User talk:JuTa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Restore requests[edit]

Hi JuTa. Please restore the following files that were used in the article

The copyright holder's permission has been sent to Permissions - Wikimedia Commons on April, 23 2018 (by Sergey Gritsenko).

Thank you in advance.

With regards from Irina

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Articleinfo (talk • contribs) 11:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Articleinfo, the files are back and I put {{OTRS pending}} onto its description page. Next time please do this yourself, that defents against such deletions. --JuTa 16:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! --Articleinfo 11:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Undelete/Restore requests[edit]

Hi JuTa. I do not know why you deleted


used in

The artist is Tor Lier - AKA Waldemar Hepstein ( - I have sent 3 mails (the last one on April 20th) to you ( confirming that we have written permission from the artist under the Creative Commons License, but I receive no answers.

Here is a copy of the email from Tor/Waldemar:

" I - Tor Lier - under the artistic pseudonym of Waldemar Hepstein - hereby confirm that my two images below are free for all to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International ( license


With regards from Tor Lier, aka "

Could you please restore?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Erikaabe (talk • contribs) 14:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

With regards from Erik Aaberg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Erikaabe (talk • contribs) 14:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Erikaabe, I restored the file and added {{OTRS pending}} to its description page. Next time please do this yourself, because thats the only way an admin can see that such an email was sent to the commons support team. regards --JuTa 15:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Ju. I was not aware of the "OTRS pending" feature. I thought a reference to the ticket number in an email was sufficient. With regards from Erikaabe.

File:Autocesta A1.svg vs File:A1-SRB.svg[edit]

Hi JuTa,

I would like to warn you about incorrect (and unfair) edit when you redirected File:Autocesta A1.svg to File:A1-SRB.svg. Originally, File:Autocesta A1.svg referred to Croatian A1, while File:A1-SRB.svg referred to Serbian A1. As you can see, on 25 April 2018 user Ђидо uploaded new version of File:A1-SRB.svg. That new version is actually downloaded from File:Autocesta A1.svg which was uploaded long ago. Now we have following situation: A1-SRB.svg stands everywhere, even on articles about Croatian A1 and articles and templates about Croatian highways. Please, undo edits and return File:Autocesta A1.svg as specific file. Thanks! --IvanOS (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I revered the upload of the first file, restored the second one and undid the commonsDelinker edits. I hope I didnt missing something. regards. --JuTa 13:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi JuTa, why you are keep reverting my version of A1-SRB.svg? -- yes, I used copy of Croatian A1 sign, because they are identical in appearance, but, conceptually, they are different signs, prescribed by two different jurisdictions -- take, for example, Latin script "A" letter and Cyrillic "А" letter. Although they appear same on the screen, they are two different code points in Unicode because semantic of usage is different. So, sign for A1 motorway in Croatia, and A1 motorway in Serbia (and in Macedonia, which uses same-looking graphic) are semantically different. They are not same symbol. Moreover, version you keep reverting to is not official sign of A1 motorway anywhere, and definitely not in Serbia, so it is wrong to use, as it would be equally wrong to use Croatian traffic sign for Serbian motorway. Ђидо (talk) 05:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi JuTa, since you again merged File:Autocesta A1.svg and File:A1-SRB.svg, I have to warn you again about some illogical and unfair issue. This time, name of "common" file is not bad, File:Motorway-A1-Hex-Green.svg. But, way of merging is still not fair. See, current version was made and uploaded by Tomobe03 in 2010 as File:Autocesta A1.svg, while version which is not used anymore was firstly uploaded in 2011 by Daniel749 as File:A1-SRB.svg. But, if you check File history of File:Motorway-A1-Hex-Green.svg, you will see there is no evidence that version of file, which is currently used, was actually uploaded by Tomobe03 in 2010. That's not fair to Tomobe03! I suggest restoring of Tomobe03's File:Autocesta A1.svg. It can be used also for other countries, not only Croatia, considering Autocesta A1 is also neutral name. Also, restore Daniel749's File:A1-SRB.svg, but with Fredddie's version from 10 September 2017, and rename it to neutral name, for example File:Motorway-A1-Rect-Green.svg, where Rect refers to rectangle shape. Then both files can be used, depending on country. Thanks! --IvanOS (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Same for Autocesta A2.svg, Autocesta A3.svg, Autocesta A4.svg, Autocesta A5.svg, Autocesta A6.svg, Autocesta A7.svg, Autocesta A8.svg, Autocesta A9.svg, Autocesta A10.svg, Autocesta A11.svg. --IvanOS (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, the files are public domain anyhow. There is in fact no need to name any author. I named him nontheless. The kept one is the one with much more (different) versions uploaded, thats the reason I kept that one and not the other. regards. --JuTa 20:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Both signs (file versions) may be used, depends on country. That's why I suggest you to restore Tomobe03's Autocesta A1.svg with its version (which is currently used in "common" file) and restoration of Daniel749's A1-SRB.svg under neutral name and with version from 10 September 2017. Review on current situation: Tomobe03's file was uploaded in May 2010 while Daniel749 uploaded his file in September 2011. Now, when files are equalized, wouldn't be more logic to move copy (A1-SRB.svg, now Motorway-A1-Hex-Green.svg) to original (Autocesta A1.svg) instead of this way (original->copy)? It wasn't okay to talk only with Ђидо about moving and renaming of someone's file without opinion and consent of other side. Whatever, please, consider my suggestion: it would be more fair and effective. Thanks! --IvanOS (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry but my answer is no. He is named as author, even if the file history doesnt refect this. The only thing I see would be a history merge, which is a lot of work not realy woth of it. It means 1) restore the autostada files. 2) remove the current versions of the merged file 3) rename the autostrada file 4) restore the now deleted version os the merged file. This would result a mixed up page history which could be confusing as well. You could try to raise a Commons:Undeletion request. Maybe you are able to convince another admin to do this. regards --JuTa 21:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

