Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

30,512 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			27,023 (88.6%)
Undecided			1,566 (5.1%)
Declined			1,923 (6.3%)

New valued image nominations

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Masum-al-Hasan on 2018-04-13 09:22 (UTC) Scope: Cover of Mahe Nou magazine published from Dhaka since 1949  Comment You need to get the name of the magazine right and specify which issue it is. Charles (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-15 18:51 (UTC) Scope: Plocepasser mahali pectoralis (White-browed sparrow-weaver) male  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-15 18:51 (UTC) Scope: Plocepasser mahali ansorgei (White-browed sparrow-weaver) female  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-15 18:54 (UTC) Scope: Crocuta crocuta (Spotted hyena)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: T.Bednarz (talk) on 2018-04-15 19:36 (UTC) Scope: Synagogue in Nový Jičín  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-16 05:05 (UTC) Scope: Langia zenzeroides nawai mounted specimen male ventral  Support useful. You need to alter gallery to indicate first batch of photos is ssp zenzeroides. Charles (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)  Done thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-16 05:08 (UTC) Scope: The preaching of John the Baptist by Francesco Bassano (II) in San Giacomo dall'Orio (Venice)  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-16 05:10 (UTC) Scope: Chloris caressée par Zéphir by James Pradier - Musée des Augustins de Toulouse  Support Used, useful and best in scope for me -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2018-04-16 06:38 (UTC) Scope: Lagopus muta islandorum eggs  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Peulle (talk) on 2018-04-16 08:21 (UTC) Scope: Harry Truman portrait painting. Used in: Extensive use on Wikipedia.  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: El Grafo (talk) on 2018-04-16 08:28 (UTC) Scope: Revue DIA 100, 135 film cartridge Reason:  Info This is actually re-badged Agfa film, sold under the Revue brand by the German distributor Foto-Quelle. Quelle was the German equivalent of Sears or Hanimex, and the Foto-Quelle branch sold re-badged versions of pretty much everything from 135 film rolls to medium format cameras (see Camera Wiki for some info). As such, this is a tiny little piece of the lower-end consumer side of the history of the photographic industry in Europe. -- El Grafo (talk) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: El Grafo (talk) on 2018-04-16 09:19 (UTC) Scope: AgfaPhoto APX 400, 135 film cartridge Reason:  Info Another example of the weird re-branding practices in the photographic industry. While you can still buy film made by Agfa Gevaert under the "Rollei" and "Japan Camera Hunter" brands, this Agfa-branded film is not made by Agfa (see film box). Word on the street is that it's very similar to Kentmere 400 and I can personally confirm that both the carton box and the plastic canister are identical to those of Ilford films, so it's very likely that they're produced by Harman in the UK. -- El Grafo (talk) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-04-16 14:50 (UTC) Scope: Cine Teatre Jardí in Figueres, Spain (view NW)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-16 16:53 (UTC) Scope: Loxodonta africana (African bush elephants) female with six-week-old baby  Comment The image is not placed in the right category : Loxodonta africana (adults with juveniles) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Done I spent ages creating new categories and moving dozens of images into them then forgot to do mine! 16:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Charles (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment This is a mistake I make myself very often --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-16 16:54 (UTC) Scope: Loxodonta africana (African bush elephant) baby 6 weeks old  Comment The image is not placed in the right category : Loxodonta africana (juvenile) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)* Done Charles (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-16 16:55 (UTC) Scope: Loxodonta africana (African bush elephant) spraying water from trunk  Comment The image is not placed in the right category : Loxodonta africana in water --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Done Charles (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Jaqen (talk) on 2018-04-16 17:02 (UTC) Scope: Renato Ballardini Used in: de:Renato Ballardini, fr:Renato Ballardini, it:Renato Ballardini,  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Jaqen (talk) on 2018-04-16 17:05 (UTC) Scope: B.J. Elder Used in: fr:B. J. Elder, it:B.J. Elder, d:Q3631677  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2018-04-16 17:39 (UTC) Scope: Alain de Cadenet portrait, profile picture Used in: de:Alain de Cadenet, en:Alain de Cadenet, fr:Alain de Cadenet, pl:Alain de Cadenet, sv:Alain de Cadenet  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: T.Bednarz (talk) on 2018-04-16 19:24 (UTC) Scope: Antošovice, Saints Peter and Paul chapel  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2018-04-16 19:34 (UTC) Scope: Caecum glabellum, shell  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-04-16 22:56 (UTC) Scope: Yew Tree House, Halewood Used in: en:wp:Listed buildings in Halewood  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-17 05:03 (UTC) Scope: Macroglossum insipida papuanum Mounted specimen male dorsal  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-17 05:06 (UTC) Scope: Agony of Christ in the garden with client by Tizianello in San Giacomo dall'Orio (Venice)  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-17 05:08 (UTC) Scope: Portrait of the Spanish painter Matías Moreno by Carolus-Duran. Musée des Augustins, de Toulouse  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Famberhorst (talk) on 2018-04-17 05:13 (UTC) Scope: Category:GINAF X 4446 TS GINAF truck X 4446 TS.  Comment the other truck in the gallery is a much better VI if it's the same model. Charles (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC) OK. thank you for comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2018-04-17 07:15 (UTC) Scope: Lagopus muta rupestris egg  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: PJDespa (talk) on 2018-04-17 09:48 (UTC) Scope: Rocks of Comblain-la-Tour, Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium Used in: List of protected heritage sites in Hamoir  Comment - File:Rocher de la Vierge à Comblain-la-Tour et Xhoris.jpg looks like a more comprehensive picture of the entire group of rocks, and therefore, more useful, but please argue for why this one is more useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Best in Scope Rocher de la Vierge à Comblain-la-Tour et Xhoris.jpg This image has too much chromatic aberration --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment - OK, understood, but that image shows the entire group of rocks and this doesn't, so how can this be sufficiently useful? I question that. Maybe neither photo should be a VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Yann (talk) on 2018-04-17 14:26 (UTC) Scope: Jeanne Guionie Reason: French soprano (1879-1976). Studio shot, so no geolocation. -- Yann (talk)  Comment - My initial reaction is that the other two photos of her in the category (including the other version of this photo) are probably better in scope, though the ideal thing would be a good digital restoration. I'd like to consider your argument, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC) This one is high resolution, and grayscale, as it is a black and white picture. However I could make a second nomination. