File talk:Example.svg

SVG开发

InfoField

 

本W3C无效的矢量图使用Inkscape创作，或使用了其他工具。

{{Edit request}} Please replace all cats with Category:SVG example images‎ ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  14:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 17:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

{{Edit request}} Please add a german description "Beispielbild als [[de:Scalable Vector Graphics|SVG]]-Datei" --C₂₁H₂₂N₂O₂ (留言) 20:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Storkk (留言) 13:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, the link isn't working. In front of the "de" must be a ":" (":de:..."). --C₂₁H₂₂N₂O₂ | talk | de.en 17:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks... fixed now, using the same style of {{W}} links as the other en and fr. Storkk (留言) 15:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 2020-05-22

{{Edit request}}

Please add {{Protected}} to the page to tag it per Commons:Protection policy. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done as requested. I could see a similar note as well, generated automatically. --Green Giant (留言) 19:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The quality of the Example.svg

Hello, I would discuss the quality of the given SVG. Usually, the SVG files with quality provided in the given file marked with the special template tag about "poorly traced bad SVG" or something similar. Is it showing "just another example" of the poor quality SVG file uploaded on the Commons on the purpose? Pacha Tchernof (留言) 20:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Editprotected}}

In any way, I've created a similar SVG with properly traced letters as an alternative to the current. If someone could put it in the "other versions" field of the "Information" template on the description page, that would be great. Thanks for your attention! -- Pacha Tchernof (留言) 12:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I don’t consider it to be of “poor quality”. It’s just an unusual font, which seems to be rather an artistic decision than a technical error. Actually I like this image better than yours—the serif font you used is just boring. —Tacsipacsi (留言) 23:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done GMG^talk 10:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)