File name[edit]

Can you move this file, according to this, please?--MaGa 13:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much.--MaGa 13:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I revered the upload of the first file, restored the second one and undid the commonsDelinker edits. I hope I didnt missing something. regards. --JuTa 13:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm interested for Autocesta A1.svg file, the other one is irrelevant for me. Thanks again.--MaGa 16:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

After your recent actions about this, I'm a little bit disappointed. I think that older file should be kept with his history, and that is Tomobe03's file, not another one.--MaGa 05:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Please see my reason in the section above. --JuTa 05:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion, merging is not necessary. While I was admin at hr.wp, any newer duplicated file (or article) was deleted, without any question. The name of file in this case is (in my opinion) irrelevant.--MaGa 08:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Its not about the name. Its about the different versions which who ever could pick up and use as well, because they are free too. --JuTa 10:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Deleting files of the Art+Feminism event in Geneva[edit]

Hi JuTA, I just see now updating our work for our whole project last year with the dash board that this file File:Buste d'homme, sculpture de Marie-Josèphe Cêtre.jpg was deleted by you. We do not need OTRS ticket for this file as the photographer is Mampoge. Other files that you deleted in may 2017 have the same problematic:

These photos are the only trace of a prominent personnality of the women's lib movement and LGBTIQ community in Geneva. She used to sell these potteries to make a living, which is why we photographed the last existing ones.

@Yann, Mapomge, Kvardek du:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nattes à chat (talk • contribs) 2018-05-09T14:42:24‎ (UTC)
Hi Nattes à chat, please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case, as Im no member of the OTRS team and cannot read the mails. But note: We need permission not only by the photopgrapher but also by the artist of the depicted sculptures. regards. --JuTa 15:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Freigaben für gelöschte Bilder eingetroffen[edit]

Im Ticket Ticket#2018051210003861 sind mittlerweile die Freigaben für File:AfraTestFall2Item1.jpg, File:Afra2TestBogenS1.jpg, File:AfraTestFall2EingabeMaske.jpg und File:LogoLrsZentrum.png eingetroffen. Du hattest die Bilder mangels Freigaben gelöscht. Sei so nett, schau Dir das mal an und stell die Bilder wieder her - ich habe auf den Commons keine Admin-Rechte, kann Dir diese Arbeit also nicht abnehmen. Ich trag die Lizenzen dann schon nach. Viele Grüße Redlinux (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Redlinux , die ersten 3 hab ichwiederhergestellt. das 4. war nie gelöcht. Bitte trag die Freigebe etc. noch mach. Gruß --JuTa 12:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hallo zusammen! Danke für die Wiederherstellung der gelöschten Bilddateien. Da die Verweise im Artikel ebenfalls gelöscht worden waren, habe ich die nun ebenfalls wieder hergestellt! Grüße --Kalle Herné (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hallo JuTa besten Dank. Ich trage die Lizenzen nach. Viele Grüße Redlinux (talk) 10:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Bild gelöscht[edit]