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-17 16:29 (UTC) Scope: Loxodonta africana (Desert elephant) spraying sand while guarding young  Comment There is a specific category for this image. Loxodonta africana dustbathing --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment Yes, but those are all African bush (or savanna) elephants, not desert elephants - very different animals with distinct behaviours. One interesting difference (I was told and have observed) is that desert elephants are much more gentle with the trees they eat as there are so few around. Also, the desert elephant covers its young with branches while they sleep - I've not seen this with the African bush elephant. Charles (talk) 09:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)  Support The two logics are worth, in any case very beautiful image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-17 12:51 (UTC) Scope: Aquila spilogaster (African hawk eagles) pair, showing back feathers Previous Review undecided  Oppose, I suppose this picture is better than a nominated one because of close-up and front view. Voltmetro 07:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC) But Voltmetro, that's not a picture of a pair. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC) Yes but at the scope field wrote about A. spilogaster as Species, not about a pair. Voltmetro 07:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC) So the nominator should change a category to an other one connected to pairs of these birds. Voltmetro 07:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment Back feathers and front front can constitute different scopes (like with a motor car or building) if they are considered valuable, as I believe is the case for this species. The chosen category is correct. Charles (talk) 09:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC) Voltmetro, please reread the scope. It is indeed a pair, and in fact more specific than that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC) There is an category Aquila spilogaster with description, not category connented to Pairs of Aquila spilogaster. Voltmetro 10:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)  Support - I agree with Charles that this is a useful scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment Voltmetro: What we're judging here is not the linked category but the scope, as shown in the "scope" field. You are basing your vote on irrelevant criteria, and therefore, I think it's not appropriate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC) All that wrote in scope field must connect with category but I don't think that "pair" can relate to category of birds species, sorry. The mere mention of that is shown in the photo pair of birds is not enough to relate "pair" to species. Voltmetro 19:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC) I don't understand what you mean to say. Can you restate your remark some other way? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Scope is a generic field (pairs if not generic, it's specific field) or category (in our case), NOT simple description of the image. The scope nominated here is Aquila spilogaster, NOT Pairs of Aquila spilogaster. If the nominator changes a category to that OR nominates this picture with no changes (has already nominated), I will revise my opinion and support the image. Voltmetro 10:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC) The scope is "Aquila spilogaster (African hawk eagles) pair, showing back feathers". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC) It's not scope, it's simple description. It could be a scope if there was an article about pairs of birds but I've never seen any page like that. So this scope is meaningless and probably never used in future. I don't see any reason to promote this picture to VIC, it maybe a quality image because of a great composition and the photographer's ability, but really unusable for VIC in my opinion. Sorry. Voltmetro 09:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment - It's a pity that no-one has decided to vote so as to break this unfortunate tie. I realize that there are some people who refuse to vote for any photo at VIC unless it's already used in a Wikipedia article - an irrelevant criterion, but no-one can be forced to vote. It would be truly unfortunate for a photo to lose out on being promoted because of a misunderstanding of the difference between a Commons category and a VI scope, though, don't you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-17 12:13 (UTC) Scope: Cinnyris fuscus (Dusky sunbird) male drinking Previous review undecided  Oppose This nomination is better to depict a scope. Voltmetro 18:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment I think it would be helpful Voltmetro if you take the trouble to read the VI guidelines on suitable scopes. Charles (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)  Support - Obviously useful, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-04-17 18:31 (UTC) Scope: Church of Notre-Dame du Gua in Aubin, eastern exposure Used in: fr:Liste des monuments historiques de l'Aveyron  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-18 04:52 (UTC) Scope: Macroglossum insipida papuanum Mounted specimen male ventral  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-18 04:58 (UTC) Scope: Church of San Salvatore (Venice) - The first cloister  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-18 04:59 (UTC) Scope: Diana by Alexandre Falguière Marble  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: Since you made the Musée des Augustins part of the scope I would expect to see the statue in its museum environment (like here. Suggest to remove the location from the scope, it's irrelevant for the image. --El Grafo (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment Why not, the caption is sufficiently explicit. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)  Support – just FTR ;-) --El Grafo (talk) 17:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2018-04-18 06:10 (UTC) Scope: Tetrastes bonasia rupestris egg  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2018-04-18 06:26 (UTC) Scope: Art of Siwa-Triple bracelet  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-04-18 16:57 (UTC) Scope: Saint Julian Church in Cransac, north-western exposure Used in: pl:Cransac  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Christian Ferrer (talk) on 2018-04-18 17:02 (UTC) Scope: Vieux Crabe (ship, 1951)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2018-04-18 18:01 (UTC) Scope: Caecum vitreum, shell  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-04-18 19:10 (UTC) Scope: Saint Peter Church of Canet-de-Salars, south-eastern exposure Used in: fr:Liste des monuments historiques de l'Aveyron  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-18 21:44 (UTC) Scope: Charadrius marginatus (White-fronted plover) juvenile  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-18 21:45 (UTC) Scope: Crithagra albogularis crocopygia (White-throated canary)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-18 21:45 (UTC) Scope: Hirundo smithii smithii (Wire-tailed swallow)  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: -- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-04-18 21:48 (UTC) Scope: St Mary Magdalene Church, Sandringham, Norfolk from the north Used in: en:Sandringham, Norfolk, en:Burial places of British royalty, en:St. Mary Magdalene Church, Sandringham  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-19 04:53 (UTC) Scope: Cypa decolor Mounted specimen female dorsal Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-19 04:55 (UTC) Scope: Jesus Christ washing the feet of the apostles M. Colonna in San Giacomo dall'Orio (Venice) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-04-19 04:57 (UTC) Scope: Summer by Antonin Mercié Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: —Vensatry (Ping me) on 2018-04-19 06:55 (UTC) Scope: Brinda Karat Used in: Brinda Karat Reason: Best in scope -- —Vensatry (Ping me) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-19 09:10 (UTC) Scope: Agama planiceps (Namib rock agama) male Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-19 09:11 (UTC) Scope: Agama planiceps (Namib rock agama) female Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-19 09:12 (UTC) Scope: Agama planiceps (Namib rock agama) female head  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2018-04-19 09:48 (UTC) Scope: Lagopus muta helvetica eggs Open for review.

