Scope changed from Casa de las Bolas, Madrid to Tower at Casa de las Bolas, Madrid @Gower: --Earth605 (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Comment @Earth605: you need to change scope also in "scope" field at the nomination page --Gower (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Best in Scope after scope change, but it's a pity that it was cut from the bottom --Gower (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-08 15:24 (UTC)
Scope: 22 Henryka Dąbrowskiego Street in Chorzów, southeastern elevation
Reason: Villa di Biasi, cultural heritage monument in Poland. -- Gower (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-08 15:31 (UTC)
Scope: Hospital chapel in Świętochłowice, facade
Reason: Cultural heritage monument in Poland. -- Gower (talk)
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-08 15:36 (UTC)
Scope: Saint Joseph church in Chorzów, facade
Reason: Cultural heritage monument in Poland. -- Gower (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-12-08 17:45 (UTC)
Scope: Landau carriage in stables of Marshal de Saxe (Château de Chambord), front and right side
Used in: Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2025-12-08 23:30 (UTC)
Scope: Merops apiaster (European bee-eater) defecating
Comment @Giles Laurent: very good, but lacks coordinates (this species is not endangered so far) --Gower (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Done @Gower -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support good and probably only one in this unusual scope --Gower (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-09 05:09 (UTC)
Scope: Kalide house in Chorzów, view from the west
Reason: Cultural heritage monument in Poland, one of the oldest surviving houses in Chorzów. -- Gower (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-09 05:15 (UTC)
Scope: 2 Bałtycka Street in Chorzów, view from the south
Reason: Cultural heritage monument in Poland. -- Gower (talk)
Question Does A/385/12 refer to this building? I have no idea how the registry works. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @Charlesjsharp: yes, A/385/12 refers exactly to this building: "A" is immovable national register book of cultural heritage monuments in Poland (we have also "B" for movable and "C" for archaelogical ones), "385" – number of cultural heritage monument listed in a specific year, "12", short for year 2012. I updated footnote on Wikidata with working PDF file if you want to check it :) --Gower (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support I was just curious. Listed buildings are good for VI. We just get too many nominations for buildings or bits of buildings that are not in any way notable/valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Gower (talk) on 2025-12-09 05:12 (UTC)
Scope: 9 Świętego Piotra Street in Chorzów, southeastern elevation
Reason: Cultural heritage monument in Poland. -- Gower (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-12-09 06:22 (UTC)
Scope: Lunulicardia hemicardium (Pacific Half Cockle), white form, right valve
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-09 06:45 (UTC)
Scope: Figure carrying chili pepper plants - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Support Useful and used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-12-09 06:43 (UTC)
Scope: Head of a Sleeping Woman by Sylvain Salières - Musée des Amériques - Auch
Comment sculpture subject not represented in categories --Gower (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: *KuldeepBurjBhalaike* ^(Talk) on 2025-12-09 08:19 (UTC)
Scope: Takht Sri Damdama Sahib, view from north-east
Comment unfavorable light, it could be something like this at the other time of the day: link --Gower (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-09 09:40 (UTC)
Scope: Tyrannus savana savana (Fork-tailed flycatcher)
Best in Scope --Gower (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-09 09:41 (UTC)
Scope: Tyrannus savana savana (Fork-tailed flycatcher) young adult
Support very good and useful --Gower (talk) 17:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-12-09 09:42 (UTC)
Scope: Hylocharis chrysura (Gilded hummingbird)
Comment hard choice, that one with QI is also very good: link --Gower (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: *KuldeepBurjBhalaike* ^(Talk) on 2025-12-09 10:26 (UTC)
Scope: Gurdwara Likhansar Sahib, view from south
Support good photo and useful one --Gower (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: *KuldeepBurjBhalaike* ^(Talk) on 2025-12-09 10:35 (UTC)
Scope: Central Gurdwara Saheb, Hyderabad, view from north-west
Comment @Kuldeepburjbhalaike: good but I recommend vertical perspective correction and adding coordinates (obligatory) --Gower (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: JackyM59 (talk) on 2025-12-09 19:45 (UTC)
Scope: Mairie de Somain - Nord - France
Used in: wikidata wikidata
Open for review.

Closed valued image candidates

Pending Most valued review candidates

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.