Hallo JuTa, du hast gestern das Bild: „File:GfK Kaufkraft Deutschland 2018.jpg“ gelöscht, da angeblich keine OTRS-Genehmigung vorliegt. Ich verstehe das nicht, denn am 01.03.2018 hat die Rechteinhaberin eine Bildfreigabe an die Adresse gesendet. Eine Kopie dieser E-Mail liegt mir vor. Viele Grüße --JoeHard (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

hi JoeHard, wenn sich nichts an der Bildbeschreibung ändert - sprich ein OTRS Mitarbeiter die Freigabe bestätigt - fallen die Bilder nach gut 2 Monaten automatisch in eine "bitte löschen" Kategorie. Bitte wende Dich - gerne auch auf deutsch - an Commons:OTRS noticeboard. Kann sein dass der Fall schlicht vergessen wurde, kann sein dass die Freigabe nicht OK war oder Rückfragen nicht beantwortet wurden, oder, oder, oder. Gruß --JuTa 16:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Danke für die Info. JoeHard (talk) 18:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Bilder gelöscht[edit]

These all were, to the best of my knowledge, rights-cleared via email in 2016. As you can see from their history, the first two were explicitly undeleted before after email confirmation. I've asked about finding the right person to re-confirm the license of the rest -- this would be easier to confirm if all parties can look at the undeleted pages while referencing them via OTRS. Could you please undelete all 10 while this is happening? Thanks, --SJ+ 22:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

I believe these were released in a series of auto-submitted threads following ticket 2016072510000875. Certainly most were, two of them the ones previously undeleted. Masur, please advise. I was able to find in my email (I requested the release and was copied on one thread) a bit of that old discussion. It is ... truly astonishing that it is impossible for us all to review the OTRS thread, or even confirm its existence; and impossible to have this discussion attached to the images in question because they are deleted. Let's use methods that optimize for a different experience, please. --SJ+ 22:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, the files are abck. I've places template {{OTRS pending}} to their description page. Next time please do this yourself, because thats the only way an admin could see that OTRS is in progress. --JuTa 01:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks, & I will. OTRS thread started. And one more that I missed: MM-Gemini.jpg --SJ+ 12:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
OK, done. --JuTa 16:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I Sent in Licence Permissions as requested[edit]

Greetings, Thank you for the great work being done to make Wikipedia a great platform and community. A photo I uploaded to the Wikipedia page hereÀkin was deleted as you required I provide permission for it.

I have gotten the permission and sent to the email. Copy of my request for permission, Copy of Permission granted Copy of Acknowledged letter. Please look into it and revert on it please.

Thank You.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Delords (talk • contribs) 01:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, its back, but next time please put template {{OTRS pending}} onto the file description page, as I did it now. Thats the only method dor admins to see Commons:OTRS process is in progress. --JuTa 01:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

On the file:Trascendentals.png[edit]

Hi JuTa, could you please help me by giving your opinion on the file I just uploaded? Based on your experience, is it different enough from the original logo ( from, and from, or does it create copyright issues? Thanks so much. --Mauro Lanari (talk) 11:25, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Ho, it isnt. Commons accepts only free licenses - see Commons:Licensing. Only the copyright holder can release a free license. You ae not the copyright holder -> you cannot release a free license. Find the copyright holder and ask him ti sent a releasing mail to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 11:41, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Name Removal[edit]

Name Removal Please remove the Operators name ,B Lena, from these three images,pages,and file names. This is for security of him and the personnel on this mission. DAS-1

Thank you. Electricsurge81 (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment Somewhat pointless, since it will forever be visible in the image history. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
What images are you talking about? The ones you named never existed. You can request the renmaming of images with the template {{rename}}. --JuTa 13:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


How do you detect duplicates? Thank you for helping me in that matter. Triplecaña (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm using Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. And on the bottom of each file description page there should be a note if there is a dupe. If so you could mark one of the using template {{duplicate}}. regards. --JuTa 15:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:1915 in Wellington[edit]

When it says on deletion that the only contributor was Eddaido does it mean there was a file in there but only the one and categorised by me? Eddaido (talk) 23:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

No, it means you created the category and nobody else edited the category page later. There was no image or whatever categorized into it. regards. --JuTa 01:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)