Closed valued image candidates

• Promoted valued image candidates
• Declined valued image candidates

Pending Most valued review candidates

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Lenbachhaus: Foster extension, worm's-eye view

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2018-03-31 10:36 (UTC) Scope: Lenbachhaus: Foster extension, worm's-eye view Used in: de:Städtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus Reason: only image in scope -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)  Support Nice picture, used. Voltmetro 14:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment But I'm not sure this justifies a scope. Charles (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2018-04-16 06:28 (UTC) Scope: Lenbachhaus: Foster extension, worm's-eye view Used in: de:Städtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus Reason: The ongoing discussion at FPC made clear that this alternative (which is also likely to be promoted to FP has been promoted to FP) is the superior and thus also more valuable image. -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)  Support better Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.

Canis mesomelas mesomelas (Black-backed jackal)

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Lycaon (talk) on 2009-01-23 16:38 (UTC) Scope: Canis mesomelas (Black-backed Jackal) Used in: ar:ابن آوى أسود الظهر, bg:Черногръб чакал, da:Skaberaksjakal, de:Schabrackenschakal, en:Black-backed Jackal, en:Canis, es:Canis mesomelas, fi:Koirat, fr:Chacal à chabraque, gl:Chacal, he:תן שחור, hu:Panyókás sakál, io:Shakalo, it:Canis mesomelas, ja:セグロジャッカル, ko:검은등자칼, ko:자칼, la:Thos, lt:Juodnugaris šakalas, nl:Roofdieren, nl:Zadeljakhals, pl:Canini, pl:Szakal czaprakowy, pt:Chacal-de-dorso-negro, ru:Чепрачный шакал, species:Canis mesomelas, sv:Schabrakschakal, tr:Kara sırtlı çakal, tr:Namib Çölü, uk:Чепрачний шакал, zh:黑背胡狼  Support Best pic in the cat, criteria fulfilled. --Eusebius (talk) 10:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Eusebius (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2018-04-17 16:47 (UTC) Scope: Canis mesomelas mesomelas (Black-backed jackal)  Support clearly better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Oppose I disagree. Technical quality at 100% zoom is certainly better, but that does not matter at the 480px review size. I don't see what would make this one better from a VI point of view. The fur at the back looks unusually messy as if s/he's just come out of a fight. The paws are not visible in this one. --El Grafo (talk) 07:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Open for review.