User talk:Bbb23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bbb23!

What are the odds... (no hard feelings right?)[edit]

I actually just noticed that the del req I had replied to was created by you. Hey wikimedia is a small place I guess... Anyway I just thought I would say that I'm not mad at yo about that en.wiki block, and hope in the future we could work together. It has inspired me to work on commons (heck I already have almost 2,000 edits...) which is a pretty nice place. Maybe I'll bump into your again in the deletion requests, but until then... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution to the deletion request.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Norden1990 is continuously evading his block using IP socks[edit]

Hello! I'd like to inform you that Norden1990 is continuously evading his block using IP socks. His latest IP sock is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/178.164.243.83 which belongs to the typical range 178.164.128.0/17 and was active on 30 June 2015 (2 days before the unblock request). This IP edited exclusively articles where Norden1900 contributed in the past. At the article József Antall‎ he added a file uploaded by himself on Wikimedia Commons. The same article from the Hungarian Wikipedia had been edited by Norden1990 on 28 June.

He also used IPs in April 2015 to add to en.wikipedia photos uploaded by himself on Wikimedia Commons.

I also notified Titptoey at User_talk:Tiptoety#Norden1990.27s_unblock_request_on_English_Wikipedia about Norden1990's unblock request. Iaaasi (talk) 09:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Its not me[edit]

Hey Bbb23 I just wanted to let you know that editor isn't me. I do have an account that I actively edit with at EnWP (I even voted on the Arbcom election). You can take my word for it or not, its irrelevant. But this is not the first time another editor as been blocked and accused of me, it's not the first time CU evidence was inconclusive (because CU data is useless frankly but thats another matter) and in fact multiple CU's have stated Checkusering me is next to worthless.

So, if you want to block that editor go ahead. Heck, even if it was me I would just create another one anyway. If they lift the ban I'll stop socking, I hate using another account and it screws things up. But, I refuse to follow a ban that has violated multiple polices since day one. It's just not going to happen. My ban shouldn't have been allowed 3 years ago and I am not going to follow it now. So you can tell them if they want to stop wasting time they should unblock me account. Cause thats all they are doing, wasting time and creating a problem where no problem should exist just so they have a "justification" for a ban that was never justified or even allowed by policy. Cheers! Reguyla (talk) 01:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)