|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Massimo510 (talk) on 2022-06-25 7:16 (UTC) |
Scope:
Breviceps gibbosus (Cape rain frog) - South Africa |
Used in:
See global usage |
Reason:
Used not only in the page for its own species but also in the page for its family -- Massimo510 (talk) |
Comment Per COM:VIS, there are domain-specific scope guidelines for animals, including amphibians, advising that the scope be in the form of scientific name (vernacular name), sub-scope. Please revise. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:23, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The scope is now acceptable but it requires a geocoding of the image in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk)
Comment ok i have a added a caption to the image showing the location let me know if it is acceptable.Massimo510 (talk)
talk]])talk]]) 05:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment This nomination is appropriate for VI consideration but I agree with Archaeodontosaurus that GPS coordinates should be added to the image description per COM:VICR(5). --GRDN711 (talk) 01:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An estimated geocoding would seem to me sufficient in this case.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its habitat range is quite small so i will try to find the estimated location and how would i be able to mark it as estimated loction Massimo510 (talk) 08:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Template:Location for {{Location |1= |2= |3= }} to add GPS coordinates.
- Template:Location estimated for {{Location estimated}} as an option to place a notice that GPS coordinates are estimated and not uploaded from camera metadata. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Approximant location has been added to the image let me know if it is good Massimo510 (talk) 23:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2022-07-01 12:36 (UTC) |
Scope:
Detail "Steppenelefant" of Historienstein Raiffeisenplatz Kärlich by Paul Milles |
- What's going on again? A monument is not a biological textbook. For a while I thought the bullying was going away. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- If you choose to use an obsolete taxonomy, please use correct spelling. @Archaeodontosaurus: Can you advise whether an obsolete taxonomy is suitable for this VI please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The taxonomy was taken from a 1981 publication by a local archaeologist. In order to avoid a dispute about possible new scientific terms, I have reduced the scope to a neutral formulation. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
 Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-07-02 04:26 (UTC) |
Scope:
Coloquio galante - Francisco de Goya - Musée des Beaux-Arts d'Agen (Gallant colloquium) |
Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question A very similar Goya painting, known as in English as The flirtation is in the Marquis of La Romana Collection, Madrid, Spain. Is this one a copy? It does not look to be by the same artist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question RSVP Archaeodontosaurus Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I have seen the painting but I have no information other than that of the two museums. There must be two versions, it's quite common, that's why we give the place of exposure in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The the Spanish Goya website: "There is another version of The Flirtation in the Agen Museum, considered to be an original Goya by some authors such as Gudiol (although it is likely to be a copy)." I 100% agree but your nomination is OK! If it were me, I would add attr.. Gallant colloquium is not English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe we could put Amorous discussion --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Review it! (edit) |
Nominated by:
Ryse93 (talk) on 2022-07-03 11:42 (UTC) |
Scope:
STABILO BOSS |
Comment There are other images of the Stabilo Boss text marker, including some by you. Tjhe first two markers in this image are not sharp. Why do you think this image is most valuable? --GRDN711 (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @GRDN711: I think it is the most valuable image since it highlights the highlighters well and the image has good resolution. And if not I have this image File:Stabilo Boss Original (5).jpg, for you it will be better? --Ryse93 (talk) 20:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|