User talk:Abmatos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Abmatos!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vasco da Gama from Parque Tejo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are a couple of dust spots toward the left and another near the bottom of the rightmost post. -- Ikan Kekek 19:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Removed all the dust spots I found, also denoised, please let me know if I missed someting.--Abmatos 14:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support - Still a bit noisy, but good enough for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 01:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vasco da Gama at Sunrise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Several dust spots. I'm not sure whether it's too noisy - you might try de-noising, too. -- Ikan Kekek 19:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Removed dust spots and de-noised- It still has some noise, couldn't do anymore without losing a lot of sharpness (or creating too many artifacts when resharpening). Might it still be too much noise for QI? Also, please let me know if I missed any dust spots--Abmatos 14:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - There's still a dust spot directly above the leftmost curve of the bridge. I'm still unsure whether there's too much noise, but remove the dust spot and I'll think about it. A discussion in Consensual Review may eventually be the best way to determine whether a dust spot-less version is promoted. -- Ikan Kekek 01:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done
Thanks. I'm going to give this photo Weak  Support. I'd welcome other opinions if anyone would like to differ. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Shizhao 08:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]